It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But Kimathi has a side job. His own website is called “War on the Horizon.” There, he preaches hatred against homosexuals and whites and is literally preparing for what he believes to be the coming race war in America. Because he works for the federal government as he does with ICE (which focuses on law enforcement activities), in order to have an extra curricular activity like he does, he needs to obtain permission from his superiors. This he did by telling them that “his anti-white, anti-homosexual site, ‘War is on the Horizon,’ was just an entertainment site that sells concert and lecture videos.”
tothetenthpower
reply to post by badgerprints
But unlike the evil "man", the kids are doing it for a good cause.
Perceived as a good cause, which is no different than how "The Man" sees it.
~Tenth
kaylaluv
buster2010
kaylaluv
beezzer
kaylaluv
beezzer
kaylaluv
Gee, I wonder why ATS doesn't allow "offensive" language? Why do they remove posts that talk about how Hitler was a hero, and was right to do what he did? Why do they remove posts that bash the victims of Sandy Hook, etc.? Oppressing our freedom of speech, Shame on you, ATS!!!!!!!!!
Private club vs state university.
You're FOR this?
Look at the reasons behind it, Beezer. WHY does ATS not allow certain language? What is their reasoning behind their rules? What if I wanted to call you a certain name for someone who is not totally white? Do you think ATS would ding me for that? Why would they do that? Maybe because it would be ..... offensive?? What if you wanted to call me a certain 4-letter word reserved for females, starting with the letter C, and ending in the letters NT?
I think the student government has the same reasonings for their rule as ATS has for theirs. There is no reason to say hurtful, nasty things to each other when discussing ideas, issues, events, etc.
You should be free to say anything you wanted about me.
I don't have an obligation to listen or respond.
That's not what ATS thinks. If you are that mad about them restricting our speech, I'm surprised you haven't left the site in a huff.
What makes you think you have freedom of speech on this forum? You agreed to a set of rules when you joined this site and those rules state what you can or cannot say. I know I have been busted enough for breaking that rule.
I am very aware that we don't have freedom of speech on this forum. All those in favor of freedom of speech should leave this site in protest! Those who don't leave, really don't have as much problem with restricting speech as they claim to.
kaylaluv
I am very aware that we don't have freedom of speech on this forum. All those in favor of freedom of speech should leave this site in protest! Those who don't leave, really don't have as much problem with restricting speech as they claim to.
Advantage
...and some of us respect the person's house we are in.. particularly when that person has been gracious enough to let us know what he or she expects while we are visiting.
badgerprints
Political correctness has absolutely no correlation with courtesy.
badgerprints
Political correctness has absolutely no correlation with courtesy.
Advantage
kaylaluv
buster2010
kaylaluv
beezzer
kaylaluv
beezzer
kaylaluv
Gee, I wonder why ATS doesn't allow "offensive" language? Why do they remove posts that talk about how Hitler was a hero, and was right to do what he did? Why do they remove posts that bash the victims of Sandy Hook, etc.? Oppressing our freedom of speech, Shame on you, ATS!!!!!!!!!
Private club vs state university.
You're FOR this?
Look at the reasons behind it, Beezer. WHY does ATS not allow certain language? What is their reasoning behind their rules? What if I wanted to call you a certain name for someone who is not totally white? Do you think ATS would ding me for that? Why would they do that? Maybe because it would be ..... offensive?? What if you wanted to call me a certain 4-letter word reserved for females, starting with the letter C, and ending in the letters NT?
I think the student government has the same reasonings for their rule as ATS has for theirs. There is no reason to say hurtful, nasty things to each other when discussing ideas, issues, events, etc.
You should be free to say anything you wanted about me.
I don't have an obligation to listen or respond.
That's not what ATS thinks. If you are that mad about them restricting our speech, I'm surprised you haven't left the site in a huff.
What makes you think you have freedom of speech on this forum? You agreed to a set of rules when you joined this site and those rules state what you can or cannot say. I know I have been busted enough for breaking that rule.
I am very aware that we don't have freedom of speech on this forum. All those in favor of freedom of speech should leave this site in protest! Those who don't leave, really don't have as much problem with restricting speech as they claim to.
...and some of us respect the person's house we are in.. particularly when that person has been gracious enough to let us know what he or she expects while we are visiting.
badgerprints
Advantage
...and some of us respect the person's house we are in.. particularly when that person has been gracious enough to let us know what he or she expects while we are visiting.
I think this actually gets close to the root of the problem.
Simple courtesy isn't seen as a basic part of society any more.
People like to be perfect jackasses and then arrogantly proclaim their right to free speech as if that were an acceptable reason for treating another poorly.
Political correctness has absolutely no correlation with courtesy.
Seems like a little less nanny state and a little more personal accountability would go a long way.
This is double plus ungood.
Political correctness has absolutely no correlation with courtesy.
ketsuko
reply to post by beezzer
Let's face it - just because you're using the PC term for something doesn't change the intent you're putting behind it. You can us the PC term for something and make it sound just as ugly. The only possible difference is that PC terms haven't yet grown the negative connotations that some of their less PC counterparts have.
I find PC to be horribly condescending for the most part because the terms are put together in such a way as to try to make the person using them sound so super educated. Think about it - all of them use multiple words to replace terms that are often short and sweet, simple and uncomplicated. Why make the simple act of speaking about something so horribly complex if you aren't trying to make yourself sound smarter than anyone else in the room?
kaylaluv
This isn't a house. This is the internet. People from all over the world can view what we have written here. This isn't some private home, where it's just a couple of people and the owner.
kaylaluv
Which is better? To say "there is a problem with obesity in this country", or to say "there is a problem with all the lazy fat slugs in this country"? They both get the point across, but isn't one just a little less offensive than the other? Is it really so awful to use the word "obese", as opposed to "lazy fat slugs"? I'm not saying we should have laws against being rude, but we certainly shouldn't condone it.
kaylaluv
This isn't a house. This is the internet. People from all over the world can view what we have written here. This isn't some private home, where it's just a couple of people and the owner.
Advantage
**EPIPHANY**
Now I know why God disturbed the languages at the tower of Babel. Oh what Id give to have that particular power.
Let the fools do this. I have a 7 yr old, 15 yr old and 20 yr old. I work with teens and 20 somethings at times. One thing I know without a doubt, you tell them they cant SAY something and theyll break their necks to say the very thing you have banned. My oldest said the dreaded F word when she was younger.. I gasped in motherly horror.. she said "no mom, the one spelled FUQ". People WILL find a way.Its just more fun when you put an obstacle in front of them. Offensive speech is in the eye of the beholder and up to interpretation.. by whomever has the power ( or the paddle). Sometimes its worth the punishment to be your individual little self and not engage in group think... or endeavor to be a professionally offended whiner. Dangerous speech is a whole 'nother animal which is not even related to Offensive SPeech.. regardless of those certain people tryng to link the two. Let the fools legislate words themselves and not intent.. and get some popcorn to watch the chaos at university level. These young adults will be experiencing mob rule.. the mob tells them what they can say.. and they WILL rebel. Its just human nature to pull at the leash.