It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SecretKnowledge
Legion2024
Would there be enough matter in ISON to change the dynamic of the sun if it was to hit. And if it did would the change in fuel being burnt change the suns colour, and how much effect would that have on earth..?
No chance
it would be like an ice-cube being thrown into a big bonfire....
Or similar to that effect
yorkshirelad
SecretKnowledge
Legion2024
Would there be enough matter in ISON to change the dynamic of the sun if it was to hit. And if it did would the change in fuel being burnt change the suns colour, and how much effect would that have on earth..?
No chance
it would be like an ice-cube being thrown into a big bonfire....
Or similar to that effect
Far too generous. Try a snowflake on a bonfire!
Sorry forgot to add I am a government shill. I must be I don't believe in the ISON nonsense posted on ATS. Maybe I should have believed in Elenin then that would prove I have an open mind.......oh hang on Elenin behaved like the "shills" said NOT the "conspiracists".....hmmmmmmm
Biigs
its a rock!
daryllyn
So, there you have it, folks. ISON is just a comet, it poses no danger to earth, its not niburu, it has nothing in tow, NASA is not lying, and it will pass much like Elenin and the others... without incident.
Please stop propagating ignorance and fear mongering.edit on 26pmTue, 26 Nov 2013 16:35:04 -060013TuesdayTuesday1311 by daryllyn because: (no reason given)
When you claim ''Ison is just a comet, it poses no danger to earth'' or ''Nasa is not lying, and it will pass much like Elenin and the others... without incident''
Wtf seriously? How can you be so sure of that? How can NASA be so sure of that? Seriously, we are SO young in the discovery of the universe and we already assume we know everything.
Did you listen to the conference? Or are you just concentrating on a couple of out of context statements? Do you know specifically what he was talking about?
Why is an astrophysicist saying that we have never seen a comet like this at a JPL news conference yesterday?
Their "performance" is unpredictable, not their orbits.
I do not believe it will hit the planet, but there is a margin of unpredictability, many others seem to think it is an exact science, comets are unpredictable and that is well established
When the comet passes Earth's orbit on its outbound leg it will be high above the ecliptic, its "debris field" (usually referred to as the dust tail) will not encounter Earth. On the other hand, in January the Earth will be passsing through the region of space where the comet was at the beginning of this month. There is a slight chance that we will pass through what was left behind then...but probably not, since again, the comet was above the ecliptic at the time and its dust tail was insignificant.
the debris field which I am referring you can go to your simulation software and see it happens well after the ISON sun exit, so it has not occurred yet
Like those talking about ISON being a diamond which could produce some sort of laser effect (is one end fully mirrored and the other partially, do you actually know how a crystal laser works)? Like those who claim that it had some dramatic effect on Mars?
ISON amateurs who really have no clue.
phinubian
reply to post by daryllyn
Why is an astrophysicist saying that we have never seen a comet like this at a JPL news conference yesterday?
Also someone referred to me as doom boy, well I am far from it, I just like to deal with some reality, the debris field which I am referring you can go to your simulation software and see it happens well after the ISON sun exit
I just don't buy it if all you are doing is regurgitating and copying and pasting things you have no idea about just to get a star.edit on 27-11-2013 by phinubian because: (no reason given)
"During a breakup, comet fragments don't fly off in different directions like shards in a cinematic explosion," explains a new Comet ISON video released by the operators of NASA's famous Hubble Space Telescope. "They break off but continue to travel along the path of their parent body. So any pieces would remain far from us, millions of kilometers away."
"If a breakup happens, we may be fortunate enough to witness a beautiful 'string of pearls' in the sky, similar to what Hubble observed when the comet S-W 3 broke up in 2006," the narrator adds.
phinubian
reply to post by daryllyn
I have followed some of what this guy has to say, but I like all of your replies Phage, however, he is even unsure and this is what he does for a living.
This guy's job is to study unusual orbits and he thinks there is a chance the comet could hit earth in some models
Or am I missing something?
jlafleur02
One problem I have is that they don't know whether or not it will break up. When calculating trajectory, you need speed and mass. If it breaks up the mass will be different so the trajectory will be different. We can't possibly know if or how it will break up, what size it will break into. Right now the mass is such that it will have an orbital arc that carries it away. Reduce the mass and the arc gets tighter bringing it closer and changing speeds. We will find out when it emerges on the other side.
daryllyn
From user "hadituptohere"... I found this tidbit quoted, but couldn't find the post it came from.
When this is over, daryllyn, I'll find you and we'll talk. Oh, yes, I'll find you. We Pleiadians have special skills. Maybe you know that already.
I'm sorry.. that is just creepy.
"Oh yes, I'll find you" ... wow.
You, along with the rest of the doomers, will see that ISON will pass without incident, just like Elenin did.
PS... Please don't find me.
daryllyn
phinubian
This guy's job is to study unusual orbits and he thinks there is a chance the comet could hit earth in some models
I would love to see what he has to say, but the link only gives his information. Do you have a source for what he has to say?
Phage
reply to post by jlafleur02
No. In calculating orbits the mass of the object is irrelevant. It appears on "both sides" of the equation and is cancelled.
When calculating trajectory, you need speed and mass.
Given the same starting vector, a marble and the Moon would follow the same orbit.
edit on 11/27/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)