It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
According to a top-secret NSA document obtained by The Hindu, the NSA selected India’s U.N. office and the embassy as “location target” for infiltrating their computers and telephones with hi-tech bugs, which might have given them access to vast quantities of Internet traffic, e-mails, telephone and office conversations and even official documents stored digitally.
Since the NSA revelations began in June, U.S. President Barack Obama and other top American officials have all claimed that the surveillance activities were aimed exclusively at preventing terrorist attacks. But the targeted spying of Indian diplomatic buildings could have been done for political and commercial reasons — not the core responsibility of the NSA.
The “secret” 3G chip that Intel added to its processors in 2011 caused little consternation until the NSA spying issue exploded earlier this year as a result of Edward Snowden’s revelations.
In a promotional video for the technology, Intel brags that the chips actually offer enhanced security because they don’t require computers to be “powered on” and allow problems to be fixed remotely. The promo also highlights the ability for an administrator to shut down PCs remotely “even if the PC is not connected to the network,” as well as the ability to bypass hard drive encryption.
“Intel actually embedded the 3G radio chip in order to enable its Anti Theft 3.0 technology. And since that technology is found on every Core i3/i5/i7 CPU after Sandy Bridge, that means a lot of CPUs, not just new vPro, might have a secret 3G connection nobody knew about until now,”reports Softpedia.edit on 26-9-2013 by YodHeVauHe because: (no reason given)
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Glassbender777
Yeah.. No kidding.... I never actually looked at "Enemy of the State" as having much truth in it. About as accurate, I figured, as the Bourne movies. Sure..there is something at the heart of the concept which is true, but not much more.
These days? I have to rethink and perhaps go rent that movie again. It'll be a different viewing experience after recent revelations in the real world, eh?
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Bedlam
This is the same NSA that doesn't spy on American citizens ... Doesn't spy on our allies in their own offices and embassies...and absolutely doesn't keep records of communications between domestic parties...err.. wait.. they do all that after all, huh? Just learned all that....didn't we?
I think that was a good lesson in never underestimating or saying "don't do" when it comes to Uncle and his spooky children.
That's the agency you're sure is unarmed, peaceful and benign? Okay... I'll just assume they aren't, if that's okay.
Short of working for them to know as an insider? I'll never assume any part of U.S. Intelligence doesn't have in-house paramilitary capability. Perhaps small....but the idea that the NSA would have to call a total outside agency for basic help on a security problem is pretty hard to buy? They've become a power unto themselves since the unlimited budgets of the War on Terror turned them into a regular monster.