It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“In very practical terms it means Sunday Mass won’t be offered,” Archbishop Timothy Broglio of the Archdiocese for the Military Services told me. “If someone has a baptism scheduled, it won’t be celebrated.”
“They were told they cannot function because those are contracted services and since there’s no funding they can’t do it – even if they volunteer,” he said.
A well-placed source told me that a furloughed Air Force chaplain was threatened after he offered to forgo pay. The chaplain was told he could not go on base or enter his chapel offices. He was also barred from engaging in any ministry activity.
“The wedding could be on the base, but the priest can’t do the wedding,” Broglio told me.
“In American history there has been no administration more anti-Catholic than the Obama administration,” he said. “For them to deny Catholic men and women the opportunity of the sacraments and to deal with their prayerful vocations is really a stunning statement.”
I find it odd that the military was able to find enough cash to let their football teams play this weekend – but they can’t scrounge up enough cash for weekend church services.
BOPcaj
government shouldnt have anything to do with religion in my opinion.
separation of church and state.
FlyersFan
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Okay .. what I don't understand ...
When I was in the military, the Chaplains were all US Military ... they were officers. For example, when I was stationed in Japan we had a Colonel, Major, Captain (Protestant Chaplains) and a Lt. Colonel (Catholic Priest). So how would a furlough effect people who are actually in the military? Unless the people in the article are people who are on CONTRACT to come in because there aren't enough Catholic chaplains???
FlyersFan
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Okay .. what I don't understand ...
When I was in the military, the Chaplains were all US Military ... they were officers. For example, when I was stationed in Japan we had a Colonel, Major, Captain (Protestant Chaplains) and a Lt. Colonel (Catholic Priest). So how would a furlough effect people who are actually in the military? Unless the people in the article are people who are on CONTRACT to come in because there aren't enough Catholic chaplains???
aboutface
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Wow, just wow! When I see news like this and two of the MSM are carrying it, then it has to be fed to them by TPTB, IMHO. It would seem that someone has an agenda to disgust and harass the populace big time, as other here on ATS have already noted.
Freedom of religion is now being attacked. Wasn't it Nancy Pelosi who said a few days ago that people should pursue happiness? Guess they're leaving that one (happiness) alone for now.
buster2010
These people are not in the military they are contract workers so they are subject to the same rules as any other contract worker. And nothing is stopping these people from getting married off base the military doesn't control that guess the usual unnamed source at FOX never thought of that. The usual Obama is against Christians rhetoric is really getting old we wouldn't be hearing half of it if people just did a little research.
buster2010
aboutface
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Wow, just wow! When I see news like this and two of the MSM are carrying it, then it has to be fed to them by TPTB, IMHO. It would seem that someone has an agenda to disgust and harass the populace big time, as other here on ATS have already noted.
Freedom of religion is now being attacked. Wasn't it Nancy Pelosi who said a few days ago that people should pursue happiness? Guess they're leaving that one (happiness) alone for now.
Freedom of religion is not being attacked here. A unnecessary paid for service is being suspend during the shutdown if these Priests were in the military then there would be no problem. The ones that are attacking your religion are the Priests that put a price on their faith.
“Most of us don’t look to see that we’re going to be paid before we do something,” he said. “They are not being allowed to volunteer even to meet the needs of the faithful.”
roadgravel
Why is the government paying for religion. The religions can supply at no cost their own services if they so desire. Religion is a business but the gov doesn't need to be paying.
Valid question. Has nothing to do with the topic though as the priests are offering their services for free, and are being told if they show up they will be arrested.
roadgravel
Valid question. Has nothing to do with the topic though as the priests are offering their services for free, and are being told if they show up they will be arrested.
Off topic? The topic opens up a deeper issue of why is there a pay check. It should be free always.
OccamsRazor04
buster2010
These people are not in the military they are contract workers so they are subject to the same rules as any other contract worker. And nothing is stopping these people from getting married off base the military doesn't control that guess the usual unnamed source at FOX never thought of that. The usual Obama is against Christians rhetoric is really getting old we wouldn't be hearing half of it if people just did a little research.
Or maybe your partisan blinders are just too thick to see past. The article states they have that option. They can also go through with the wedding on base, they just can't have their priest perform the ceremony.
So tell me, what benefit is there to disallowing a Priest to come without pay? While they may legally have the right to do this, why would they?
And it's not FOX claiming Obama is anti-Christian, it's Bill Donohue, of the Catholic League claiming it.edit on 5-10-2013 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)
buster2010
OccamsRazor04
buster2010
These people are not in the military they are contract workers so they are subject to the same rules as any other contract worker. And nothing is stopping these people from getting married off base the military doesn't control that guess the usual unnamed source at FOX never thought of that. The usual Obama is against Christians rhetoric is really getting old we wouldn't be hearing half of it if people just did a little research.
Or maybe your partisan blinders are just too thick to see past. The article states they have that option. They can also go through with the wedding on base, they just can't have their priest perform the ceremony.
So tell me, what benefit is there to disallowing a Priest to come without pay? While they may legally have the right to do this, why would they?
And it's not FOX claiming Obama is anti-Christian, it's Bill Donohue, of the Catholic League claiming it.edit on 5-10-2013 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)
Because if that Priest were to get hurt or anything else were to happen to them while they were on the base that would open the government to a huge lawsuit. And no they do not legally have the right to do it. Military bases are government property so their religious freedoms are what the government says they are because the government shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion. Other government employees are not allowed on base while on furlough and the same goes for the Priest they are just another government employee.