It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For some reason, President Obama hasn’t talked about this particular feature of his signature legislation. Indeed, it’s bad enough that Obamacare is projected by the Congressional Budget Office to funnel $1,071,000,000,000.00 (that’s $1.071 trillion) over the next decade (2014 to 2023) from American taxpayers, through Washington, to health insurance companies. It’s even worse that Obamacare is trying to coerce Americans into buying those same insurers’ product (although there are escape routes). It’s almost unbelievable that it will also subsidize those same insurers’ losses.
But, amazingly, it doesn’t stop there. Laszewski writes that Obamacare also contains a “Risk Corridor Program that limits overall losses for insurers.” So insurers not only don’t have to pay out all of their costs; they also don’t have to swallow all of their losses.
Laszewski explains that if an insurance company expects its costs in a given year to be X, and those costs end up being more than X plus 2 percent, taxpayers will come to that insurance company’s rescue—thanks to Obamacare. In fact, once an insurance company covers that initial 2 percent in unexpected costs, taxpayers will cover at least 80 percent of any additional costs the insurer accrues.
beezzer
reply to post by matafuchs
I called this back in November.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I hate being right.
thishereguy
beezzer
reply to post by matafuchs
I called this back in November.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I hate being right.
LOL, wasn't too hard to figure out, was it ?
Where we had people unable to afford basic healthcare, and thus clogging up the ER system as a result, driving hospital prices even higher than they already were.
matafuchs
reply to post by zeroBelief
The reason many people could not have or did not have healthcare was not so much cost but also preexisting conditions. That is what should have been addressed. Cost and preexisting. However...
1. Costs rose and did not get cheaper
2. Pre-existing coverage under the PPACA means you cannot be denied coverage but that does not mean you condition is covered
It was a tax package and should not have been. We needed regulation of the insurance companies not regulation of our citizens if you know what I mean.
butcherguy
reply to post by zeroBelief
Where we had people unable to afford basic healthcare, and thus clogging up the ER system as a result, driving hospital prices even higher than they already were.
They are still coming to the ER for the sniffles.
We paid for them then, we still pay for them now... we just pay a lot more.
The biggest change we have seen from Obamacare is the amount of money leaving our pockets. And this is just the beginning!
Now, is that something you'd like to argue, too?
beezzer
reply to post by zeroBelief
I don't see how this will improve upon anything.
People will be paying more for poorer service.
This is single-payer.
If you have any idea as to how this might improve upon the system, please elucidate!
butcherguy
reply to post by zeroBelief
Now, is that something you'd like to argue, too?
I am not arguing.
I am apparently reinforcing your point that Obamacare does not work. Sorry if that pissed you off.