It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A stock market correction is approaching the level of near certainty as Wall Street faces a major paradigm shift in how to achieve price gains, according to aGoldman Sachs analysis.
In a market outlook that garnered significant attention from traders Monday, the firm’s strategists called theS&P 500 valuation “lofty by almost any measure” and attached a 67 percent probability to the chance that the market would fall by 10 percent or more, which is the technical yardstick for a correction.
The current valuation of the S&P 500 is lofty by almost any measure, both for the aggregate market as well as the median stock: (1) The P/E ratio; (2) the current P/E expansion cycle; (3) EV/Sales; (4) EV/EBITDA; (5) Free Cash Flow yield; (6) Price/Book as well as the ROE and P/B relationship; and compared with the levels of (6) inflation; (7) nominal 10-year Treasury yields; and (8) real interest rates. Furthermore, the cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio suggests the S&P 500 is currently 30% overvalued in terms of (9) Operating EPS and (10) about 45% overvalued
The Obama administration has caused irreparable damage to the foundations of our economy in about every crooked way possible and dhs has been gearing up heavily for civil unrest
Panic2k11
reply to post by MOSTwanted
As a non American it baffles me on how idiotic Americans in general (not in total) express political views and protest against governance. In Europe most of us understand that the idiot in charge is a stick figure (most of the time and increasingly so) that is a front for a party (not as linear as that in the US but substitute party by a cabal of interests, that even has less interest in the interests of the population that in Europe, since they have to contend with often constructive attacks by multiple opposing forces, a benefit of not having an almost artificial duology of power).
What irked me to make this post was the party line that infects the OP into idiocy.
The Obama administration has caused irreparable damage to the foundations of our economy in about every crooked way possible and dhs has been gearing up heavily for civil unrest
One may as well be mad with the present administration but one needs also to candid and realize that the problem is not only a causality of the present dummy. If you look at the Economy you can realize that it did not start (and will not end) in this term, in fact it started to aggravate for you US after Clinton (that did a good recuperative job if we consider the median and what he got handed down, even if some of his own actions also seeded some of the negative returns you are getting now).
Consider just one thing the American Credit Party is over, life will be tough from now on whatever magician you manage to conger up. You governance especially since Regan did this to you and well to the rest of the Western world. Note that the BRICS are not taking the cake they just are getting their act together, the cake was already eaten by your credit driven economy model and will doom many future generations. There is today very few areas of expansion and we can hope now is a boom and bust cycle and hope that the bust creates so much destruction that opportunities exist for the next boom...
I wish that most of you that are still pushing a party line consider your own future and the validity of your claims beyond attempting to sell the next cycle. I get that we should it the dummy but after him they will just prop up another one...
Excuse me, but you are not from our country therefore you are unqualified to act like an expert on our economy as you lack any experience of what it is like to be led by Obama.
Panic2k11
reply to post by MOSTwanted
Excuse me, but you are not from our country therefore you are unqualified to act like an expert on our economy as you lack any experience of what it is like to be led by Obama.
Sadly your view as expressed above is not only wrong but demonstrate what is wrong with your nation's world view. Most of the world is directed by your national politics since the end of WW2, those that are not directed are influenced and those that are not influences are invaded or require nuclear weapons to keep your grubby hands off their national resources. So it is a sad state of affairs but it is what makes your business my business, I wish I would have to pay as much attention to your politicians travesties as much as I do lets say to the Estonian ones...
Dianec
reply to post by Saucerking
Why would one do that if the economy is about to crash. I don't know a lot about it so a genuine question.
13th Zodiac
Dianec
reply to post by Saucerking
Why would one do that if the economy is about to crash. I don't know a lot about it so a genuine question.
Goes like this, they have to say it to get it going. They have to say the Words for it to manifest.and so God was the Word and the Word was God. So in other Words let there be light and there was ........? Religion has nothing to do with what I am saying. Read between the lines.
however in doing so like our European cousins, we have entered a debt spiral.
Panic2k11
reply to post by MOSTwanted
however in doing so like our European cousins, we have entered a debt spiral.
Humm not so fast, first not all European nations did go into the credit wagon and not in the rate the US did or taking advantage of its capacity to export inflation. Even if you look at the PIIGS (the boarder of the EU) you can readily understand why they collapsed, one needs not be an Economist to see that not all European Economies are at the same level of development (Ireland was a miracle nation not so long ago) and to a point have been cannibalized from central Europe. With the exception of England you do not have any similitude in Europe, the EU problem is the crazy structuring of the EURO and the periphery is only suffering because the center refuses to take the required actions. One also needs to understand that even if the problem was latent the European crisis was an export from the US collapse and toxic products.
America was never about capitalism, at best free enterprise ideals that was to a point obvious that would devolve in the way it did, even your founding fathers warned of the dangers. Now as European I don't see any problem with socialism to a point is safer to implement than communism and capitalism is not really a social structure but an economic system (that has no social considerations) and so by itself can't be implemented as to guide social development. American style individualism is a mirage than can't be realized in todays exhausted and over populated world...
edit on 14-1-2014 by Panic2k11 because: (no reason given)
It's like the pot is calling the kettle black
The only idiocy in this thread is from your socialist (hence communist as it always leads to that) viewpoint declaring how America never was a capitalist economy/society.
You have failed to identify any real causes for economic instability like world debt based fiat currencies instituted by the world's richest elite and how through entities like corporations and the chartering of nations into corporations under Vatican charters through the queen of England, the bankers and Jesuit run political criminals have given unto themselves sovereign immunity.
Power, and control over every aspect of your life is the goal and the majority of cattle like you are more than willing to be government serfs.
well that said America's market isn't going to crash anytime soon and all this doom is just hyperbole to get tired key board warriors afraid and peeing in there pant's.
Panic2k11
reply to post by MOSTwanted
It's like the pot is calling the kettle black
That implies similarity my point was that there are few similarities at all. That is there is not two cancers but a cancer that has metathesized globally...
The only idiocy in this thread is from your socialist (hence communist as it always leads to that) viewpoint declaring how America never was a capitalist economy/society.
America was never a capitalist economy or society, I already explained why a society can't be based solely on capitalistic goals (they have no social values), and even if we can loosely classify American economy as capitalistic (it always had checks and balances that prevented a full implementation of capitalistic ideals, since they aren't compatible with a viable human society). Free enterprise is what better defines the original US ideology that and the empowerment of individualism (at least in aspiration, since the state is not compatible with anarchism).
You have failed to identify any real causes for economic instability like world debt based fiat currencies instituted by the world's richest elite and how through entities like corporations and the chartering of nations into corporations under Vatican charters through the queen of England, the bankers and Jesuit run political criminals have given unto themselves sovereign immunity.
No I didn't. For failure can only exist if an attempt had been made, I had no intention to do so (that was your point, not mine), I could attempt to disprove that but in part I agree with that assessment. I just do not think that today the Vatican or the Queen (or any other monarchy) has any special seat in world power structure, their time has passed and they have many blames but I don't believe that it was a linear implementation of a project, but a series of unfortunate alignments in goals and aspirations that created the power structure we have today.
Power, and control over every aspect of your life is the goal and the majority of cattle like you are more than willing to be government serfs.
I agree with it but I refuse the label and the inference that you know who I am or how I behave. Even if I take you defend capitalistic orientations that I see as unsustainable we agree in many areas, I'm not a socialist I am an anarcho-communism, in that I can identify that I only see a distinction between us. You only care about yourself and I tend to care more about my close community than myself, you are willing only to do sacrifice for your own prosperity, I am willing to do sacrifice for my community benefit even in detriment to my own prosperity. I think that it is obvious in what type of society one should aspire to live a society that thinks like me or one that thinks like you.
Look back to the causes you enumerated and examine closely if they aren't really an expression of your vision. If you understand a bit about economics or sociology you understand that cartelization, monopolism and capital corruption of social structures are a consequence of capitalistic goals.