It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wewillallbefree
I 100% in my eyes the marginalization of those who suffered at the hands of the Nazi's was a Zionist manipulation of the the event to gain Israel moral teflon for what was about to come.
General George S. Patton commented in his diary "I’m also opposed to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign lands (in particular, to France) where many will be starved to death." He also noted "It is amusing to recall that we fought the revolution in defense of the rights of man and the civil war to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles".[22] On 12 October 1945 The New York Herald Tribune reported that the French were starving their POWs, and compared their emaciation to that of those liberated from the Dachau concentration camp.[24]
crawley
Now sit back and watch the jdl tear this thread apart.
neformore
Wewillallbefree
So the holocaust is the one historical event where laws are necessary ? A lot of racially motivated genocides/crimes against humanity have taken place over the history and this is the one that gets pinned to the do not challenge the facts board? I assure you, I have no sympathy for the Nazi's, what I do have though is questions, as do many historians.
Another favourite tactic is to try and single this out as exclusive and out of context in this manner. What other countries and area's choose to adopt as law where they are is their business. The sheer scale and destruction wrought by WW2 in Europe caused by the actions of a facistisc ideaology left many deep scars and caused the division of a continent for nearly three generations. Of course the lawmakers following on from that are going to try and prevent such things happening again. To suggest that they do otherwise is ludicrous and goes against rational human nature.
I guess you'll try and suggest that this is pinned as an exclusive genocide. Its not. There have been many others across history, but none of them happened in Germany in Europe in the middle of the single biggest conflict the world has ever seen, and that means that this one draws more attention than others.
As for this
Leave all the emotional feedback out of this, and look at the facts, and the scientific analysis that has been done by brave researchers.
I've done more holocaust research than an awful lot of people so what's your point?
An observation here - this....
And I assure you, I have no agenda.
and this
One only need look up from his desk once in a while to see that there is a considerable amount of control in all facets of life, especially government in Jewish hands.
Doesn't quite tally.
Please... draw me up a list of all significant events in WW2 in the historical record that you don't agree with that don't involve jewish people, and lets debate those shall we?
edit on 16/10/13 by neformore because: (no reason given)
sdcigarpig
The Op asked the question if the Tea Party should break off and form their own political party.
sdcigarpig
It is cause of those who either survived, witnessed or knew about such that are still around. Too many of those in the countries that are listed do not really want the truth out fully.edit on 16-10-2013 by sdcigarpig because: Wrong posting and needed to edit it out
FlyersFan
sdcigarpig
The Op asked the question if the Tea Party should break off and form their own political party.
Sorry bud ... wrong thread.
. Right On! Let's wake up and smell the PROPAGANDA!
crazyewok
Wewillallbefree
I 100% in my eyes the marginalization of those who suffered at the hands of the Nazi's was a Zionist manipulation of the the event to gain Israel moral teflon for what was about to come.
I know in history its seem to be JEWS JEWS JEWS!!!!!!!!!
And alittle mention of the others.
The SS wiped out whole villages in Poland cause there were too "slavic" and butched countless Ukranians and Russians. Not to mention any group that wasnt Aryan and NAZI. Hell I belive there was plans to even get rid of the french eventually.
. I think its just a shout out to absurdity. Hail Discordia
Wewillallbefree
What does this have to do with Holocaust revisionist theory law?
sdcigarpig
It is cause of those who either survived, witnessed or knew about such that are still around. Too many of those in the countries that are listed do not really want the truth out fully.edit on 16-10-2013 by sdcigarpig because: Wrong posting and needed to edit it out
sheepslayer247
reply to post by smurfy
I dont think anyone is denying the reality that it happened. But if the facts are skewed or the numbers are off...what is wrong with asking why?
Could it be that behind the death and pain, there was a much deeper conspiracy that some people would rather not see drug to the surface?
. What about the generations of Germans that had nothing to do with the NAZIS? Why should should they stilli endure the shame of the actions of their grandparents and great grandparents? Why must we STILL commit our consciousness to envocing the memory of this evil regime? Clearly there is a conspiracy as surely as there is an ATS.
Astrocyte
reply to post by alldaylong
Perhaps. But then again, the Chinese "holocaust" at the hands of Japan is more well known in China than the German holocaust.
In a way, as westerners, you would expect us to be more informed about the German genocide of the Jews than the Japanese one.
intrepid
buster2010
And the old videos were a setup just like the flag raising at Iwo Jima. The story of six million dead was already being spread around before WW2 even started.
Is that provable? Links please.
LeBombDiggity
buster2010Show me once official document from WW2 ordering the holocaust. There is none. The archivist have never been able to find any documents from Hitler ordering the holocaust.
That's because Hitler wasn't daft enough to put his name to such an upfront order.
He didn't have to anyway. Everyone under him knew his intentions, he wanted the Jews exterminated like lice. So when his underlings, like Goebbels, wrote in their diaries about their conversations with the Fuhrer, that Hitler wanted the Jews of Europe annihilated, that the Jews were to blame for their own extermination, that by their annihilation the National Socialists were doing humanity a great service, that there was no room for sentiment etc etc etc ... you think such diary entries are unreliable ? Why would Goebbels write lies about a man he so adored ?