It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
amazing
Why wouldn't anyone want another independent investigation? Unless they had something to hide? Anyone who opposes an independent investigation should be...hmmm...questioned. Why would you oppose it? It's not money. We through billions at all kinds of crap, what's a couple million on this? Nothing. Money is not the issue. People have things to hide.
spooky24
Yes, he does a very good job of proving my point. Again, highlighting individual events, without proving anything other than the small event without, even mentioning, the how or the why, better said the beginning and the end. It's always the same thing that is immediately ignored because no timeline leading to, and coming from the highlighted event. That simply does not fly and hasn't for 12 years. Always showing the middle of the race without even mentioning the beginning and the end.
That is the oblivious reason that the 'truther' movement is stuck where it is and will always be stuck because of cherry picking events to challenge while ignoring the how and the why. The only way to present videos and sell worthless books is this pattern because they can't prove anything-just criticize individual events. Arguing the building didn't fall because of some office fires isn't worth a damn without saying how it fell, why it fell and what force made it fall.
This guy is just like all the others, and will be ignored just like the others, because if building 7 didn't fall because of fires, than what in the hell made it fall-how did it get there and where is it afterward.