It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BO XIAN
reply to post by freedom7
I'm beginning to wonder if the satanic globalist oligarchy is using some of the Destroyer in Chief's cyber warriors to provoke, identify, target
those who have a passionate believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob . . .
at least to identify and mark them for earlier extermination.
Such threads on such a site as this would be a great way and place to do that.
Personally, I want to be sure that there's plenty of evidence to convict me as a supporter of the Lord Jesus the Christ.
Even more obvious. Science doesn't support burning bushes talking.
BO XIAN
reply to post by freedom7
I'm beginning to wonder if the satanic globalist oligarchy is using some of the Destroyer in Chief's cyber warriors to provoke, identify, target
those who have a passionate believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob . . .
at least to identify and mark them for earlier extermination.
Such threads on such a site as this would be a great way and place to do that.
Personally, I want to be sure that there's plenty of evidence to convict me as a supporter of the Lord Jesus the Christ.
Sorry but when you claim Christian theology is validated through physics and cosmology you're not exactly coming from a position to be critical towards me in that way.
I came to my religious perspective long after I began studying science, and, while I came to a deistic (eventually Christian) position through physics and cosmology..
That reads to me as both your position of Deism and eventually Christianity was the result of studying physics and cosmology. That's how it reads to me. Perhaps that's my error.
If you meant at no point studying science (physics or cosmology or otherwise) aided your belief in Christianity than fine.
If it's [your belief] truly entirely faith based and entirely separate from science and therefore divorced from empirical reason how on Earth do you think you are in the position to judge me negatively for believing….well….anything…
If faith without that kind of reasoning is valid I could simply have faith in a god that supports a cyclical Universe. Faith that this god through her omnipotence and omnipresence could manipulate dark energy directly and cause a big crunch.
I'm not judging you
ignoring empirical evidence in favour of a theory that supports a pre-conceived notion. It isn't scientific when the Creationist does it, and it isn't scientific when you do it.
Let me summate my posts and my position. It's clear that although the science community doesn't currently favor the theory there is reason to believe scientifically in the possibility and I am wagering (call it a bet) the science will in the future once again favor the Big Crunch model. That's the extent of the belief I was expressing and that you say is analogous to evangelical creationists.
It's clear that although the science community doesn't currently favor creationism there is reason to believe scientifically in the possibility and I am wagering (call it a bet) the science will in the future once again favor creationism.