It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sen. Rand Paul is trying to block the nomination of President Obama’s surgeon general nominee, Dr. Vivek Murthy, over what he calls “serious concerns” about Murthy’s leadership in a group that promotes ObamaCare and gun control.
Paul, R-Ky., told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in a letter that he objects to Murthy’s nomination because he questions Murthy’s ability to impartially serve as “America’s Doctor.” The letter marks an escalation in a simmering fight over the nominee, for a post that is typically not so controversial.
“Historically, the Surgeon General of the United States has been a position with the purpose of educating Americans so that they may lead healthier lives, rather than advancing a political agenda,” Paul wrote. “Dr. Murthy has disqualified himself from being Surgeon General because of his intent to use that position to launch an attack on Americans’ right to own a firearm under the guise of a public health and safety campaign.”
President Obama is using every executive power in his arsenal to infringe on Second Amendment rights. His latest maneuver is to nominate a rabidly anti-gun doctor to be the next U.S. surgeon general. Dr. Vivek Murthy is facing Senate approval in upcoming weeks.
Dr. Murthy is the 36-year-old president and co-founder of Doctors for America, a group that advocates for Obamacare and gun control laws.
The group calls gun violence “a public health crisis.” It pushes for Congress to ban “assault weapons” and “high-capacity” magazines and calls for spending tax dollars for more gun-control research.
The organization also lobbies for doctors to be allowed to ask patients, including minors, whether they have legal guns in the home. If the patient admits to having guns, Dr. Murthy wants doctors to “counsel them appropriately about safety measures.”
The only thing that should matter ... is he qualified and is he the best choice because of medical/health reasons, or is he being picked for political reasons.
President Obama ordered two more executive actions Thursday to restrict guns, banning the re-importation of military surplus firearms to private entities and proposing a regulation that would close a loophole in background checks. Read more: www.washingtontimes.com... Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Attending the dinner were House members Eric Cantor, Jeb Hensarling, Pete Hoekstra, Dan Lungren, Kevin McCarthy, Paul Ryan and Pete Sessions. From the Senate were Tom Coburn, Bob Corker, Jim DeMint, John Ensign and Jon Kyl. Others present were former House Speaker and future – and failed – presidential candidate Newt Gingrich and the Republican strategist Frank Luntz, who organised the dinner and sent out the invitations.
The dinner table was set in a square at Luntz's request so everyone could see one another and talk freely. The session lasted four hours and by the end the sombre mood had lifted: they had conceived a plan. They would take back the House in November 2010, which they did, and use it as a spear to mortally wound Obama in 2011 and take back the Senate and White House in 2012, Draper writes.
"If you act like you're the minority, you're going to stay in the minority," said Keven McCarthy, quoted by Draper. "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill and challenge them on every single campaign."
MystikMushroom
What I find ironic is that even if the guy was pro-gun, built his own fire arms and hated Obamacare -- he'd still be blocked by the GOP.
burdman30ott6
reply to post by BritofTexas
The irony...
He allowed his ABO certification to expire in protest of the ABO board's decision to not require recertification for older eye doctors (which make up the entire board). If it was anyone other than Rand Paul throwing up middle fingers at the good ol' boy network, your posting history says you'd be cheering him on. Disingenuous indignation is disingenuous.
KeliOnyx
Does anyone else here find it odd that the issue here is a Dr. that sees fit to push his political agenda is calling out the President's nominee because his political pursuits oppose his? Last time I checked we are free to have our own political philosophies. Only issue that should matter here is the man qualified for the job? From what I see yes he is qualified.
burdman30ott6
reply to post by BritofTexas
The irony...
He allowed his ABO certification to expire in protest of the ABO board's decision to not require recertification for older eye doctors (which make up the entire board). If it was anyone other than Rand Paul throwing up middle fingers at the good ol' boy network, your posting history says you'd be cheering him on. Disingenuous indignation is disingenuous.
Rodman confirmed that if a board is not on the list, then a Kentucky specialist is prohibited from advertising himself as board certified. That list does not include the National Ophthalmology Board.
burdman30ott6
reply to post by KeliOnyx
Uh, Paul is a US senator. He's kind of, sort of been sent to DC to voice his personal political ideals. Unless his constutents are big supporters of the surgeon general candidate, he's doing EXACTLY what he was sent to DC to do... like it or not.
Dr. Murthy has disqualified himself from being Surgeon General because of his intent to use that position to launch an attack on Americans’ right to own a firearm under the guise of a public health and safety campaign.