It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I accept science that is repeatable observable and testable, not fairytails, at least till they are proven
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by borntowatch
I accept science that is repeatable observable and testable, not fairytails, at least till they are proven
I see. So your religion and its god meets that criteria? It's not a fairy tail because it's observable, testable, proven. Is this right? Alright tell us how to observe god. What tests can we repeat? Lets observe the miracles of the Bible. What tests can we repeat?
The problem with this discussion is that you seem to want to use logic and reason when it's convenient. Your beliefs should be under the same level of scrutiny. Yet apparently they are not.
I might have missed this. How old you personally think the Earth is?edit on 2-2-2014 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)
Lucid Lunacy
reply to [url= by borntowatch[/url]
I accept science that is repeatable observable and testable, not fairytails, at least till they are proven
I see. So your religion and its god meets that criteria? It's not a fairy tail because it's observable, testable, proven. Is this right? Alright tell us how to observe god. What tests can we repeat? Lets observe the miracles of the Bible. What tests can we repeat?
Special pleading (also known as stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and one-sided assessment)
beefydog
reply to post by beefydog
On topic with this post, just want to point out that the speed of light is not a theory, but a fact consistent with a multitude of independent experiments done over the last 150 years or so. (and this makes the laser possible!)
borntowatch
beefydog
reply to post by beefydog
On topic with this post, just want to point out that the speed of light is not a theory, but a fact consistent with a multitude of independent experiments done over the last 150 years or so. (and this makes the laser possible!)
Can you prove light speed is constant and has always been so
That isnt a big ask is it?
does this young earth theory imply that the entire universe is 6000 years old? or only the earth is 6000 years old?
Did I not explain clearly in previous posts I accept Jesus by faith
I dont accept science by faith as science is not a religion to me like others
Akragon
reply to post by Ghost147
I appreciate your help in this thread... and the other topic you made about "science for creationists"
thank you much brother... I will S&F your thread as well
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by tomoe723
does this young earth theory imply that the entire universe is 6000 years old? or only the earth is 6000 years old?
The Earth was created before the stars in Genesis. So I assume the whole Universe.
borntowatch
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy
Did I not explain clearly in previous posts I accept Jesus by faith
I dont accept science by faith as science is not a religion to me like others
Ghost147
borntowatch
beefydog
reply to post by beefydog
On topic with this post, just want to point out that the speed of light is not a theory, but a fact consistent with a multitude of independent experiments done over the last 150 years or so. (and this makes the laser possible!)
Can you prove light speed is constant and has always been so
That isnt a big ask is it?
Actually, it is. Considering that within Physics there are Postulates which are verified to be valid or not, it has nothing to do with proof. It is simply a matter of formulating and postulating mathematical calculations. These calculations need to be verified to be valid or not. The constant speed of light is a postulate of Special Relativity. This is verified through our measurements. It is not a matter of proof or not. So no, we can't "prove it", but we can verify the mathematics.
Enough of the details, on to the verification. We can actually slow the speed of light. We can do this because light moves at different speeds through different mediums. Thus, the speed of light is not immutable. However, it is constant through these mediums. The vacuum of space is the medium we would use to measure the general speed of light throughout the universe, or "c", which is in fact constant.
Here's a reference to the scientific paper for the constancy.
Ellis, J.R., Farakos, K., Mavromatos, N.E., Mitsou, V.A., and Nanopoulos, D.V., “Astrophysical probes of the constancy of the velocity of light”, Astrophys. J., 535, 139–151, (2000). arXiv:astro-ph/9907340.
link
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by tomoe723
does this young earth theory imply that the entire universe is 6000 years old? or only the earth is 6000 years old?
The Earth was created before the stars in Genesis. So I assume the whole Universe.
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
tomoe723
borntowatch
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy
Did I not explain clearly in previous posts I accept Jesus by faith
I dont accept science by faith as science is not a religion to me like others
I beg to disagree on this one..
Science is actually just another form of religion.. we may not subscribe to an explicit organization like scientology, but this "science" as a whole is based upon some basic faiths that we just take for granted and subconsciously accept everything on top of it as "facts".
tomoe723
You accept the speed of light as "fact"
tomoe723
but in reality you are just putting your belief on the persons who claim that the speed of light is this (or represented by the constant c).
tomoe723 The paper itself doesn't even actually measure the speed of light (light particle) but infers the speed of light (or its constancy) from other sources.
tomoe723
It's important to remember that it's still a set of beliefs, to safeguard oneself from clinging to it consequently blinding oneself to other perspectives of how the universe could be.