It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Saudis certainly fund Al Nusra Front, which is basically the de facto military extension of Al Qaeda in Syra. Al Nusra Front also happens to be fundamentalist... funny coincidence. But since they have the most money, they can hire the most fighters, and therefore indoctrinate the most fighters.
www.masud.co.uk...
The Wahhabi sect, which has not been around for more than two and a half centuries, has never been part of traditional Sunni Islam, which rejects it and which it rejects. Orthodox Sunnis, who make up the vast majority of Muslims, are neither Wahhabis nor terrorists, for the traditional law they follow forbids killing civilian non-combatants to make any kind of point, political or otherwise. Those who have travelled through North Africa, Turkey, Egypt, or the Levant know what traditional Muslims are like in their own lands. Travellers find them decent, helpful, and hospitable people, and feel safer in Muslim lands than in many places, such as Central America, for example, or for that matter, Central Park.
On the other hand, there will always be publicists who hate Muslims, and who for ideological or religious reasons want others to do so. Where there is an ill-will, there is a way. A fifth of humanity are Muslims, and if to err is human, we may reasonably expect Muslims to err also, and it is certainly possible to stir up hatred by publicizing bad examples. But if experience is any indication, the only people convinced by media pieces about the inherent fanaticism of Muslims will be those who don’t know any. Muslims have nothing to be ashamed of, and nothing to hide, and should simply tell people what their scholars and religious leaders have always said: first, that the Wahhabi sect has nothing to do with orthodox Islam, for its lack of tolerance is a perversion of traditional values; and second, that killing civilians is wrong and immoral.
And we Americans should take the necessary measures to get the ship of state back on a course that is credible, fair, and at bottom at least moral in our dealings with the other peoples of the world. For if our ideas of how to get along with other nations do not exceed the morality of action-thriller destruction movies, we may well get more action than we paid for.
www.nytimes.com...
Sunni-Shiite Cooperation Grows, Worrying U.S. Officials
By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN
Published: April 8, 2004
The British Foreign Office had previously begun to support Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of the Hejaz by seconding Lawrence of Arabia to him in 1915. The Saudi Ikhwan began to conflict with Emir Feisal also in 1917 just as his sons Abdullah and Faisal entered Damascus. The Treaty of Darin remained in effect until superseded by the Jeddah conference of 1927 and the Dammam conference of 1952 during both of which Ibn Saud extended his boundaries past the Anglo-Ottoman Blue Line. After Darin, he stockpiled the weapons and supplies with which the British provided him, including a 'tribute' of £5,000 per month.[15] After World War I, he received further support from the British, including a glut of surplus munitions. He launched his campaign against the Al Rashidi in 1920; by 1922 they had been all but destroyed.
Diisenchanted
reply to post by ZiggyMojo
Clearly the Wahhabi and the British were in bed together until the late twenties.
The British Foreign Office had previously begun to support Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of the Hejaz by seconding Lawrence of Arabia to him in 1915. The Saudi Ikhwan began to conflict with Emir Feisal also in 1917 just as his sons Abdullah and Faisal entered Damascus. The Treaty of Darin remained in effect until superseded by the Jeddah conference of 1927 and the Dammam conference of 1952 during both of which Ibn Saud extended his boundaries past the Anglo-Ottoman Blue Line. After Darin, he stockpiled the weapons and supplies with which the British provided him, including a 'tribute' of £5,000 per month.[15] After World War I, he received further support from the British, including a glut of surplus munitions. He launched his campaign against the Al Rashidi in 1920; by 1922 they had been all but destroyed.
Rise to power
In 1927 the Wahhabi and the Saudi government had a falling out. Wahhabi extremists revolt against Saudi regime because of it's dealings with the West. Rebellion is crushed. Extremists relocate in Egypt. Thoughts of Jihad against the West and America become central to the movement
So at that point you begin to see the rise of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt
There have been two constants in U.S.-Saudi relations for decades: oil and Gulf security, particularly the security of the Saudi royal family. Our two societies have had little in common, and yet despite deep differences, we have had a “special relationship” with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for over sixty years, really since the early 1930s, though it was not described as a special relationship until after WWII. The two countries have had a compact based on Saudi oil in return for a U.S. security umbrella over the kingdom to protect it from all foreign foes. This is a relationship very definitely anchored in state interests, not common ideologies or political or social systems, which remain at extreme odds with each other.
There is practically no civil society in Saudi Arabia. The country is run by the al-Saud royal family in partnership with a highly conservative religious establishment espousing a fundamentalist theology known as Wahhabism. The alliance goes back to the mid-eighteenth century.
For much of its history most of the region has been controlled by a patchwork of tribal rulers. The Al Saud (the Saudi royal family), were originally minor tribal rulers in Nejd in central Arabia. From the mid-18th century, imbued with the religious zeal of the Wahabbi Islamic movement, they became aggressively expansionist. Over the following 150 years the extent of the Al Saud territory fluctuated. However, between 1902 and 1927, the Al Saud leader, Abdul Aziz, carried out a series of wars of conquest which resulted in his creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932.
Although Saudi Arabia and the United States obviously did not share any borders, the kingdom's relationship with Washington was the cornerstone of its foreign policy as well as its regional security policy. The special relationship with the United States actually dated to World War II. By the early 1940s, the extent of Saudi oil resources had become known, and the United States petroleum companies that held the concession to develop the oil fields were urging Washington to assume more responsibility for security and political stability in the region. Consequently, in 1943 the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt declared that the defense of Saudi Arabia was a vital interest to the United States and dispatched the first United States military mission to the kingdom. In addition to providing training for the Saudi army, the United States Army Corps of Engineers constructed the airfield at Dhahran and other facilities. In early 1945, Abd al Aziz and Roosevelt cemented the nascent alliance in a meeting aboard a United States warship in the Suez Canal. Subsequently, Saud, Faisal, Khalid, and Fahd continued their father's precedent of meeting with United States presidents.
reply to post by ZiggyMojo
The ideas presented in my OP are gaining more support or at least a sturdier background for Saudi Arabia being our biggest problem.
Diisenchanted
reply to post by ZiggyMojo
The ideas presented in my OP are gaining more support or at least a sturdier background for Saudi Arabia being our biggest problem.
Lets take a step back for a moment.
When you look at the troubles in the middle east it comes down to the divisions between Shiites and Sunni's. Here is a map that shows which part of the middle east is controlled by which sect.
World Map - Muslim Distribution
From the map you can see that the dark green area is controlled by the Shiites and the light green area's are controlled by the Sunni's.
This is where it starts to get really ugly. If you take a closer look at the map you will notice that the major Shiite controlled areas consist of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey, Yemen with some small pockets in Pakistan and Oman.
When compared with the recent wars the US has involved itself in you begin to see the correlation. The US seems to have it out for the Shiites. Not only have we went to war with Iraq and Afghanistan we have carried out countless drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.
Now who is it that Obama seems to have it out for now? The answer is obvious Iran and Syria.
A simple Google search will show the ties between the Saudi's and the US government in gulf war 1, gulf war 2 , and the war in Afghanistan.
We seem to be doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia in all of our recent wars.
Mosque Funding?
It's been estimated that as many as 80 percent of American mosques have received funds from Saudi Arabia, where the official state religion is radical Wahhabi Islam
Saudi Arabia has been the catalyst for our involvement, and one of the biggest backers of our intervention.. and you can see why.. Just as you said, we've been doing the bidding for them in all of the recent wars there.
Also, as you've mentioned.. It is rather alarming to see our involvement and the UK's involvement since Saudi Arabia's inception. It's as if it is all a part of a grand scheme.. A century or perhaps longer scheme that has benefited western civilization with oil and profit and the Saudi's with power and profit. It's a win-win situation for all parties economically.
I think we're connecting some pretty big dots here..
www.terrorism-illuminati.com...
D. Mustafa Turan wrote, in The Donmeh Jews, that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was a descendant of a family of Donmeh Jews from Turkey. The Donmeh were descendants of followers of the infamous false-messiah of Judaism, Shabbetai Zevi, who shocked the Jewish world in 1666 by converting to Islam. Viewing it as a sacred mystery, Zevi's followers imitated his conversion to Islam, though secretly keeping to their Kabbalistic doctrines. In Europe, the Shabbeteans were eventually led a century later by Jacob Frank, claiming to be a reincarnation of Zevi. And, according to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, to them belonged the Rothschilds who had a hand in the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Donmeh community of Turkey were concentrated in the city of Salonika, which became a hotbed of Masonic activity, and from which the Young Turk movement evolved, which aided in the collapse of the Muslim empire of the Ottoman Turks. There is evidence that Ataturk himself, the founder of the modern Turkish state, was of Donmeh origin as well.
Diisenchanted
reply to post by frazzle
I was actually just getting ready to post that.
lol
Star for you.
Edit to add: So now we seem to have Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UK and America in bed together. Makes for an ugly orgy!edit on 10-9-2013 by Diisenchanted because: (no reason given)
frazzle
reply to post by ZiggyMojo
Saudi Arabia has been the catalyst for our involvement, and one of the biggest backers of our intervention.. and you can see why.. Just as you said, we've been doing the bidding for them in all of the recent wars there.
Also, as you've mentioned.. It is rather alarming to see our involvement and the UK's involvement since Saudi Arabia's inception. It's as if it is all a part of a grand scheme.. A century or perhaps longer scheme that has benefited western civilization with oil and profit and the Saudi's with power and profit. It's a win-win situation for all parties economically.
I think we're connecting some pretty big dots here..
Please allow me to throw another dot at you ...
www.terrorism-illuminati.com...
D. Mustafa Turan wrote, in The Donmeh Jews, that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was a descendant of a family of Donmeh Jews from Turkey. The Donmeh were descendants of followers of the infamous false-messiah of Judaism, Shabbetai Zevi, who shocked the Jewish world in 1666 by converting to Islam. Viewing it as a sacred mystery, Zevi's followers imitated his conversion to Islam, though secretly keeping to their Kabbalistic doctrines. In Europe, the Shabbeteans were eventually led a century later by Jacob Frank, claiming to be a reincarnation of Zevi. And, according to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, to them belonged the Rothschilds who had a hand in the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Donmeh community of Turkey were concentrated in the city of Salonika, which became a hotbed of Masonic activity, and from which the Young Turk movement evolved, which aided in the collapse of the Muslim empire of the Ottoman Turks. There is evidence that Ataturk himself, the founder of the modern Turkish state, was of Donmeh origin as well.
I highly recommend reading this entire report.