It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congress Vote Fraud goes live on the air!

page: 3
54
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


I wouldn't put anything past them, it is basically how many things were passed, such as the Federal Reserve act of 1913.
That Banker Bailout was passed under a threat made by Benake himself to pass that mess.
The Un-Patriot act, was passed after the 9-11 false flag attack on the people of the US.

For them to do something else evil and sneaky is all to possible.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Kaboose
reply to post by gardener
 


I wouldn't put anything past them, it is basically how many things were passed, such as the Federal Reserve act of 1913.
That Banker Bailout was passed under a threat made by Benake himself to pass that mess.
The Un-Patriot act, was passed after the 9-11 false flag attack on the people of the US.

For them to do something else evil and sneaky is all to possible.



True, if it is any thing like they do it in the Texas state legislature,
They're a bunch of comedians down there.



No wonder ordinary folk in the viewing gallery are confused, but they did catch on.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


Twitchy Feed

Some interesting Tweets. I'm very interested about the Holly vs Diane issue. Also, I know there's a lot of issues getting an exact time for things, but if Twitter and C-SPAN have the same clock, the first Tweets came in a minute or two before Holly/Diane even stood up, then it was another minute and a half before she was taken to the hallway. And one of the first Tweets calls her a "protester." All of that said, really early Tweets also mentioned God and the Freemasons - if she changed from something else to that rant in the hallway, the change may have been very quick.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 02:55 PM
link   
reply to post by cointelprofessor
 


Seems the woman who said her name was Holly corrected it herself.



KateNocera ‏@KateNocera 16 Oct
The stenographer who started yelling was named Holly, she was taken off the floor. Members really shaken up by it...
Collapse Reply Retweet Favorite More
30
RETWEETS
6
FAVORITES andy rogersAgent Android DogGusS KQuintin WashingtonHGTomatoChannel 1 America
7:23 PM - 16 Oct 13 · Details


11 minutes later.




KateNoceraVerified account
‏@KateNocera
Correction: a lot of people have now told me the stenographers name is Diane. She yelled something about the free masons and Jesus.
Reply Retweet Favorite More
18
RETWEETS
3
FAVORITES Chris AcuffBrownJDCindy BairdSam Hirst-WadeLEAHMelissa BrownBlakeMac McCann
7:34 PM - 16 Oct 13


Shes with Buzzfeed and Politico.

twitter.com...



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Bob Sholtz
this video is evidence of the audio being blatantly dubbed over. i recommend everyone watch it.


Not only was her message dubbed but it looks like the event itself was staged. She wanted to get some message out and it never made it.

I am more interested in the vote count. Every single democrat voted to pass the senate resolution, while most republicans(by a margin of two to one) voted against it. Not a single representative voted present.

These are elected officials with honor? They are sheep!



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


I think the woman realised the numbers didn't add up because the vote had already been done by the Masons. That's why she mentioned God in her rant.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 08:44 PM
link   
This thread suddenly became interesting and scary. If this ends up to be true, then what does that say about anything else that has been voted on CSPAN? Does "Live" really mean "live"? Does this mean that say you dish up enough dirt on politicians you could effectively dub what they say or change their votes and say "if you don't play along, you're in a lot of trouble"? Didn't some judge stand up for himself after being blackmailed by Obama at some point?

I ask these questions because I think that it would provide more credibility to "conspiracies" like these, beyond just the video evidence.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Em2013
 


That supreme court judge who accused Obama of blackmailing him is the very judge who has picked most of the FISA court judges. Who do you think was blackmailing who with that knowledge?



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:22 PM
link   
Here is Diane Reidy's husband speaking about the incident. www.youtube.com...=317

Nothing said about a cover-up, just that she had a message from God. He does a background of her work history and he is very supportive of her.

I don't know if she knew something or just got fed up with everything but she obviously felt a strong conviction to speak what she felt in her heart was the right thing to say. Whatever the case I respect her for the guts she had to speak her heart in that situation.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:58 PM
link   
They called her Molly throughout the video. Diane Reidy is a damage-control name assigned by gov & media, just like the dubbing and voiceover. So, Diane Reidy's husband isn't Molly's husband. (Yes, American Gov and Media are that scandalous!)

Where to hear the stenographer's name called out:

1. House speaker addressed her as 'Molly' and then the 'Miss' talking to her trying to get her to be quiet (not that she was being loud)

2. At the elevator, quite a few women and also men, are saying Molly Molly Molly at her.

No one in the room audio/video called out DIANE even ONCE!

That's because her name is Molly, and..

www.abovetopsecret.com...




edit on 24-10-2013 by gardener because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 01:54 AM
link   
This thread doesn't make any sense.

The OP is implying that what the lady actually said was covered up, and that the women was actually talking about FRAUD?

Then why did the women give several interviews AFTERWARDS, including her HUSBAND, to various news stations, and never mentioned anything about fraud? All her and her husband said was that she felt moved to speak by the holy spirit.



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 02:57 AM
link   
are you guys serious? Honestly, why do you guys keep looking at this video? whatever you guys find, it's intended for you guys to find.

Honestly, has anyone ever thought of finding this stenographer and talking to her? Maybe doing an interview with her? Finding out where she lives? or is this person unreachable, missing off the face of the planet? If so, you guys don't think this is a serious problem if you cannot find someone in your own country?

Faq the video and look for the person herself.



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 08:35 AM
link   
I think I liked they show better when it played out like the A-Team, I don't care for this weird Soap Opera we have going now.



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 09:35 AM
link   
The truth is out there, for those who don't care to be spoon fed lies upon lies by the media & corrupt gov.

She overheard the Reporters discussing votes missing. The votes didnt add up.

She told a colleague and he supported her addressing this anyway possible.

She got up and told the house. They heard. Some lady screamed be quiet Molly (not that she was loud), then she was dragged out the room.

While she was out the room, several, several members confronted the male reporter who obviously looked like he was caught with pants down with his head down the the desk at one point in humiliation.

At the elevator, several men and women said Molly Molly (could be Holly Holly.. but definitely not Diane and what chicks do you know their names happen to mean Godly Driver of Sheep?

You already know the whole thing's a farce when the media and Congress would have you believe their elevator rings in the middle of the house floor!



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


She had planned the whole thing before setting afoot into capital hill. You can tell this by looking at a man who was speaking to her shortly before she got up and headed for the podium, then he sent a text message to someone to inform them of *mission accomplished*.

The message was dubbed over, then they escorted her out of the assembly.

The people sitting above her had nothing to do with anything. They seemed confused about what was going on rather than feeling guilty about anything.

It doesnt cheapen what she did, but we should be honest with ourselves about what transpired.
edit on 24/10/13 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 12:29 PM
link   
gee, if only there was some factual data verifying what the OP is suggesting, it might be more compelling. but, as I look at the other posts that follow, verification is not needed, it is simply believed.



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 01:33 PM
link   
I'm sorry but this is the worst video ever, and here's why:

The guy analyzing this thing is a complete fool. He's so full of himself. Right at the beginning he says how good he is at investigative stuff, and then later on..."i only had to watch this for about 2 or 3 minutes to figure out what was going on.." Oh yea Sherlock, you're suck a genius!

He's assuming sooooooo much by simply watching people's movements, he does a play by play like he's actually there, and listening in....he's way to sure of what's being discussed and reading into things way too much.

Personally I thought the hypnotism video was more credible than this.


Come on ATS, you're better than this, apply a little critical thinking, Jeez....



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 01:43 PM
link   
The video claiming hypnosis was more compelling than this one is.

I heard some of the actual audio on a MSNBC news report, including the two men that go to pull her away from the podium saying “come on Diane we have to go, come on Diane let(s) go”. In that same news report they mentioned what the conversation between her and the black gentleman most likely was, she asked him if the mic was still on. That is also why he looks shocked when she starts talking over the mic, as he was the one who told her it was still active.

She had worked there for a long time, and everyone knew her, they also knew her to be a great lady. Of course people are going to come running up to the person who was closest to what happened to ask after her. Someone that they have worked with for years just flipped out, they are going to go ask the nearest person to the scene what happened, is she okay, etc...



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 



My first post so be gentle.

Did anyone catch at 10:15 into the video that the woman in black on the second tier to the right looks down to the lady in blue and makes a "zip your lip" motion? That's the way it appears to me anyhow.



posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 02:29 PM
link   

GrantedBail
reply to post by gardener
 


Oh jeez the votes were there. It wouldn't have been brought to the floor had they not. Beating dead dogs.

Get indignant about something constructive.



Who are you to tell anyone what they should or should not be talking about? If you don't like the topic or do not agree with the topic, there are plenty of threads on ATS, I'm sure you can find one that appeals to you. I've read every comment you have made on this topic and all you do is bash everyone who agrees with this thread and tell them to find other things to talk about. Maybe some of us feel like talking about THIS TOPIC. If you don't, like I said, find another topic that appeals to you.



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join