It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
dragonridr
WilsonWilson
I studied history at a level and degree level.
it was pretty much accepted that the crusades for the most part were about sending the riff raff of out of europe so they wouldnt harrass the locals but would be occupied harrassing the muslims.
While some might have bought the ideological argument, it was really a matter of spring cleaning.
Well in your case i strongly suggest a refresher course. Because your clueless first in the crusades it was the nobility and people with social standing that went mostly to impress the pope in hopes of increasing there prestige. Why i can discuss but not the thread for it is it?
ScarletNyx
dragonridr
WilsonWilson
I studied history at a level and degree level.
it was pretty much accepted that the crusades for the most part were about sending the riff raff of out of europe so they wouldnt harrass the locals but would be occupied harrassing the muslims.
While some might have bought the ideological argument, it was really a matter of spring cleaning.
Well in your case i strongly suggest a refresher course. Because your clueless first in the crusades it was the nobility and people with social standing that went mostly to impress the pope in hopes of increasing there prestige. Why i can discuss but not the thread for it is it?
No, you're wrong about the nobility going. Sure they went, but it was kinda like rich kids going to Bonaroo - they went to be able to say to their friends back home "OMFG I TOTS WENT". The peasants went because they were promised to be absolved of their sins, and young sons went so they could find their fortune. Terry Jones talks about it in his Crusades documentaries, which are amazing.
And the Pope at the time, Pope Urban II, basically started the Crusades because no one liked him. Rally round that thar pope flag!