It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
okamitengu
so, its ok if your army uses your tax dollars to kill foreign babies?
but you cant have mothers decide the fate of their own foetuses?
not if that uses your tax money?
First people are complaining about blacks taking up welfare and other social services and then they complain if they want to keep from having a child.
Nyiah
reply to post by elouina
My, aren't you all cute trying to make it look like I said something I certainly did not. Whatever you're reading into abortion services, I'm not. I'm in full support of someone choosing their own reproductive path, even if it means having an abortion. You seem to not like anyone who's not in line with your views here, that much is obvious. But trying to say I'm all for blacks being eradicated because I said I have no problem with my tax money being used for an abortion just erodes you own credibility. If the money was being used to drag people in in the dead of night & forcefully abort/sterilize, I'd certainly have a fekking problem with that, there's a blatant removal of freedom there, hon. The same freedom is removed when you bar or want to bar people access because you have an issue with it.
Keep you hands out of another's uterus, eh? Unless they want them there, that is.edit on 1/13/2014 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)
ignorant_ape
reply to post by elouina
maybe there are 149 abortions / one adoption [ if this stat is indeed true ] - because women don't want 9 months of pregnancy and the ordeal of childbirth / possible C-section ??????
EllaMarina
reply to post by Gryphon66
For once, a voice of levelheaded reason. Using "murder" to describe pregnancy termination cheapens the word. I couldn't care less about microscopic tadpoles in someone's midsection, no matter what type of DNA they contain.
And now, I must resume my resolve to keep my head out of abortion threads.
By 1911, Sanger had moved to New York City, where she became heavily influenced by anarchist, socialist, and labor activists. She began joining and participating in radical groups and causes.
After the failed terrorist attempt, Sanger wrote a commentary, calling the deaths a display of “courage, determination, conviction, a spirit of defiance.” She argued the “real tragedy” was “the cowardice and the poisonous respectability” of the movement’s leaders who offered apologies, rather than defiance, for the episode. Sanger urged those in the movement to “accept and exult in every act of revolt against oppression,” including terrorist acts. She also published a complementary article that defended the assassination of political or industrial leaders.
August 1914, Sanger was indicted for inciting murder and assassination, and for violating obscenity laws. But instead of facing the charges, she fled the country. On the trip to England, after the ship had entered international waters, Sanger instructed her supporters to distribute 100,000 copies of her pamphlet, Family Limitation. In February 1916, the charges were dropped.
Sanger rejected positive eugenics, while embracing negative eugenics. She wrote, “Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.” She stressed the need to merge eugenics with birth control, adding, “Eugenics without Birth Control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit.”
The bottom of the matter was “to create a race of thoroughbreds.” So the government, Sanger concluded, needed “to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring” and “to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”
She had a plan. And she was about to get an organization. In 1921, Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which (following a 1939 merger with the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau and then a 1942 name change) became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. While the organization was growing, the close association between the birth control movement and the eugenics movement had made a name change necessary. Nazi Germany had implemented racial hygiene policies, including mass sterilizations, inspired by the eugenics movement in America. So “birth control” was removed from the name to create a new public image. The agenda, though, stayed the same. And in 1948, Sanger helped form the International Committee on Planned Parenthood, which (in 1952) became the International Planned Parenthood Federation.
Through it all, the underlying theme, eliminating the unfit, never changed. In her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilization, she attacked charity as counterproductive, and dangerous, for helping the poor to produce even more “human waste.”
Sanger’s impact during her lifetime was highly negative, and included the cruelty of forced sterilization, which became a common practice. In America, over 60,000 people were sterilized against their will. And most occurred during the 1930s and 1940s when Sanger and the birth control and population control movements were pushing states hard to enact and enforce compulsory sterilization laws. Among the victims were the blind, the deaf, epileptics, the mentally retarded, the mentally ill, and people with low IQs diagnosed as “feeble-minded.”
Yes, I am saying that they are trying to wipe out the poor and blacks. So you admit that you feel that is exactly what they are doing? And you think this is right?
ignorant_ape
reply to post by elouina
maybe there are 149 abortions / one adoption [ if this stat is indeed true ] - because women don't want 9 months of pregnancy and the ordeal of childbirth / possible C-section ??????
neo96
reply to post by buster2010
First people are complaining about blacks taking up welfare and other social services and then they complain if they want to keep from having a child.
Gee maybe if a certain political ideological group was against abortion they would have more voters instead of killing them, and trying to make foreign citizens 'legal'.
neo96
reply to post by buster2010
First people are complaining about blacks taking up welfare and other social services and then they complain if they want to keep from having a child.
Gee maybe if a certain political ideological group was against abortion they would have more voters instead of killing them, and trying to make foreign citizens 'legal'.
But how are we to know 100%? The government needs to get out of the abortion business.
Hollywood fundraises for Texas abortions with ‘Night of a Thousand Vaginas!’
Read more: dailycaller.com...
The event, titled “A Night of A Thousand Vaginas!” will take place at the Largo at the Coronet in Los Angeles and is being billed as an “emergency benefit to help Texas women” who have been affected by Texas’ new abortion restrictions passed in the state over the summer.
A female demon of the night who supposedly flies around searching for newborn children either to kidnap or strangle them. Also, she sleeps with men to seduce them into propagating demon sons. Legends told about Lilith are ancient. The rabbinical myths of Lilith being Adam's first wife seem to relate to the Sumero-Babylonian Goddess Belit-ili, or Belili. To the Canaanites, Lilith was Baalat, the "Divine Lady." On a tablet from Ur, ca. 2000 BCE, she was addressed as Lillake.
www.pantheon.org...
They really are not trying to hide it.
Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, is perhaps the best 20th century example of the destructive power of spiritual deception. That she was wallowing in deception can be seen in a quote from a book written by an admirer: "She had tried to dispel depression by sex, travel, Rosicrucianism (a cult), numerology, now she tried a new panacea - astrology." Sanger was a confirmed adulteress who consistently and publicly supported a "woman's right to destroy." She became deeply involved with Havelock Ellis, a modern day false prophet who advocated a variety of bizarre sex practices supposing them to be the keys to spiritual enlightenment and power. For Margaret Sanger and her militantly (even religiously) promiscuous lifestyle, abortion became a necessary backup for contraceptive failure.
A more recent example can be found in a newsletter published by the National Abortion Federation. It provides an account of the 1985 national convention. One of the speakers was Carter Heyward, an ordained Episcopal priest who has been active for many years in the feminist movement. This quote was taken from her address: "If women were in charge, abortion would be a sacrament, an occasion of deep and serious and sacred meaning."