It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Urantia1111
"processing error" is the best you can do once your pathetic "it's not an Apollo 9 photo" bs has been put to rest?
And your able to put his BS to rest?
Urantia1111
its already been established that the image in question is a genuine Apollo 9 photo. Zaphod admits as much, then changes his plan of attack trying to debunk this. everything is scratches and camera issues. i think it may hurt his feelings if anything more advanced than a jet aircraft were to show up somewhere.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
And to immediately go to the most far out possible thing it could be, with no evidence whatsoever, isn't logical.
Zaphod58
That's like the rock pictures. You see what you think is something, but logically is a rock, but people sit and argue that there's no way it could be a rock. It just doesn't make sense.
SasquatchHunter
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
Crosshairs are all over Apollo mission photos.
en.m.wikipedia.org...
Soylent Green Is People
Is it possible that the image was taken though the on-board sextant and telescope that the Apollo CM was equipped with?
I'm looking now for information on the telescope and sextant to see if it included a crosshair. If you look closely at the OP's image, there are vertical lines too, not just horizontal ones. I think those could be crosshair lines, and the vertical component is more blurred than the horizontal because the motion blurr may be in the horizontal direction (so the horizontal lines would not look as blurred).
The idea that this was taken through the sextant/telescope could explain why the Moon is so big in this image. The Moon is too big to be seen from Earth's orbit (which is where Apollo 9 was), so that's why I thought that it may be shot through the sextant/telescope. Maybe that also explains the greeninsh color? (or maybe not). It could also explain the blurriness of the image because holding a camera up to a telescope lens is not easy.
By the way -- here is another high resolution version of the original image that Arken has provided:
AS09-23-3500 from Apolloarchive.com
edit on 10/27/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
wmd_2008
...The only problem with that theory is it says the picture was taken using the 80mm Hasselblad lens, its more likely and error during processing or scanning but obviously on here mundane answers not good enough as for the link to the Saturn pic was that not debunked as it was a long exposure and the object was stretched due to the length of time the exposure took.
but obviously on here mundane answers not good enough
Soylent Green Is People
I wish I could find an actual picture of the Command Module's sextant/telescope. All I could find online was this recreation of it (this is an illustration -- NOT a real picture of the sextant). That being said, in this illustration of the sextant, you can see the crosshairs I am talking about:
Image Source: www.geocities.jp...
I think maybe the astronaut held the camera up to the sextant eyepiece.
edit on 10/27/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Soylent Green Is People
wmd_2008
...The only problem with that theory is it says the picture was taken using the 80mm Hasselblad lens, its more likely and error during processing or scanning but obviously on here mundane answers not good enough as for the link to the Saturn pic was that not debunked as it was a long exposure and the object was stretched due to the length of time the exposure took.
That's why I'm saying that maybe the astronaut held the camera up to the sextant eyepiece. It was a picture taken with the Hasselblad 70mm, but maybe it was a picture taken with the Hasselblad 70 mm through the sextant.
Identification
Mission: AS09 Roll: 23 Frame: 3500 Mission ID on the Film or image: AS9
Country or Geographic Name:
Features: LUNAR VIEW
Center Point Latitude: Center Point Longitude: (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Stereo: No (Yes indicates there is an adjacent picture of the same area)
ONC Map ID: JNC Map ID:
Camera
Camera Tilt:
Camera Focal Length: 80mm
Camera: HB: Hasselblad
Film: SO368 : Kodak Ektachrome MS, equivalent to 2448 Kodak Aerochrome, ASA64, thin base, fine grain.
MysterX
reply to post by wmd_2008
but obviously on here mundane answers not good enough
For the sake of dispelling hypocrisy, it seems extraordinary answers are never good enough for some on here either...so at least, there's that much in common, it's just opposite ends of the opinion spectum.
I think maybe the astronaut held the camera up to the sextant eyepiece.