reply to post by boymonkey74
It still boggles my mind that you are still sooooooo resistant
to believing even
quality scientific peer reviewed journal articles about how the plant nodes etc. are all VERY DEMONSTRABLY AND SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT
between the authentic crop circle enclosed plants vs plants outside the circles
between the authentic crop circles vs the human hoaxed.
Also, plant seeds from within the authentic circles grow significantly differently than those not within such.
Also, the bends in the plants with the drunks and boards on ropes are markedly different--sharp bends, creases, broken bends vs smooth rounded
unbroken bends for the authentic crop circles.
Also, there's usually microfine iron particles in the authentic crop circles that are not in the hoaxed and outside circle areas.
Also, the authentic circles tend to have differences in magnetic properties as well, sometimes of radiation readings compared to normal background
Here's some links . . .
I don't know that these peer reviewed reports from the religion of scientism will be the least bit respected by the religion of scientism acolytes,
high priests and bishops hereon . . . but at least they are listed for folks with some fair-mindedness and objectivity on the topic to consider
In terms of the OP crop circle . . . I thought LMH's presentation on C2C and certainly on her website
was rather convincing.
OK, I found the post about the Nvida claim of doing the thing for publicity for their new chip. Sounds convincing . . . though, IIRC, There were some
folks who went in after the field was plowed and found some plant stems to check for the nature of the bends. And, purportedly, the bends were more of
the type with the authentic crop circles.
I wonder if Nvida . . . could have been tasked with claiming to have sponsored the circle whether they did, or not.
Linda has her flaws but I think she's a pretty good researcher and that she tries to have and operate with an above average degree of integrity in
such matters. I don't see her playing any part of a hoax knowingly.
There's also the issue that in many cases with authentic circles . . . the fields have been muddy . . . and there's NO HINT of ANY footprints into or
out of the field.
That's NOT true with the hoaxed circles.
And, some of the authentic circles are toooo large and toooooooo complex to have been achievable by drunks with boards on ropes within the 40-60
minutes the circles had to be done in some cases--per observations before and after by verified responsible observers.
edit on 4/1/2014 by BO XIAN because: added
edit on 4/1/2014 by BO XIAN because: CORRECTION AFTER READING NVIDA post