It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Every judge that sentences a murderer has to be a murderer first?
Every time I want to shoot a stray or wild dog I have to wonder around sniffing garbage cans first? Or can I sniff cans once and the effect lasts for a few weeks?
Every policeman that nabs a doper has to be a user?
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
LTD posted. . . as I have said countless times: Unless you are a Mason, you have no basis on which to judge the principles and foundations of Masonry. . .
Sure-
Every judge that sentences a murderer has to be a murderer first?
Every time I want to shoot a stray or wild dog I have to wonder around sniffing garbage cans first?
Or can I sniff cans once and the effect lasts for a few weeks?
Every policeman that nabs a doper has to be a user?
LTD you have been spouting masonisms for months, yet you were NOT a mason.
So, it's O.K. to be pro-anything without experience but not anti?
You were in the Ku Klux Klan when?
Does this really mean that I should encourage my fellow masons to divulge their secrets to me so that I can ��allegorically�� die by ratting them out?
Is this kind of like- lie to my fellow mason to maintain the sanctity of my allegorical oath?
Wow, this will take some getting used to. No wonder I have such a hard time following this masonic stuff.
I sure am glad that is cleared up- I worried for nothing.
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
...if this is NOT an oath to protect secrets nothing is. Imagine yourself called as a witness against a MM- the guy is a lodge brother and confided in you that he just needed someone to talk to- so ��- - - - yak, yak�� you now know his story. Are you going to out him?
Or maybe its contract by fraudulent means?
Not being a lawyer I wouldn't really know. According to some I could be considered an anti-mason. I have never considered myself as such.
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
JaseP that's good- one of the best slams against anyone for NOT being a mason.
To follow your logic someone would be a fool or raving religious (zealot comes to mind) case if they did not embrace masonry, is this right?
I'll pass on your analogy to the �G� because I've really never heard that.
Back to your religious views-
I disagree with you. I disagree with you on the religious scenario you painted and I disagree that religion could be the only - - - oh wait, I get it-
��the only reason I can respect��
O.K., fair enough. If someone is a raving religious thumper (by any name or term) you respect them not being a mason, other than that you don't respect their reason- right?
By extrapolation, would it be fair to say then that other than the religious reason you don't respect that person (for not being a mason)?
If true, then fine by me.
As to someone quitting masonry- quit is quit, this demit thing is just another masonry requirement. After all, we are not talking breach of contract here, are we?
Or maybe its contract by fraudulent means?
Not being a lawyer I wouldn't really know. According to some I could be considered an anti-mason. I have never considered myself as such.
Originally posted by Bondi
This is a conspiracy orientated site, therefore people here will predominantly see the conspiracy in everything and everything, whether it's freemasonry or the teletubbies.
Originally posted by Janus
Damn Tinky-Winky! Damn him all to Hell!! Him and his Nefarious cohorts must be destroyed!
Just what is in that bag anyway? The plans for World Domination?