It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What about the life in a woman do they have those same rights?
Not my fault people cant read.
well it's not a buick in there.
bjax9er
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
nobody said woman were slaves either.
A state law in Illinois mandates that all bachelors should be called master, not mister, when addressed by their female counterparts.
windword
reply to post by thesaneone
What about the life in a woman do they have those same rights?
Nope. That would be impossible. One has to trump the other.
reply to post by Nephalim
Not my fault people cant read.
What is that supposed to mean?
reply to post by bjax9er
well it's not a buick in there.
It's also not a person.
don't want a child, don't do the dirty.
In 1965 The Supreme Court, in a landmark case, Griswold v. Connecticut, ruled that the Connecticut law outlawing the use of contrapction was unconstitution, and for the first time in America a married woman could legally use birth control.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
bjax9er don't want a child, don't do the dirty.
apydomis
You men and women who support abortion should be ashamed of yourselves, but you have lost any sincere and thoughtful heart to revere and protect innocence with, by extension, our society. You are the spiritual reasons that our world is crumbling. Abortion will most likely continue slaughtering our children, only because those women whom prefer death over life, are week, fearful, and selfish people. I don't know what power you think that you claim over your tiny self when you abort a human, but you are in fact shattering yourself. Prolife ideals are not the reason that you loose your hair and grind your teeth in anger. It is your complete and perfect lack of empathy and compassion and peace.
bjax9er
reply to post by OrphanApology
the "current constitution" is the same as the original constitutional.
and it IS "the law of the land"
my point is, under the constitution, the federal government has no power to decide anything having to do with abortion.
nor do they have the power to legislate anything to do with abortion, or healthcare in general.
bjax9er
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
that goes both ways.
don't want a child, don't do the dirty.
nobody said woman were slaves either.
windword
reply to post by bjax9er
I disagree. Contraception and birth control are civil rights that are protected by the US Constitution. States need to butt out of women's reproductive choices.
edit on 29-10-2013 by windword because: (no reason given)
windword
reply to post by Nephalim
The Constitution doesn't provide rights, it's identifies them and provides their protection. People tend to want to take away rights, and try to create laws that do so.
VictorVonDoom
Now if we can just get a federal judge to rule that all gun control laws are unconstitutional. Also rule that citizens should that the "right to choose" when it comes to buying insurance.
Maybe if Texas wants to restrict abortions, framing it as a tax would be the way to go. It worked for Obamacare.