It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Thank you for posting that Leveller. Some of thse people want it both ways. They cry its a war crime when a marine does something they dont aprove of, but never mention that these fighters are employing the most dirty tactics ever known to warfare and dont even come close to observing the Geneva rules.
Originally posted by Acecool79
When your city is bombed from above and you are doing everyting in your power to defend yourself and some one comes into your church where you have been wounded and shoots you, think about how you deserved it.
Simple as that, is it? Well, I'm curious. How do you discern between someone 'playing dead' and someone who's injured and/or unconscious?
However this paragraph states under which conditions it's not allowed to kill, injure or capture an adversary.
2. Ruses of war are not prohibited. Such ruses are acts which are intended to mislead an adversary or to induce him to act recklessly but which infringe no rule of international law applicable in armed conflict and which are not perfidious because they do not invite the confidence of an adversary with respect to protection under that law. The following are examples of such ruses: the use of camouflage, decoys, mock operations and misinformation."
1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy.
(snip)
Originally posted by Gazrok
Simple, AFTER the fighting has died down THEN you look for those injured... you yell to them (in Arabic, and I'm assuming they've all been taught this phrase) "Both hands up or I'll shoot!". You don't see both hands, then the guy gets ventilated. See? Simple really.
2. Ruses of war are not prohibited. Such ruses are acts which are intended to mislead an adversary or to induce him to act recklessly but which infringe no rule of international law applicable in armed conflict and which are not perfidious because they do not invite the confidence of an adversary with respect to protection under that law. The following are examples of such ruses: the use of camouflage, decoys, mock operations and misinformation."
In other words, you can use the tactics listed, as long as it isn't perfidious.
1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy.
(snip)
This paragraph then defines what constitutes perfidy....and the act of pretending to be dead or injured to then lead one into an ambush is certainly perfidious and thus such a combatant is not protected under international law.
Originally posted by Zero Point
I like the way you clutch at straws with the 'faking death contravenes the Geneva convention' line....your freaking loony tunes in the Pentagon don't consider the Geneva convention or International law applicable to the US anyway. Bit rich rolling out it's doctrine when it suits your own desire to sleep straight at nights.
Originally posted by ZeroDeep
Are terrorists and insurgents party to the Geneva Convention to begin with?
Deep
Originally posted by Bikereddie
Just found this story at the BBC,
It details the actual account of the so called NBC news reporter.
Take a look, it makes good reading.
news.bbc.co.uk...