Newborn Baby Seized by Hospital and Police Because Mother Questioned Vaccine

I am not sure if this is the right forum for this post. I'd love a "Heavy hand of Government" section. Mods move it if needed, thanks.

This is a disturbing story and it seems to be happening more and more. Hospitals apparently lying to parents abut the law, what they are doing, and calling for CPS and the cops to take custody of children whose parents are anti-vaccine or asking questions. Here is the story:

I am not content to sit on the sidelines while the government gradually usurps the very essence of parental rights. I hope you share my determination. We need to stand with people like Scott and Jodi Ferris (obviously no relation to someone named Farris). Here’s their story:

Jodi went into labor a bit earlier than she had expected—and the baby was coming rapidly. Given their location and other factors, the midwife they had hoped would deliver the baby at their home encouraged them to get in an ambulance and head to the hospital.

Their baby, whom I will call “Annie,” was born in the ambulance in the parking lot of the Hershey Medical Center—a government hospital in Pennsylvania. Hospital personnel arrived very quickly and took charge of both baby and mom.

As any mother would do, Jodi immediately began to ask the nurses and attendants how her baby was doing. The hospital staff was utterly unresponsive. When they started to give Jodi an injection, she asked what it was and what it was for. They gave her vague answers like, “It’s just to help.” Only after giving her the injection of oxytocin did they tell her what it was and then asked, “You aren’t allergic to that are you?”

&action_type_map=[%2210201100535968889%22%3A%22og.l ikes%22]&action_ref_map=[]]Read Full story

Oxytocin is administered seconds before the end of second stage (in most cases head out only), to speed up the deivery of the placenta, it is entirely optional....as the mother produces it naturally, it would be impossible to be allergic.

Vitamin K consent, is usually given during labour, it is entirely optional, I allowed both my children to have it, as there seemed to be nothing but benefit.

It must be the HepB vaccine which has caused the problems in this case, although I would be amazed if the mother would be discharged, given the child needed to be nursed and would be remaining there, regardless of the child protection claims.

Certainly wouldnt happen in the U.K, well at least not in the city I live anyway.

Best guess is, they might have been known to social services (they had other kids too) .

Think the article may not tell the full story ???

[SNIP]

Go ahead and actually 'read' the Op's link. It has nothing to do with what was injected in the Mom but about the control and subsequent confusion surrounding a betrayal by the system and a furtherance of the corrosive rights and freedoms of all parents who chose to not vaccine indiscriminately or in this case to give a newborn Hep -B vaccine against the parents wishes.

Although this story may not contain all of the proper facts relating to why the hospital initiated these steps against the new parent and the newborn, they had done nothing wrong legally to have been separated from the new born. Seems we are witness to Guilty until proven innocent more and more.

reply to post by Phage
Why would you give a woman who just delivered a baby oxytocin? You might want to start there.

I have been a registered nurse for 30 years - you do not give a patient a shot of anything without telling them what it is - unless they are unconscious.

What a horrible story - I am disgusted. Take the hospital to court, they are doing harm to the babies and parents alike.

reply to post by Phage

Oxytocin is not a vaccine. You might want to start there.

No it isn't about oxytocin, it is about an obtuse self-righteous power-hungry social worker who called the police to have the parents escorted off the grounds of the hospital and kept the baby! (Not quite, there were more people involved but that is a reasonable summary)

She ended up having to sleep in her car and come in every 3 hours to nurse!

Yet another reason to give birth at home.

My 6 year old son was receiving his shots before school started a few years ago. I had a form from school telling me what he needed in order to attend. The nurses had "extra" vaccines listed down on their forms than what was on the schools required shots form.

I asked them what it was and they told me he was due for more vaccines. I told the nurse , well I am sorry I am here to get the required shots for my son to attend school. Those "extra" vaccines that you have is not listed on the schools form so therefore he will not be receiving these "extra" vaccines.

The nurse said sir he is required to have these vaccines by law . I told her listen lady you WILL NOT be giving him anymore shots other than what is listed on this form. She argued with me back and forth and in the end we walked out of that Dr office without getting those "Extra" vaccines .

They will tell you anything and lie to you in order to trick you into getting these so called "extra" vaccines. They also tried to give him the swine flu vaccine and the normal flu vaccine every year. I told them he was highly allergic to the flu shot and he swells up and breaks out so he cannot get these flu shots. So far that has worked without causing any issues.

Kinda funny because he has never had the flu his entire life and he is 8 years old.

reply to post by antar

Although this story may not contain all of the proper facts relating to why the hospital initiated these steps against the new parent and the newborn, they had done nothing wrong legally to have been separated from the new born

Maybe. But all we have to go on is what an attorney (who is asking for donations) has to say about it. Isn't it? And, of course, an attorney would never distort anything to favor his client.

reply to post by apoc36


The same kind of BS is being used in the UK. So many parents now think they are breaking the law if they refuse the shots.
Quite recently I was standing in the checkout line at my local and two (separate) mothers walked past with very young children screaming their little lungs out.
I was taken aback when the elderly lady who was behind me in the queue said "Its the vaccines". I'm 100% anti vac so I asked her what she meant. She said "Children were different back then, much more contented, but now look at them, they're not normal".

This isn't the first time I've heard the elderly make such comments. It seems someone with a long enough life span can actually see a difference!

reply to post by VoidHawk


What exactly are they pumping into our infants?

We can guess that they are attempting to make them infertile, but maybe they are injecting metals to make them susceptible to "mind control" methods.

Sounds crazy, but -

I'm so glad I'm not having children - and I hope by the time my granddaughter is of child bearing age - the illumanati has collapsed - better to live on a farm than the new world order these psychopaths have devised for us.

reply to post by VoidHawk


Or, it could be that more and more women are single mothers, working mothers, busy, burnt out, distracted, etc., on their way home from work, pick up the kid from day care, stop at the local store for dinner supplies............

Or, it could be vaccines....

i know in the u.k the goverment does not own your child until you sign the birth certificate and they make this law that you have to register the childs birth .

i have watched as people who got the swine flu shot come down with cancer never had a jab in school and never needed one i would not even give my dogs a injection and they all lived till they were old

Phage
reply to post by UnifiedSerenity

 

Oxytocin is not a vaccine. You might want to start there.

edit on 9/10/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

nitpicking?
I thought such was beneath you, Grand Inquisitor [C.o.S]?
guess not.

you're certainly blinded by something and it's not just science

reply to post by Phage


I can only deduce by your comment that you did not read the whole article. It is against T&S to quote very much of an offsite article, and thus I kept with the sites rules. If anyone bothers to actually read the article, it becomes quite clear this was very abusive behavior by the hospital staff and the social worker.

They wanted to force vaccinate a child for Hep B despite the vaccine wearing off well before the child would be sexually active and the mother asked to be tested to see if she was actually carrying Hep B which might put the baby at risk. The hospital said they could not wait, which is a complete lie.

Here is another portion of the article.

Thrown Out

And then the story turns ugly. The social worker left the room and called the police. Without a court order they took custody of Annie, immediately claiming that she was suffering from illness or injury—a patently false claim. The social worker consented to the administration of the Hepatitis B shot even though no blood test had been done.

The police made Jodi Ferris get up out of her hospital bed and escorted her to the entrance—they were expelling her from the hospital because she had not signed the “safety plan.” Scott met her at the entrance to the hospital. The police escorted them both off of the grounds of the hospital. Jodi was told that she would be allowed to return every three hours to nurse the baby through the night.

Jodi and Scott were forced to spend the night that she had given birth in their car in the parking lot of a nearby Wal-Mart. You read that right. They kicked this mother out of the hospital, and in order to be close enough to feed her child, she had to sleep in the car. To add insult to injury, Jodi was given access to Annie only sporadically and not every three hours. Baby Returned The next morning a judicial officer held a shelter care hearing. After hearing the evidence, the officer immediately returned custody of Annie to her parents.

reply to post by UnifiedSerenity


Cute story. Have you ever wondered how social workers end up pistol-whipped and unconscious outside their homes? Well, one theory is that they get checked for playing God with other people's lives and newborn children. Pretty extreme behavior. What exactly are they thinking? "Gee I guess I'll confiscate this couple's baby for my own personal amusement." No, no and no.

windword
reply to post by VoidHawk

 

Or, it could be that more and more women are single mothers, working mothers, busy, burnt out, distracted, etc., on their way home from work, pick up the kid from day care, stop at the local store for dinner supplies............

I dont think so.
About two years ago I went along to an open day on an organic farm. The first thing I noticed was the types of vehicle in the car park. There were all types ranging from rust bucket right up to top of the range merc. That indicated a broad range of people from all walks in life.
When I got on the farm I noticed two things that really stood out.
1. There were no overweight children.
2. The children were all extremely well behaved and pleasant.

I talked to quite a few people, and I earwigged a few conversations, and the topic of vaccines was everywhere, and I couldn't find one single parent who'd had their kids vaccinated!
When I think about what that lady said in the store ("they used to be more contented") and I think about how contented the organic/non-vaccinated kids were, I can only agree with her.

Written on the vaccine packaging.
May cause high pitch screaming.

What makes a child scream? Distress.
What causes high pitch screaming? Extreme distress.

What on earth do these vaccines do to cause extreme distress? Could it be a very severe headache? caused by chemicals that are interfering with the childs brain?

reply to post by Phage


Wow. With all the alleged abuse perpetrated against these young parents and their new born....all you can throw at it is a snide remark concerning something utterly irrelevant in the op.

It seems the hospital and it's government sanctioned pit bull attack was found to be wrong....return of the infant to it's parents, Thank God.

reply to post by UnifiedSerenity

It is against T&S to quote very much of an offsite article, and thus I kept with the sites rules.

That is why you cherry pick the important points, or at the very least the point you are trying to discuss... The first three paragraphs in you're external quote were unnecessary. You basically said the last was as well. I agree, people SHOULD read the article, but the OP should also quote the points that are to be discussed.

If, and that's a BIG if, this story is on the level, yes, I do believe the hospital acted inappropriately. I don't have the facts, and neither do any of you.

Realize that ALL the information you have is from one side at this point, a side that is asking for you to donate money. By all means, trust the lawyer suing the hospital. Lawyers never try to manipulate.

ok......enough about oxytocin...why can't anyone spell oxycotin the right way??