It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
QUESTION: Any do-overs that you would -- relative to Secretary of State?
HILLARY CLINTON: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, you make these choices based on imperfect information. And you make them to -- as we say, the best of your ability. But that doesn't mean that there's not going to be unforeseen consequences, unpredictable twists and turns.
HILLARY CLINTON: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, you make these choices based on imperfect information. And you make them to -- as we say, the best of your ability. But that doesn't mean that there's not going to be unforeseen consequences, unpredictable twists and turns.
In 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College titled "There Is Only the Fight . . . ": An Analysis of the Alinsky Model. The subject was famed radical community organizer Saul Alinsky.
The thesis offered a critique of Alinsky's methods as largely ineffective, all the while describing Alinsky's personality as appealing. The thesis sought to fit Alinsky into a line of American social activists, including Eugene V. Debs, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Walt Whitman. Written in formal academic language, the thesis concluded that "[Alinsky's] power/conflict model is rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts" and that Alinsky's model had not expanded nationally due to "the anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict."
Hillary Rodham senior thesis
BINGO! Very astute observation!
Antipathy17
reply to post by neo96
I hope people see what she stated for what it really is. She was trying to push the idea that she was taking responsibility. Yet she kills that idea to people who aren't as highly indoctrinated by stating some bs about making bad decisions on bad intelligence. Why does that matter so much? Because she never said Benghazi happened because of bad intelligence but she gave that impression to those mentioned above. She gave a false impression of Benghazi by linking mass bad intelligence situations at a time Benghazi was mentions. We all know Benghazi wasn't able to be completed because the white house was getting bad intelligence. Quite the opposite, they had perfect intelligence and decided not to act... is it because Stevens was heading weapons trade with turkey to funnel into Syria? Me thinks so.edit on 27-1-2014 by Antipathy17 because: (no reason given)
Q: What is the difference between Nixons Watergate cover-up and Obamas Benghazi cover-up?
HILLARY CLINTON: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, you make these choices based on imperfect information. And you make them to -- as we say, the best of your ability. But that doesn't mean that there's not going to be unforeseen consequences, unpredictable twists and turns.
My first instinct - she had no regrets until she was caught.