It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OtherSideOfTheCoin
NeoParadigm
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
you think the planes were faked?
Very perceptive! What gave it away?
The reason I was actually asking you if you believed in the "no planes" theory was because I personally refuse to even enter into any debate about "no planes" in any debate regarding 9/11 because I think it is so hurtfully disrespectful to the dead. It sickens me to my stomach that it has became OK now to say whatever the hell you like about 9/11 online with out any regard to how it will hurt the victims families. How would you feel if I was running rampant online saying that your last conversation with your son or wife was a lie?
The second reason I refuse to discuss it is because frankly I am not stupid enough to be able to lower myself to debating such a absurd notion. A IQ of about 10 and a working eye should tell you that planes did hit the buildings and that they were not faked so if someone can't even accept from a starting point that yes planes did hit the buildings then I dont see any point in debating the point with that person because there is no way I am going to get a intelligent response.
"no planes" are the lowest of the low when it comes to 9/11, I have explained my position on this and for the reasons outlined above please do not expect me to continue any further discusion with you regarding "no planes" in this thread.
OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
I
If however there is another aspect of 9/11 you wish to discuss with me that does not imply fake victims such as the destruction of the buildings then I will happily do so.
The reason I was actually asking you if you believed in the "no planes" theory was because I personally refuse to even enter into any debate about "no planes"
NeoParadigm
reply to post by wmd_2008
I don't know why you are talking to me, it's not my thread nor did I support its premise.
NeoParadigm
So you are saying that the wing actually did go behind the bulding?
NeoParadigm
Like all 911 footage, it is fake though. For a myriad of reasons, like applying the laws of physics and common sense.
I will be back for more in depth
NeoParadigm So you are saying that the wing actually did go behind the bulding?
You are right, the building is in front of the WTC.
He sai it is in front and it is. Let's not argue over facts that can be easily looked up on google or Google Earth.
Now anyone knowing anything about the size of the WTC towers should realise that the building in the video could never be behind the towers as claimed in the video.
So please post of your physics/common sense evidence?
NeoParadigm
So please post of your physics/common sense evidence?
I already did. Planes don't just vanish into buildings without any resistance and deformation and parts like the wings falling off.
NeoParadigm
I already did. Planes don't just vanish into buildings without any resistance and deformation and parts like the wings falling off.
There was MASSIVE deformation it was DESTROYED do you think the parts of the aircraft that hit the windows bounced off or something .
NeoParadigm
reply to post by wmd_2008
There was MASSIVE deformation it was DESTROYED do you think the parts of the aircraft that hit the windows bounced off or something .
No it went right through the building as if it wasn't there, without any deformation or angle change, as one can see in the pics I posted.
Your argument that it was destroyed is off course not even valid in this discussion about faked footage. I obviously am talking about the plane's behavior in the footage.
Why would the wings "fall off"? You mean they would just fall to the ground? That's ridiculous.