It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Use it and educate yourself because I am done with you and doing your footwork for you.
You have all the information you need to find the truth on your own.
I suggest you stop trolling and get cracking.
Since you didn't even go through my thread, or use your search function yet maintain I have established nothing, all you are doing is blowing brown air in a paper bag.
Once more you refused to check the Transhumanism thread I began, as evidenced by presumption of your responce, so once more...this is just more brown air in a paper bag.
Stop wasting my time.
The global climate could, in effect, be hijacked by a rogue country or even a wealthy individual, with unpredictable costs to agriculture, infrastructure and global stability.
In 2010 David Keith, director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, has proposed releasing engineered nano-sized discs in the earth’s atmosphere to “offset global warming”- and that for just $ 1 billion of your taxpayer-money annually.
Until now, scientists have mainly looked at injecting the volcano-mimicking sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere as a way to “get the maximum cooling benefit.” This new nano-particle proposal of spraying “levitating” engineered nano-particles in the atmosphere might have serious drawbacks, Keith acknowledges: “A downside of both these new ideas is they would do something that nature has never seen before. It’s easier to think of new ideas than to understand their effectiveness and environmental risks.”
“We could make the particles migrate to over the poles (…) which would have minimal bad impacts in the mid part of the planet, where we live, and do the maximum job of what we might need to do which is cooling the poles in case of planetary emergency, if you like.”
A true emergency justifies extreme measures, a narrow focus on a single problem and suspension of democratic due process.
network dude
reply to post by luxordelphi
How many people has Bill Gates killed? How many of his Geo-engineering ideas are up and running right now?
How many actual Geo-engineering programs are up and running at this time?
Please answer those so we can get to the root of the problem.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Eryiedes
Once more you refused to check the Transhumanism thread I began, as evidenced by presumption of your responce, so once more...this is just more brown air in a paper bag.
Stop wasting my time.
Maybe you can answer this for me...
In that thread you post a comment about the gates foundation yet you link to this story..
www.bloomberg.com...
Where is the connection ?
India was the first country in the world to introduce a policy to deliberately reduce population, beginning in 1952
Theorizing about how a scheme could work, and "cheaply," doesn’t mean it should be tried out just for fun, not at the expense of all life forms and the ability of the earth to sustain life.
Family Planning Association of India is funded by International Planned Parenting.
Would you like to guess who one of their largest contributors is?
Can I help you with anything else?
luxordelphi
network dude
reply to post by luxordelphi
How many people has Bill Gates killed? How many of his Geo-engineering ideas are up and running right now?
How many actual Geo-engineering programs are up and running at this time?
Please answer those so we can get to the root of the problem.
In order to begin to answer these questions for yourself I suggest beginning with the United States v. Microsoft Corp. anti-trust case. Paying some attention, also, to the way that Bill Gates first involved himself with IBM. Then, look at one of the very first visits to the U.S. by the Chinese communist elite (I think that was under Bush, Sr.) and the role that Bill Gates played in this.
As a society, we seem to create our own monsters. Or, at the very least, our elitist leaders create them for us.
As far as current geoengineering: stratospheric jet emissions. Look up and count.
zobrist
My favorite of course is "Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025" and even tho it's been sanitized for public consumption it connects the dots very well for anyone who has looked into the real reasons for geoengineering and they're not to cool the planet.
2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.
Also remember that NASA has stated, merely the jet planes alone without aluminum and barium etc., nanoparticle powders being dumped into the atmosphere in megatons, there is also the jet fuel exhaust from every sorti that creates high atmosphere cirrus type clouds that exacerbate global warming. These nanoparticles are small enough to cross the blood brain barrier (something that can and does cause all kinds of health problems) and they do not cool the planet and if anyone should know this it's David Keith. In my opinion Keith's a willing liar and has been for some years.edit on 17-12-2013 by zobrist because: Needed to mention the health issue of blood brain barrier and nanoparticles.
zobrist
reply to post by network dude
There is a list on the left side of the screen at Stop Spraying California which can help you with the chemicals in chemtrails. Of course the formulas most likely have evolved and changed. Sometimes the color of a chemtrail is quite obvious and may indicate the chemical content too. Hope this helps.
stopsprayingcalifornia.com...
Contrails are essentially clouds and are the same effect as seeing one’s breath on a cold, damp day. The narrow bands of ice crystals gradually expand into a cirrus type high altitude cloud if conditions are just right. Just how often are the conditions conducive to their formation? “At flight altitudes, conditions that support contrail-generated cirrus exist 10% – 20% of the time in clear air and within standing cirrus”4.
Oh, I forgot, you have "special eyes" and you can tell the chemical makeup of clouds form 5 miles away with just your eyes. Hey, for the record, exactly which chemicals are in those lines in the sky, and what is the density?
Awe, have I upset your man-crush on Bill?
I'm sorry you can't find a way to circumvent the facts.
Dismiss the truth all you wish...it still won't change it.
You can't lie your way out of this and neither can Gates.