It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rep King argued that President Obama himself used the term during a health care summit at Blair House last year. “President Obama called it ObamaCare. I know he uses his middle name but no one else can, but he’s named it ObamaCare and that’s the only way to describe it. It’s the best way to describe it.” The President did reference the term, saying, “It turns out that more Americans are now getting their health care coverage from government than those that are getting it from the private sector. And you know what, that’s without a bill from the Democrats or from President Obama. Has nothing to do with “Obamacare.”
But why not just call it the Affordable Care Act? “It’s not affordable in the first place,” King replied. “It’s $2.6 trillion in spending over the first ten years, so that doesn’t work. I don’t know what else to call it.” “It’s an over-spending bill that is the largest taking of American liberty in the history of the United States. It takes away our ability to control our own health. It’s a nationalization of our skin and everything inside it – and it’s a ten percent tax on the outside if you go to the tanning salon. I’ve called it a malignant tumor that threatens to metastasize. All of that’s under the moniker ObamaCare. But the other side has argued and defended it, so if they were successful, they wouldn’t think the term ObamaCare was pejorative,” King added.
xuenchen
Interest in Obamacare Drops 88 Percent in Two Weeks
There's some indications that 'ObamaCare' is losing steam.
Big drop in HealthCare.gov Web site visitation.
Very low enrollment.
Is this whole thing a failure ?
How *popular* is it REALLY ?
A new estimate by an independent web analysis firm says public interest in Healthcare.gov is waning.
According to the Washington Post "The number of visitors to the federal government’s HealthCare.gov Web site dropped 88 percent between Oct. 1 and Oct. 13..." The site reportedly drew 9.4 million unique visitors in its first week of operation but in the 2nd week "the site attracted 4.1 million visitors, or less than half of what it garnered its first week."
The Obama administration has repeatedly refused to say how many people have signed up for coverage on the federal exchange. Their sole response to questions about enrollment is to cite the total number of unique visitors to the website and claim this shows "intense demand." But looked at over time it is clear that demand is declining fairly quickly, at about the pace one might expect box office receipts of a new film to drop off week after week.
Interest in Obamacare Drops 88 Percent in Two Weeks
And, what's with the low sign up rates ?
We were told that something like 40 million people have no insurance.
Less than half of one percent of HealthCare.gov visitors were able to enroll for health insurance during the first week of Obamacare. According to Kantar US Insights and nonpartisan research firm Millward Brown Digital, Healthcare.gov had 9.47 million visitors but only 36,000 who completed enrollment in week one.
One Obama Administration Obama official said the reports were “inaccurate.” Aneesh Chopra, President Obama’s first Chief Technology Officer said that although the numbers were interesting what really matters is that one million Americans registered to the site. "Account creation is always the holy grail. That’s the moment that matters," he commented in an interview.
Less Than Half of One Percent of HealthCare.gov Visitors Complete Obamacare Enrollment
The question may be;
How *BIG* is the failure ?
How much will Failure cost ?
And, who gets to keep the money ?
xuenchen
buster2010
It's no surprise that the number dropped. For one the site was broken and parts of it was shutdown. And none of the applications was being processed due to the shutdown. How many people are going to go through the process of filling everything out when nothing is going to be done about it.
How do you feel about having to pay for that ?
And how do you feel about others having to pay for the mistakes and debacles and boondoggles ?
Shutdown ?
If the 'shutdown' affected enrollment, how did people enroll at all ?
There are claims of 'thousands' successfully signing up.
Hmmm.
xuenchen
There's some indications that 'ObamaCare' is losing steam.
onequestion
I just dont understand why people are against gun registration and health insurance but they dont vigorously follow that same argument with car insurance and registration.
Can someone explain this to me?
xuenchen
There's some indications that 'ObamaCare' is losing steam.
FlyersFan
NOT TRUE!!
Here in Delaware we had NO ONE signed up as of yesterday.
As of today we had ONE PERSON signed up
So our numbers are growing!! (sarcasm .... obviously)
onequestion
reply to post by buster2010
I dont see why we shouldnt appropriate our tax dollars from war to healthcare. Or paying congress to healthcare for that matter.
Does anyone else in America see how under control we are?
buster2010
You do know Bush started the phone program not Obama right?
The cell phone distribution program did begin in 2008, the year Obama was elected president, but that is a coincidence. Let’s look more closely at the facts. Notice that earlier we said Link-Up helps fund “installation.” What installation does a cell phone have? None. So why is installation part of Link-Up, which is under the Lifeline program umbrella? Because, the whole thing began back in 1996 when the Federal Communications Commission authorized the programs for landline phones. At that time it provided discounts on landline phones only, for obvious reasons. To this day the government provides discounts on landline phones for financially disadvantaged people in the United States and U.S. territories. The Link-Up portion helps with the installation and the Lifeline Assistance part helps with the monthly bills, to the tune of roughly ten dollars a month. So, the subsidization of phones began under President Clinton, and has continued under Presidents Bush and Obama.
Is that a 'suggestion' to expand MediCare step by step (age by age) ?
How would that work ?
I wonder if the payroll tax increase would be cheaper than the corruptions of PPACA.
Alxandro
dollukka
What will happen to Obamacare when Obama has served his second term ? Will the next POTUS keep program alive or bury it to the deepest sinkhole they can find? If that happens would it be quite embarrassing...
Just like Global Warming got renamed to Climate Change once people realized it was a scam, this nightmare known as ObamaCare will be renamed the Un-Affordable Care Act.