It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ibn Iblis
Anyone who chooses to play dead rather than surrender when given the opportunity should be shot.
Originally posted by Ibn Iblis
Anyone who chooses to play dead rather than surrender when given the opportunity should be shot.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
He opened fire on the Marine?
Why did the reporter who was there say there was no sign of weapons?
Did anyone see or hear his gunshots on the film?
Sounds like the military might be trying to spin the story.
You'll have a tough time getting the millions of people around the world who have seen the video to believe that.
I'm not saying it's not true.
Just that it's hard to believe.
Originally posted by Leveller
Playing dead is a contravention of the Geneva Convention and the militant was therefore not covered by the Rules of Engagement.
Originally posted by Leveller
Three things:
1) Playing dead is a contravention of the Geneva Convention and the militant was therefore not covered by the Rules of Engagement.
2) Using a mosque or any other place of worship as a site to fight from is a contravention of the Geneva Convention and the militant was therefore not covered by the Rules of Engagement.
3) Fighting out of uniform is a contravention of the Geneva Convention and the militant was therefore not covered by the Rules of Engagement.
So basically this guy commited 3 blatant war crimes under the Geneva Convention before he was disposed of. Legally, the US soldier was acting within the terms of the Geneva Convention when he pulled the trigger.
That's even without the story of the boobytrapped body coming into play.
As unsavoury as it may seem - # happens in war. This guy bought all the # down on his own head.
Originally posted by no such agency
It's in the same paragraph as "thou shalt not pretend to be wounded to gain favourable treatment from the enemy".
Cheers,
NSA
Originally posted by Durden
Originally posted by Leveller
Playing dead is a contravention of the Geneva Convention and the militant was therefore not covered by the Rules of Engagement.
Please point me in the direction where exactly in the Geneva Convention it says 'playing dead' is to be considered a violation. Not calling you a liar, I just have trouble finding this particular piece of information.
Originally posted by Leveller
"2. Ruses of war are not prohibited. Such ruses are acts which are intended to mislead an adversary or to induce him to act recklessly but which infringe no rule of international law applicable in armed conflict and which are not perfidious because they do not invite the confidence of an adversary with respect to protection under that law. The following are examples of such ruses: the use of camouflage, decoys, mock operations and misinformation."
1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy.
(snip)