It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bush won the election, get over it..You are still an American, aren't you?
Originally posted by Frith
There are no attacking armies in Iraq other than the U.S./coalition/INC forces at this point in time. By that fact alone its 100% evident that the soldiers are purposefully targetting civilians. Now whether they are purposefully targetting non-combatant civilians is a different matter, but its a reality that civilians ARE the targets of the coalition's attack.
Originally posted by Frith
the UN with its resolutions did not sign off on this attack,
so its 100% illegal.
Originally posted by Gazrok
our soldiers are doing more than any other force in history to minimize casualties.
and I hope the Iraqis get a stable government, whether US puppet state or not, soon...
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The UN doesn't run the world. That corrupt cesspool likes to
think it does, but it doesn't. There is no such thing as
an illegal war just because the UN doesn't like the way things
are going.
Considering the FACT that the UN security council nea-sayers
(France, Germany, Russia) were BOUGHT OFF by Saddam with
stolen Oil for Food $$$$ - that pretty much kills any discussion
on relevance of the U.N. to anything.
BTW - According to your logic, Bill Clinton waged an illegal war
in the Balkins when he went in (without UN 'approval' and without
a coalition of any kind) and got Slobo out of the Balkins.
Originally posted by redpig01
I'd just like to know where you get illegal war out of the whole thing, the UN approved the final resolution, congress and the senate appoved the use of force, The Iraqi's spent the last 12 years doing everything they could to skirt around the treaty they signed when they lost the first time, shooting at our planes in the no fly zone. Then Koffi Annan calls the war illegal and the French/Germans/Russians opposse the war, well I guess I would too if such a personal cash cow, making me billions of $$$$$ on the oil for food was going to be cut off, but thats a whole different story.
You all say you support the troops which is fabulous, but how many of you are just as quick to condemn that Marine for doing what he did??
Originally posted by edsinger
Oil = With the money spent, we are looking at a 10+ year payback at $50 a barrel........Not a wise investement.......Oil is involved, but not for the US it is the World price that might be part of it and what saddam was doing with his ill gotten goodies.
Originally posted by edsinger
Oil = With the money spent, we are looking at a 10+ year payback at $50 a barrel........Not a wise investement.......Oil is involved, but not for the US it is the World price that might be part of it and what saddam was doing with his ill gotten goodies.
Originally posted by JamesBlonde
I can't stand Bush and his Neo-christian ultra conservative agenda
Conservative in what sense. therir behaviour in overturning commomly held values, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights seems revolutionary in some part. Neo-Christian - what's that apart from a game that 'neo - Christians' would find quite opposite
.I dont think the Iraq sitiation was handled correctly but TS, thtas the way it is. I can deal with it.
It doesn't mean we have to continue the grisly game, ad infinitum
It is a soldier's job to kill the enemy.
Not in a situation of an illegal war , with illegal acts continuing. Post-Nuremberg, it's a soldier's duty to refuse illegal orders
Why do we have to nail them to a tree everytime it happens. Could any of you do a soldiers job better? What with all the political BS adding to the strain of combat? I DONT THINK SO!
They're not Christ like figures. Just regular Joes or Jerks, obeying orders . Yeah, they don't need nailing to any tree, just the controllers who hand down the orders
[edit on 18-11-2004 by dh]
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Your position seems to be very clear LogansRun, and you call a spade a spade and engage people of a different opinion to consider the consequences of their blinkered vision. This is all very good.
But I have a question.
Are you over 30?
LOL.
Originally posted by LogansRun
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Are you over 30?
LOL.
For the record, I am 26. What is the point of your question?