It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
beezzer
reply to post by Kangaruex4Ewe
Agreed. I don't have an issue with A&E. If they want to be a spineless company, then that is their right.
DelMarvel
reply to post by beezzer
I wish people would have this much dedication to free speech when it comes to people who actually have something important to say rather than some reality TV rube just running his mouth. There are many, many voices that never have a snowball's chance in hell of getting on corporate TV in the first place. Is that "right?" Who cares about a Kardashian nose job or what a duck whistle hustler has to say in the first place.
maus80
reply to post by beezzer
Ok, but I don't really get your point. If the guys at A&E terminated the contract because they believed some clouds in the sky were spelling out the words "Fire Phil", I would believe that was their right - especially if absolute termination rights were in their contract.
Is your argument that absolute termination rights in legal contracts should be banned, because some reasons for executing them might be questionable?
ltinycdancerg
reply to post by beezzer
lol oh you
actually its a leotard and tutu, not a dress- and that is a real photo of me- it complies with ATS's rules (the pic I originally wanted to use was denied b/c it was "too revealing") so I've had first hand experience with this particular issue.
daskakik
reply to post by beezzer
Threatened or alerted?
It makes a difference.
DelMarvel
reply to post by beezzer
Who cares about a Kardashian nose job or what a duck whistle hustler has to say in the first place.
daskakik
reply to post by beezzer
Not when private matters come into play.
Confidentiality agreements being one example.
beezzer
So your answer is no.
Free speech is not an option. Okay.
beezzer
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
reply to post by litterbaux
Imagine ATS if only a prescribed ideology were allowed.
daskakik
beezzer
So your answer is no.
Free speech is not an option. Okay.
It isn't just my answer, it is the truth.
In private matters you can sign away your right to free speech.edit on 22-12-2013 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
daskakik
reply to post by beezzer
I'm not moving goal posts. I'm reminding you that T&C are common in private contracts and that this creates a grey area where you claim one doesn't exist.