It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
lostbook
It appears that the push toward Mars is "pushing" forward with a mock habitat in the Hanksville, Utah area. The crew ( Crew 133) will test the harsh, cold, desert environment for about 2 weeks (Jan. 4-19th), to simulate living on Mars. They will have to survive with limited supplies of food and water, and will have to make-do with limited communication(s) because on Mars there is a communication delay with Earth.
I like this push forward but I wonder if the environment is suitable for a mock Mars mission. Mars does have water but it's probably underground and who knows how deep underground. That difference might be really important to know. Also is the fact that they may have to grow their own food. However, Mars doesn't have the same soil as Earth and only grows some of the crops that can be grown on Earth; another important thing to note.
What say you, ATS? Doomed to fail or not?
allenidaho
Let's say NASA finally sends astronauts to Mars. They gather some rocks. Take some pictures. Then head home.
Now what?
Let's say it paves the way for colonization. Actual people move to Mars. Then what? What is the point of being there?
Unless resources of some kind are found and can be exploited, why go?
lostbook
reply to post by lostbook
Is the consensus so far "Doom" for the first settlers? What about the possibility of survival? What will it take for them to survive?
allenidaho
Let's say NASA finally sends astronauts to Mars. They gather some rocks. Take some pictures. Then head home.
Now what?
Let's say it paves the way for colonization. Actual people move to Mars. Then what? What is the point of being there?
Unless resources of some kind are found and can be exploited, why go?
Let's say it paves the way for colonization. Actual people move to Mars. Then what? What is the point of being there?
Unless resources of some kind are found and can be exploited, why go?
allenidaho
Let's say NASA finally sends astronauts to Mars. They gather some rocks. Take some pictures. Then head home.
Now what?
Let's say it paves the way for colonization. Actual people move to Mars. Then what? What is the point of being there?
Unless resources of some kind are found and can be exploited, why go?
drneville
Mission to mars, yeah right...
A moon base can't be accomplished, let's send one to mars
revolutionaryawareness
reply to post by allenidaho
I'm going to say this because this is a conspiracy forum. Mars is fake. Everything about space is fake. We build rockets, send them up and they go no where. They are GPS quided to a crash site in the ocean. The moon is a futuristic luminous projection while the sun is a light created by a much more advanced specie/human race. It shines bright enough to give heat and grow life. The stars are fake. Beyond our atmosphere is not infinite dark space and floating planets. Let alone a moon we supposedly sent astronauts to just to play golf and bounce around with a flag on. Bottom line. There is no Mars. They are training for Mars because people will actually believe it. Until all out anarchy occurs when all truths are revealed. Then it will truly be "Star Wars".