It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
marg6043
reply to post by Indigo5
Oh, Indigo, I wish you were not so trusting on government and their deceiving ways, but I guess you forgot how under Obama the IRS has done more than just collecting taxes.
I am not giving off on you, my friend I like you that much.
marg6043
reply to post by Indigo5
I disagree, Indigo the IRS will have access to medical records when they have to go after individuals to check if they are meeting requarments with the Obamacare mandate AKA taxes.
Sorry for that is the truth.
Indigo5
[SNIP]
Your premise of "the government [having] carte blanche access to individual's medical records and documents?" is also wholly false.
[SNIP]
Disappointing to see someone of your status on ATS (Deny Ignorance) perpetuate and defend thorough debunked propaganda.
"National Security and Intelligence Activities Or Protective Services. We may disclose your health information to authorized federal officials who are conducting national security and intelligence activities or providing protective services to the President or other important officials."
Indigo5
ACA/Obamacare does not allow the IRS in any way, shape or fashion to acces medical records.
Explaining the PHI release ruling, HHS said Obamacare "is a government program providing public benefits, is expressly authorized to disclose PHI ... that relates to eligibility for or enrollment in the health plan to HHS for verification of applicant eligibility for minimum essential coverage as part of the eligibility determination process for advance payments of the premium tax credit or cost-sharing reductions."
Indigo5
Sorry marg...The law does not permit it, nor does logic dictate it.
a "Disclosure Manager" makes the "Decision" ?????
11.3.18.3 ...........
12. When access is requested to medical records, including psychological records, the Disclosure Manager may determine that such release could have an adverse effect on the individual, and that release will be made only to a physician authorized in writing to have access to such records.
a "processing official" ????
11.3.18.5.2 ......
4. If the request pertains to a record subject to the amendment provisions is adequate to permit processing, and the record exists and is available, a determination must be made as to whether the proposed amendments should be incorporated by considering the following:
A. The processing official should keep in mind that the portion of a record which is subject to correction because it is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete is generally the information which pertains to the individual—such as his or her education, financial transactions, medical history, criminal history, or employment history. The portion of the record must tell us something about the individual in order to be amendable. Records may contain information about other individuals, about actions taken by the IRS in regard to the individual (in a situation unrelated to tax administration), or other items which are in no way descriptive or characteristic of the individual; such information is not subject to the amendment provisions. However, the information may nevertheless be reflective upon the individual and subject to amendment if incorrect. For instance, a statement that the IRS has taken action against an individual would reflect upon the individual and should be amended if incorrect.
burdman30ott6
the fact that under the ACA the government will have carte blanche access to individual's medical records and documents?
burdman30ott6
Indigo5
Sorry marg...The law does not permit it, nor does logic dictate it.
There's your first problem right there, you're trying to apply the letter of the law to a lawless president and logic to an illogical goofball administration, congress, and law.
Indigo5
Thus a commercial showing a creepy old man probing a young ladies vagina is an accurate representation of ACA?
burdman30ott6
Indigo5
Thus a commercial showing a creepy old man probing a young ladies vagina is an accurate representation of ACA?
yes.
Indigo5
No offense, but it’s kind of useless to debate with that kind of ideologically fueled offense to rational thought and logic.
edit on 23-10-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)