It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

DC Pedo Ring Being Exposed - Democrats and Clinton

page: 19
155
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's. A. HOAX.




posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's. A. HOAX.


Hey man, your URL is broken for some reason.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

Weird. It worked on the previous page.

OK, then.

Go to: https:// w i k i l e a k s .org/podesta-emails/

Search for "hair in my pizza".

Bingo - no results. It's not there. It's a hoax.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: audubon

I was never able to find the whole "hair on my pizza" email either. All the other ones seemed to be there but this one eluded me.

I wonder if it was part of a different leak? Or just made up?

Does anyone know?

Thanks.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: audubon

So one e-mail makes the entire thing a hoax?



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

I don't see why not



Because the whole purpose of the code is to avoid detection. Because a secret code used by pedophiles would absolutely already have safe founding words to describe the primary object of their deviant behavior.


Hairless pizza is too obvious, I guess is what you're saying.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: audubon

ATS are filtering wikileaks(dot)org

www.abovetopsecret.com...


It's already been pointed out but I guess it's worth saying again. ATS doesn't allow links to sites that obtain content illegally nor do we allow links to porno, known phishing or malware sites... That's all there is to it.

Springer...

ETA:

OUR OFFICIAL POSITION

The ATS staff has completed a long discussion regarding removing the block on links to WikiLeaks, which included reaching out to our hosting provider. The primary reason we disallowed links previously (and often the driving-force for many of our policies) is that such links to the types of materials hosted on WikiLeaks would be a technical violation of our Acceptable Use Policy with our provider. And to further make this issue more sensitive with our provider, they took heat a few years back for hosting WikiLeaks mirrors.

Lots of "conspiracy sites" can overcome such restrictions because their providers are either less stringent, or have no such restrictions at all. Given the scale of our traffic, and the need for high-end hardware and network, pretty much every hosting provider capable of providing what we need will have similar (or identical) restrictions. It's the unfortunate conundrum in which ATS lives... moving to another host isn't an option.

Our policy remains the same, unfortunately. But back when this first became an issue, we urged members to find other sites, sources, blogs, etc. that covered the WikiLeaks material they wanted to include in their post -- then link to those sites, with an explanation of where to find the links once there. That remains the best course of action for now


Old but I don't think the reason would of changed and I'm about to go out and don't want to search anymore



edit on 10-11-2016 by aivlas because: edits for links/shoo edits

edit on 10-11-2016 by aivlas because: Using Springer



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's. A. HOAX.


Link. Doesn't. Work.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   
I guess we need to re-research this, while the jury is out on it.

Thanks for your help on this one. I went looking and found it, but if so, you would think you'd also be able to locate it at WikiLeaks.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Darkmadness
a reply to: audubon

So one e-mail makes the entire thing a hoax?


Well, I think it's safe to say there are definitely hoaxers involved in all this. Given where all this started, it's not surprising.

For example, someone on 4Chan was trying to pass off a screen-shot from an episode of criminal minds as a photo of the abducted McCann girl.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: 4003fireglo

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's. A. HOAX.


Link. Doesn't. Work.


I think it's because ATS does not allow links to wiki links.

However, he explained how to do it.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

I don't see why not



Because the whole purpose of the code is to avoid detection. Because a secret code used by pedophiles would absolutely already have safe founding words to describe the primary object of their deviant behavior.


Hairless pizza is too obvious, I guess is what you're saying.


Yes. Exactly. Not only is it too obvious, there'd be no reason to ad lib something so fundamental to their code.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Darkmadness


So one e-mail makes the entire thing a hoax?


GGGNNNGGGG....If people actually bothered to read conversations before jumping into them halfway through, this place would run a lot quicker.

What I said was that this alleged 'hair on pizza' email is a hoax. There is no source for it. It is not in the WL database. As conclusively as it is possible to prove a negative at all, the alleged email does not exist.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: audubon

Thank you.

I apologize for forwarding misinformation. I didn't know.

Have you Googled to see precisely where it came from?



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

It's fine, I wasn't really annoyed, more amused - and no harm done anyway, so let's move on.

I have googled now, but didn't turn up anything conclusive. Although FWIW the email has been discussed on 4Chan who (ironically enough) almost unanimously denounced it as fake. It may be that 4Chan's OP was the faker, but I couldn't find enough to work with.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 09:00 AM
link   
a reply to: ghostrager

Even if they do find the evidence to fry the politicians, the politicians will just run to their houses in Belize to hide and disappear.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
Hey Folks
Total noob here... hi

Just thought I'd toss out some breadcrumbs that haven't been nibbled on yet (as far as I know) to illustrate a pattern of behaviour:

www.frontpagemag.com...

therightscoop.com...



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 04:22 PM
link   
If this were real, many people WOULD be in jail



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
I've just provided evidence for people who SHOULD be in jail, but were let off the hook because they are part of the "club"
Shoulda, coulda, woulda. Who's in charge? I have my own mind, made up.
a reply to: MaxTellsAll


edit on 11-11-2016 by Marvelous because: Added comma, for emphasis.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Marvelous


Apparently it is real, and the people concerned are not in jail. Which leaves a very strong taste in the mouth that their is a Pedo. protection racket. Going on at the top of many of the Western governments. Note the stonewalling of the British one. They are waiting for the main offenders to die, and the later ones have covered their tracks . The conclusion must be that their is a very powerful lobby of Pedos evenly distributed in key positions so they can protect each other ...what other conclusion can their be? www.dailymail.co.uk... o-one-wanted-know.html
edit on 11-11-2016 by anonentity because: (no reason given)







 
155
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join