It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ENrgLee
reply to post by RickinVa
I think that a 8.9 earthquake, followed by a Tsunami, followed by explosions at a nuclear plant, followed by simultaneous triple core meltdown at a nuclear facility is an Epic Global Disaster......... you do not.
How is it global?
They all happened at the same place.... a City in Japan.
more false information... if you will kindly scroll back to the original post, you will find there were links provided.
In parts of Japan, radioactivity has been detected at various times in milk, meat, vegetables and tap water, on the ground and in the sea around the power plant.
no one is attacking you... it would seem to be the other way around
ENrgLee
reply to post by RickinVa
more false information... if you will kindly scroll back to the original post, you will find there were links provided.
Lots of links reguarding what happens when you get exposed to high amounts of radiation...
The dangers of it....
The things it can do to you.....
Only one article of the several that you linked, even talks about radiation measurements from fukushima, and that article, NOT ONLY uses Rems (instead of seiverts) as a unit of measurement, but it is 3 years old, and there is only ONE mention of an actual measurement, and it is FROM the reactor.
An example from your first link:
In parts of Japan, radioactivity has been detected at various times in milk, meat, vegetables and tap water, on the ground and in the sea around the power plant.
How much radiaiton?
What element?
What isotope?
What energy levels?
Is it naturally occuring?
Etcetera...
Your links do not contain any useful information that one could use to inform thelselves of what is actually happening, NOW....
And the information that IS contained in this article is either vague, nonsensical, pointless, or using outdated terminology.
It's kind of sad.
no one is attacking you... it would seem to be the other way around
Are you suggesting that me asking you a question about the normal level of radiation in the oceans, and then answering that question FOR YOU, when you refused to answer....
Is attacking you?
This is a thread about bio-accumulation.
You have not posted one bit of information about actual measurements of bioaccumulated radiation from Fukushima.
I think your topic, is off topic.
RickinVa
Back to bio accumulation.... it will be interesting to see the results of the Kelp study.... They are getting volunteers to help take samples all up and down the California coast.
edit on 14-1-2014 by RickinVa because: spelling error
Human0815
RickinVa
Back to bio accumulation.... it will be interesting to see the results of the Kelp study.... They are getting volunteers to help take samples all up and down the California coast.
edit on 14-1-2014 by RickinVa because: spelling error
We checked our Kelp/ Seaweed many Times,
please have a look: Seaweed
I hope the Translation work for you!
Original in Japanese for individual Download
Wrabbit2000
- If posts cannot be held to the topic, then hold them to yourself. Any further posts that reference each other instead of the topic will result in removal of the post, at the very least.
Go After The Ball, Not The Player
-Wrabbit
ENrgLee
reply to post by RickinVa
Ah, still not fast enough...
Here are the figures:
(1971 Radioactivity in the Marine Environment, National Academy of Sciences)
(Abstract: www.umich.edu...)
Natural Radioactivity in the Ocean
(Figures for all oceans, seperated by isotope)
Uranium 41,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
Potassium-40 14,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
Tritium 740,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
Carbon-14 6,700,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
Rubidium-87 1,300,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
Grand Total: 15,348,440,000,000,000,000,000 Bequerels
(That's 15.3 Zetta Bequerels)
How much did you say was being dumped into the oceans?
you will never ever convince me or anyone with half a brain that adding more radiation on top of any existing radiation is a good thing.
And you will never get away with saying that Fukushima is the end of the world.edit on E2Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:57:36 -0600120America/ChicagoAmerica/Chicago by ENrgLee because: (no reason given)
Human0815
Op looks very angry because someone do not shared his Opinion,
but anger is a bad reason to start a Discussion, Topic or What So Ever
I am "happy" that this Accident happen/ed here in Japan and not
somewhere else like in Bulgaria, Slovenia or any other old Eastern European Plant.
I am "happy" that this Accident happen/ed here in Japan and not somewhere else like in Bulgaria, Slovenia or any other old Eastern European Plant.