It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why are the pyramids built with the sized stones that they are?
page: 3share:
How to move the Zeppelins back and forth to the quarry...
Winds blow in the opposite direction to the flow of the Nile, so oine is wind powered one way and you tow it with a barge going down the Nile the other way.
Winds blow in the opposite direction to the flow of the Nile, so oine is wind powered one way and you tow it with a barge going down the Nile the other way.
reply to post by abacus10
....
Luckily I don't have to get into whether it was possible because there is zero evidence any of this occured.
....
Luckily I don't have to get into whether it was possible because there is zero evidence any of this occured.
Here's another interesting fact, not only do ley lines cross mountain ranges like the ALps, but if you draw the lines, you find they run directly
through all the low passes through the ALps etc..
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Bluntly untrue.
Lists of unexplained things are fully explained by this theory.
Bluntly untrue.
Lists of unexplained things are fully explained by this theory.
abacus10
Just take the stats for the Hindenburg and multiply them up for a one mile zeppelin and two, working in tandem could have lifted and moved all the stonework for the great pyramid in just under 22 years.
Lifting the stone, is about 3% of the work challenge involved in a 'stone.' 97% of the reality of a stone still exists and cannot be solved by an airship. Too much direct work content, too much labor support, too much domestic support, too much indirect support, quality and compliance inspection, training, journeyman, offtime overhead, shift management and feeding, medical, supervision, policing, taxation, administration, military to defend the population during the enormous distraction, supporting agri-community, governance and spiritual community to justify it.
20 years only works in the simple minds of the priests who fabricated the tale we all now suffer under.
This Zeppelin Theory also explains why various stones are found halfway up mountains which have temple comlexes at the top, yet there are no skidmarks
not any marks whatsoever, even nearby. With the Zeppelin theory, the stone was either dumped out or fell out the zeppelin onto the mountain side
below. SInce it was half way down the mountain, it was too low and dangerous to rescue it, so the builders just left it there and went back to the
quarry to get a new one.
reply to post by TheEthicalSkeptic
Actually no.
If you have a worldwide network of Zeppelin routes, the pilots etc could well have been trained in SOuth AMerica and be trading their zeppelin effort for Egyptian wheat.
Actually no.
If you have a worldwide network of Zeppelin routes, the pilots etc could well have been trained in SOuth AMerica and be trading their zeppelin effort for Egyptian wheat.
TheEthicalSkeptic
abacus10
Just take the stats for the Hindenburg and multiply them up for a one mile zeppelin and two, working in tandem could have lifted and moved all the stonework for the great pyramid in just under 22 years.
Lifting the stone, is about 3% of the work challenge involved in a 'stone.' 97% of the reality of a stone still exists and cannot be solved by an airship. Too much direct work content, too much labor support, too much domestic support, too much indirect support, quality and compliance inspection, training, journeyman, offtime overhead, shift management and feeding, medical, supervision, policing, taxation, administration, military to defend the population during the enormous distraction, supporting agri-community, governance and spiritual community to justify it.
20 years only works in the simple minds of the priests who fabricated the tale we all now suffer under.
No. Since all you did was post opinions without any facts, not much more to say. I already posted a source that proves it was possible, and with far fewer people than was claimed was used.
Here is another fact it explains.
Henges often are found in pairs, a big one like stonehenge and a smaller one near the river. These are always connected by what look alike a drainage duc althought ehy often run marginally uphill in places making them useless for conducting water that does not run uphill.
In this theory, this is a stone cable duct for a pure copper cable allowing electrical power to be transferred to the rive or to a small henge where a rotor could allow a primative electric drill or saw to operate, allowing repair and refilling of hydrogen for zeppelins that had just struggled across the Atlantic on the trade winds.
Henges often are found in pairs, a big one like stonehenge and a smaller one near the river. These are always connected by what look alike a drainage duc althought ehy often run marginally uphill in places making them useless for conducting water that does not run uphill.
In this theory, this is a stone cable duct for a pure copper cable allowing electrical power to be transferred to the rive or to a small henge where a rotor could allow a primative electric drill or saw to operate, allowing repair and refilling of hydrogen for zeppelins that had just struggled across the Atlantic on the trade winds.
My question - the accepted science is the Egyptians did not have the wheel.
How did they build them without the wheel?
So no tree trunks under the blocks to get them to grade - how did they do that?
How did they quarry the stone with no wheel?
Pick axes & hammers?
I need a 10 ton block of limestone 5 feet by 10 feet in the next 4 hours up 10 story's.
How do you do that without a wheel?
Just askin?
How did they build them without the wheel?
So no tree trunks under the blocks to get them to grade - how did they do that?
How did they quarry the stone with no wheel?
Pick axes & hammers?
I need a 10 ton block of limestone 5 feet by 10 feet in the next 4 hours up 10 story's.
How do you do that without a wheel?
Just askin?
Here's another curious fact...
Stonehenge was abandioned shortly after the little henge by the river was ripped up and put indside the big henge. Well, DUH1 Of course! Some dough-brain high priest thinks he can become more powerful by combiniing the two, but of course all it does is to wreck it. They cant turn the rotor arm any more and power isnt going anywhere any more.
Stonehenge was abandioned shortly after the little henge by the river was ripped up and put indside the big henge. Well, DUH1 Of course! Some dough-brain high priest thinks he can become more powerful by combiniing the two, but of course all it does is to wreck it. They cant turn the rotor arm any more and power isnt going anywhere any more.
OccamsRazor04
No. Since all you did was post opinions without any facts, not much more to say. I already posted a source that proves it was possible, and with far fewer people than was claimed was used.
Yes, I forgot that I was supposed to recognize you as a source of authority on ancient building techniques. I skipped that chapter in grad school.
reply to post by BABYBULL24
Easy...
A curious fact that people ignore about Puma Punku...
Puma Punku sits only a couple of mile from entire mountains of Basaltic Fluorspar.
Basaltic fluorspar can be used to generate Hydrofloric acid. This stuff is so vicious, it cant even be kept in a glass bottle otherwise it eats through it in seconds.
So, how did they cut and weld rock? Using Hydrofloric acid at Puma Punku and other sites. Additiionally, if a river mud clay (some are resistent) is used to create a pool of it, it is actually possible to melt the two facing sides of stones to create perfectly smooth faces and, if pushed together, they will weld together.
Easy...
A curious fact that people ignore about Puma Punku...
Puma Punku sits only a couple of mile from entire mountains of Basaltic Fluorspar.
Basaltic fluorspar can be used to generate Hydrofloric acid. This stuff is so vicious, it cant even be kept in a glass bottle otherwise it eats through it in seconds.
So, how did they cut and weld rock? Using Hydrofloric acid at Puma Punku and other sites. Additiionally, if a river mud clay (some are resistent) is used to create a pool of it, it is actually possible to melt the two facing sides of stones to create perfectly smooth faces and, if pushed together, they will weld together.
BABYBULL24
My question - the accepted science is the Egyptians did not have the wheel.
You mean the Old Kingdom? Because wheels are depicted all through the Egyptian Museum of History in Cairo.
abacus10
Here's another curious fact...
Stonehenge was abandioned shortly after the little henge by the river was ripped up and put indside the big henge. Well, DUH1 Of course! Some dough-brain high priest thinks he can become more powerful by combiniing the two, but of course all it does is to wreck it. They cant turn the rotor arm any more and power isnt going anywhere any more.
Yah - i don't follow what your sayiing.
Try it again - probably not the only 1 not picking up what your putting down.
reply to post by TheEthicalSkeptic
SO... Here are the theories...
THEORY A - Unlimited manpower. Being prepared to squander people like water, they managed to lift ludicrously heavy stones using slaves. And, in places in SOuth AMerica, they managed to lift stones half way to the mountain top without a single mark and then just abandoned them for no reason.
THEORY B - A bunch of alien flew half way across the galaxy. THey, despite their UFO's being their only way home, they risked their UFO,s by having them shift a bunch of stone up a mountain side while the locals looked on in awe.
THEORY C - A bunch of gullible aliens travelled across the galaxy to give the locals top technology of which there is no evidence to shift stones, even though, had the locals got fed up with the aliens they could have used this technology to hurt or kill their new masters...FACT: In the Old Southern slaves states, slaves were never given any access to technology beyond a broom and they were NEVER' NEVER given access to any machineery that could be used against their masters.
THEORY D - A world wide trading network developed using wood framed zeppelins that massively imporved peoples lives and henges and pyramid complexes were developed to service this fleet - a theory which answers pretty much every outstanding query and stangeness about them.
SO... Here are the theories...
THEORY A - Unlimited manpower. Being prepared to squander people like water, they managed to lift ludicrously heavy stones using slaves. And, in places in SOuth AMerica, they managed to lift stones half way to the mountain top without a single mark and then just abandoned them for no reason.
THEORY B - A bunch of alien flew half way across the galaxy. THey, despite their UFO's being their only way home, they risked their UFO,s by having them shift a bunch of stone up a mountain side while the locals looked on in awe.
THEORY C - A bunch of gullible aliens travelled across the galaxy to give the locals top technology of which there is no evidence to shift stones, even though, had the locals got fed up with the aliens they could have used this technology to hurt or kill their new masters...FACT: In the Old Southern slaves states, slaves were never given any access to technology beyond a broom and they were NEVER' NEVER given access to any machineery that could be used against their masters.
THEORY D - A world wide trading network developed using wood framed zeppelins that massively imporved peoples lives and henges and pyramid complexes were developed to service this fleet - a theory which answers pretty much every outstanding query and stangeness about them.
reply to post by BABYBULL24
From a young age, it struck me the similarity of henges and the inside of a magneto - both consisting of a ring of magnetic stones. If a rotor arm is spun in each, electricity is produced.
Incidentally, according to legend, the stones of stonehenge were originally bro9ught to their location, by being flown there from south Wales.
From a young age, it struck me the similarity of henges and the inside of a magneto - both consisting of a ring of magnetic stones. If a rotor arm is spun in each, electricity is produced.
Incidentally, according to legend, the stones of stonehenge were originally bro9ught to their location, by being flown there from south Wales.
abacus10
reply to post by TheEthicalSkeptic
SO... Here are the theories...
Theories A - D
Or the least pluralistic explanation (the one which does not force stacks and stacks of wild presumption upon presumption):
The priests who told the tale 2100 years after the fact, citing that the lesson of Khufu was 'to never cut off the tithe to the temples of Ptah" ...
... that they simply made the tale up.
edit on 20-10-2013 by TheEthicalSkeptic because: (no reason given)
...And, finally, to answer the original question...
Huge stones would be preferred by Zeppelins as a single stone is easier and quicker to load and because one does nto want a shifting load likely with lots of small stones instead of just one big one.
Huge stones would be preferred by Zeppelins as a single stone is easier and quicker to load and because one does nto want a shifting load likely with lots of small stones instead of just one big one.
abacus10
...And, finally, to answer the original question...
Huge stones would be preferred by Zeppelins as a single stone is easier and quicker to load and because one does nto want a shifting load likely with lots of small stones instead of just one big one.
And you added in the tare weight of the airship into the load calculations?
I gotta say it is creative abacus, but I think you are romanticizing how wield-able and effective an airship may indeed be.
But the imagination is fun, AND - sometimes a breakthrough can be achieved in this type of thought, even if at face value it might not totally win.