New Declassified Docs Expose Obama’s Benghazi Lies

^ Obama assures it did everything possible to protect Benghazi Americans, yet couldn't name one thing it did do.

canadafreepress.com...

n classified testimony given on June 26, 2013 to the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Gen. Carter Hamm, former head of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) revealed he was the one who broke the news to former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. According to declassified testimony obtained by Fox News, Hamm testified that he learned about the attack only 15 minutes after it began at 9:42 p.m. Libya time. Thus, the administration’s carefully crafted narrative that the attack was based on a video has once again been revealed for the lie it always was.

CIA stood back while all of this was unfolding and allowed this narrative to go on longer than they should have.

Obama never ordered a rescue. Now 2014, MSM is downplaying that fact by proving Obama did not order a stand down.

mediamatters.org...

Why in the world would it have ordered a stand down when it didn't even bother to order or supervise a rescue mission?!

I mean, aside from it being a 9/11 commemorative sacrifice as Benghazi Americans were apparently intended to die on that auspicious anniversary, and Benghazi American survivors, threatened to this very day.

reply to post by gardener


Obama, Clinton and Holder should be tried in court. There is plenty of evidence to support the fact they tried to cover it up and gave stand down orders to the rescue team...

...Maybe one day...

-SAP-

Too bad the GOP didn't feel this angry over W's lies to get us into Iraq. How many Americans were killed? And for what?

Oh yeah, I forgot it's all about which football team your rooting for.

rupertg
Too bad the GOP didn't feel this angry over W's lies to get us into Iraq. How many Americans were killed? And for what?

Oh yeah, I forgot it's all about which football team your rooting for.

You make it partisan by calling out the GOP specifically.

How about "people" or "Americans"?

People were and still are pretty pissed about W. People are still pretty pissed about Clinton lies. And, shocker, people are pissed about Obamas lies.

Granted Democrats and Republicans arent really people so they will pick and choose what upsets them.

SloAnPainful
reply to post by gardener

 

Obama, Clinton and Holder should be tried in court. There is plenty of evidence to support the fact they tried to cover it up and gave stand down orders to the rescue team...

...Maybe one day...

-SAP-

were you there?...if not, then you know nothing about what happened...extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof...for all I know, its was a bunch of right-wing military and CIA operatives making crap up, and sending crap intel back to Washington...lotsa ole southern white boys in the military, that would like nothing better to see the president and Hillary strung up.

reply to post by jimmyx

were you there?...if not, then you know nothing about what happened...extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

If I'm not mistaken Jimmy, the call for trials or at least open hearings without precondition to limitation of exploring what happened *IS* about finding, not assuming the truth of what caused 4 Americans to be murdered in service, far from home.

It's this insane push and outright fight AGAINST ever having a single solid investigative run through of just what did happen to cause that minor catastrophe of US foreign policy, which is baffling.

Why is it some fight so hard, so often and so predictably to see NOTHING more about this incident come to light or be permitted to be looked into? Some sure feel strongly about that ...and it'd be called obstructing justice, if justice was something our nation still had much of, anyway.

reply to post by rupertg


Who is in charge right now?

Very simple really.

reply to post by jimmyx


Of course I wasn't there...

You are also making extraordinary claims without proof...



-SAP-

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


Your just a racist then. And anyone that presses this Wonderful President we have, or his administration to answer questions regarding Benghazi are racists as well.
Same goes for the IRS situation, Fast and Furious, 0bamacare or anything else.

Racists. That is just what you guys are.


Oh, and it's Bush's fault.

rupertg
Too bad the GOP didn't feel this angry over W's lies to get us into Iraq. How many Americans were killed? And for what?

Oh yeah, I forgot it's all about which football team your rooting for.

Hmmm



Yeah it is all about which 'football' team your rooting for.

reply to post by macman


Oh yeah, it's always Bush's fault. /endsarcasm

Always place blame on the previous President...

-SAP-

It has been a while since then but am I mistaken about the events that were going on around the world at that time?

Correct me if I am wrong but were there riots actually taking place that were due to the video?


If there were I just do not understand why people keep harping about the administration saying it was due to the video.

Is it that people think the intel community is always 100% accurate all the time and anything that gets reported that was wrong has to be a deliberate conspiracy to mislead the public?

Granted the public has been mislead in the past on such things we know that because of Iraq but are their people think that it is always like that?

reply to post by Grimpachi


Those 'riots' had more to do with the current administration bombing the hell out of them more than anything else.

And the current administration did push a video.

Even it's pundits like Susan Rice.

Wait!

Maybe Benghazi was over a video:



This one.

reply to post by neo96

Those 'riots' had more to do with the current administration bombing the hell out of them more than anything else.

So you are saying the video did have something to do with the riots though. More or less, correct?

Captain Hindsight was a great character on southpark.

Grimpachi
reply to post by neo96

 

Those 'riots' had more to do with the current administration bombing the hell out of them more than anything else.

So you are saying the video did have something to do with the riots though. More or less, correct?

For a video having anything to do with Benghazi would make Libya the number one most populous country that watches Youtube.

As I said the Obama administration bombed the hell out of them months earlier.

Did they think they would just lay there, and take it ?

Without no reprisals ?

They pushed a video as a deflection tactic.

reply to post by neo96

They pushed a video as a deflection tactic.

WHY???

rupertg
Too bad the GOP didn't feel this angry over W's lies to get us into Iraq. How many Americans were killed? And for what?

Oh yeah, I forgot it's all about which football team your rooting for.

Agreed. How many more Americans have/were killed in Iraq because of lies told to the American public? If anything everyday life in Iraq is worse than it was before the invasion. We've probably also created an entire new generation of terrorists as well.

I hate the numbers games with lives, but clearly GWB's lies cost far more lives than this one Bengazi incident.

Grimpachi
reply to post by neo96

 

They pushed a video as a deflection tactic.

WHY???

Because it was a GD election year.

reply to post by MystikMushroom


Yes.....because whenever it is pointed out that 0bama is involved with yet another scandal or whatever, it is always best to just bring up Bush. And not address the issue at hand.