HomerinNC
reply to post by abdctd
Okay, you claim theyre FAKE, explain and show us how they are FAKE please
Well, let's see:
#10 could very easily have been a double exposure. Just because the person who took the photo
says they didn't see anything when they took it
doesn't mean they're not lying - or even accidentally creating a double exposure. I've done it accidentally myself many years ago before digital
cameras...you don't wind the film all the way, take another picture and there is the "ghost" of the first picture on the second one. Even Mary Todd
Lincoln was scammed with a picture of dead Abraham standing behind her...by double exposure fakery.
31.media.tumblr.com...
#9 Grainy picture causing pareidolia - BTW I don't see a little boy to the left of the left arrow, I see an alien!
#8 Wasn't this already proven to be a cut-and-paste fake?
#7 To me that just looks like a picture of some chick sitting there. She's not even semi-transparent like a "ghost" is supposed to be.
#6 See #7 - just someone non-transparent standing there.
#5 Could be double exposure or just some guy in back peeking around or even a picture on the wall.
#4 Just some guy standing against the wall. Doesn't matter if "no one remembers him there"...there he is. And if he supposedly doesn't show up on
the high speed film from the same angle, why is that high speed film clip conveniently missing?
#3 Very easily done with the oldy timey cameras of the time. It took like an hour to get this picture. In that time, if you were to quickly walk to
the chair and sit there still for a minute, then quickly leave - this is the picture you would get.
#2 Kinda creepy - but then again, just because they
said no one was there doesn't mean they were telling the truth.
#1 The famous Brown Lady... long exposure combined with a little accidental shaking and overexposed lighting.
Now I am obviously not claiming that these are the absolute answers - I'm certainly not an expert, these are just more reasonable and likely
explanations in my opinion than "ghosts".