It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Firsly, is resources, only a planet rich in combustable fuels would be valid to launch multiple rocket-propelled craft into space.
As others mentioned, combustible fuels simply won't take you to other solar systems in any reasonable amount of time.
SystemResistor
Firsly, is resources, only a planet rich in combustable fuels would be valid to launch multiple rocket-propelled craft into space.
If we faced a countdown to destruction, could we build a spacecraft to take us to new and habitable worlds? Can we Evacuate Earth? NGC's two-hour special examines this terrifying but scientifically plausible scenario by exploring how we could unite to ensure the survival of the human race.
It's a lot more scientifically more realistic than using combustible fuels, since it uses Project Orion (which is a technology well within reach but banned within Earth's atmosphere) for propulsion in one ship and antimatter (which is a hypothetical propulsion technology) in another.
boncho
reply to post by Arbitrageur
It's a lot more scientifically more realistic than using combustible fuels, since it uses Project Orion (which is a technology well within reach but banned within Earth's atmosphere) for propulsion in one ship and antimatter (which is a hypothetical propulsion technology) in another.
If I was in charge of the space program I would have green lighted Orion and it would be on its way to Alpha Centuri by now…
Completely unrelated, my application to run the space program has been repeatedly denied.
edit on 20-2-2014 by boncho because: (no reason given)
pikestaff
I have watched evacuate Earth, and I don't remember ion drive being mentioned at all, which at the moment is the only practical interstellar drive we have at the moment.
As for food, the craft will be big enough for food to be grown inside, the cylinder of the craft rotating to give one g, might be a bit of a problem with the Coriolis effect, but, perhaps at one g constant, the cylinder would not rotate but have 'stories' same as a skyscraper?
In order to improve on this performance while reducing size and cost, Dyson also considered an alternative momentum limited pusher plate design where an ablation coating of the exposed surface is substituted to get rid of the excess heat. The limitation is then set by the capacity of shock absorbers to transfer momentum from the impulsively accelerated pusher plate to the smoothly accelerated vehicle. Dyson calculated that the properties of available materials limited the velocity transferred by each explosion to ~30 meters per second independent of the size and nature of the explosion. If the vehicle is to be accelerated at 1 Earth gravity (9.81 m/s2) with this velocity transfer, then the pulse rate is one explosion every three seconds.
At 0.1c, Orion thermonuclear starships would require a flight time of at least 44 years to reach Alpha Centauri, not counting time needed to reach that speed (about 36 days at constant acceleration of 1g or 9.8 m/s2). At 0.1c, an Orion starship would require 100 years to travel 10 light years. The astronomer Carl Sagan suggested that this would be an excellent use for current stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
yorkshirelad
Not possible using sub-light propulsion.