It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

For the first time : Assad say to media *No! i dont kill my own people!

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:14 AM
link   
rt.com/news/syria-crisis-live-updates-047/


Sunday, September 8 14:58 GMT: Syrian President Assad has talked to the American media for the first time in two years. CBS’ Charlie Rose spoke to the President; however, the full interview will only be available on Monday on the Face the Nation TV-show. Syrian president Bashar al-Assad denied to CBS being behind chemical attack.



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Have we a reason to believe him?

Have we reasons not to?

Does it really matter at this point?

This is just so gross all the way around I just wish they’d get on with whatever’s going to happen and stop the freakin’ merry-go-round.

God help us all.

peace



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:30 AM
link   
reply to post by silo13
 


just believe what you feel Mr.Silo
i cant guarante anything..



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by cheesy
 

It's Ms Silo - but thank you.


My point - there's just soooo much info we're being bombarded with - it's so hard to even catch a clue of the truth.
I appreciate your willingness to cover all sides - hats off to that.

Problem is - Assad is still the leader - thus accountable. Now, does that mean the Western World should be in there killing more people because he’s (ultimately) responsible for killing people?

No.

peace



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:41 AM
link   
It seems that the only ones that know for sure what happened are the ones who did it. It would be nice to have one of them come forth and tell the world....but they probably would not be believed by the opposing side anyway. It seems that the discounting of evidence that does not reinforce our beliefs is very evident in society today. It is not new, this has been going on for thousands of years.

I would have to say the motive for using chemical weapons is greater by the rebels. They knew the USA had a line drawn and Assad was not supposed to cross it. That does not mean that the weapons were not deployed by the government though, only that the motive to pin it on Assad is stronger than any motive that Assad would have.

I cannot say who deployed the weapons, the evidence clearly shows that they were used though by someone. They should destroy all of these chemical weapons that Chemists created. This shows us how science has been abused by those who desire power.



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 10:44 AM
link   
reply to post by silo13
 


forgive me Ms Silo..
i agree with you..if they want assad take him only not the rest of the country..use best troops like navy seal or fbi or speciel force for kidnap assad secretly..dont make more poeple sufer..



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:01 AM
link   
I wondered last night as I was going to bed if our desire/need for freedom and representative government across the world is really all that different from communism's need/desire for oppression and strict control of resources? Could it be that our perspective on freedom causes us to fund dissent or to turn a blind eye to rebels in countries that do not have the same kind of freedoms we have? Could we be making the world more filled with war just because we feel all countries should share the same kind of freedoms?

I'm not saying it's bad for us to want other countries to have the same freedoms we have and to also have representative governments, but maybe it's better if we had a more hands off attitude? The way I see it, all countries are self-interested and have certain ideals they shoot for and work to cause strife in other countries that do not have the same ideals. This causes conflict and war.

We're fighting for freedom and will die just like a radical will die for Allah.

Our passion is our pain. Our dreams are our nightmares.

Of all the ideals in the world I'd have to say the one of representative government and freedom is probably the most virtuous. However, should that mean I should fund/support dissent and rebellion in countries that have oppression and collectivism or tyranny? What if it's human nature for us to be different? What if it's human nature for there to be capitalism and socialism and communism all on one planet?

I get the feeling the only way we'll have peace is if we completely destroy opposing ideals or reduce them to minority status so that all of earth is like one country or one nation.
edit on 8-9-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:04 AM
link   
It's not Syria or Assad that is wanted. It's Iran's intervention that is wanted so we can then turn our full attention to them with less backlash from the American people.

The Middle East is just a chess game folks. Take out the Rooks and Knights before you move in for the Kings and Queens.



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse


I cannot say who deployed the weapons, the evidence clearly shows that they were used though by someone. They should destroy all of these chemical weapons that Chemists created. This shows us how science has been abused by those who desire power.



who supplied the sarin gas:
A) the gas was made in Syria by the Syrian goovernment
B) the gas was covertly supplied to al Nusra by Saudi & Quatar sources
C) roumors mount that the CIA gave the rebels the gas, likely from Chechnya or Bosnia captured arms


as for destroying existing cache's og chemical weapons:
A) the UN inspectors were a mess over in the Iraq inspections of WMDs
B) if sanctions & UN inspectors are imposed... the bombing & missile attacks by the USA need called off
C) Is Syria a signee of the chemical weapons accords



0bama is adamant on both punishing and then decimating the Syrian ability to use chemical weapons in future


it seems like an impass to me... with a launch date of either 10 or 11 September... ergo the un-anticipated 0bama pause for Congress to vote...i guess for 0bama to see if the Sadow Government Banker cartel along with the remaning neocons can muster a Yes vote to challenge the 0bama Muslim Brotherhood cadre of executive branch leadership vying for the visible reigns of power of the Congress vote & the command of the USA geopolitical policy
edit on 8-9-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Well if he really did say "No, I don't kill my own people"....then he's kicked off with a lie straight away, because regardless of whether he was behind the CW attack...Assad most certainly does kill his own people!



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Argyll
 


Ain't that the truth!

He has killed thousands of his own people in the last year.



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:14 AM
link   
If the title as what it said is true, then i won't believe whatever Assad says anymore. If he does not kill his own people, so who killed those protesters on 2011?
Seems people here easily forgot who started the killing first.

Those who blindly supports Assad should take a look at this timelime.
Syria Arab Spring Timeline
edit on 8-9-2013 by marhaba because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by silo13
Have we a reason to believe him?

Have we reasons not to?

Does it really matter at this point?

This is just so gross all the way around I just wish they’d get on with whatever’s going to happen and stop the freakin’ merry-go-round.

God help us all.

peace


It doesn't matter because the reason his regime is going to be dismantled and replaced by Sunni muslim crazies has nothing to do with chemical weapons and never did.

Personally i do believe him. Nothing i've read about the man suggests he's an imbecile or has a death wish. He's undoubtedly ruthless but thats neither here nor there. He'd have to be a moron to do the one thing that the superpower warned him not to do with UN monitors ringing his doorbell.

On the other side you have a group of morally bankrupt religious nuts on the losing side of a conflict.

Meanwhile the push is on to get the deed done before the UN reports.

This script is already written and the attack has all but started, thats why McCain has that big idiot smirk on his face. He knows all this senate/congress stuff is just theatre. They are going in anyway to fulfil their contract to the Saudis and Qatar.

I'll be pleased if i'm wrong but I don't think so.



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by cheesy
 


Remember this?




posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Argyll
Well if he really did say "No, I don't kill my own people"....then he's kicked off with a lie straight away, because regardless of whether he was behind the CW attack...Assad most certainly does kill his own people!

UN dont have a proof..
Usa dont have a proof..
Russia ready for war because UN dont have a proof..
all the country say no to usa millitary intervention see the way russia see..
Assad say no..
Saudi arabia give money and training rabel to jihat to syria, usa suport, turkey too, far before chemical attack incident,, what they need??
feel it sense it..even your goverment spy on you because they dont believe you!



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Unfortunately for Syrians, the Assad clan has been merrily killing their countrymen for decades, whether through the casual repression and brutality of a police state, or significant incidences, such as the 1982 Hama massacre, which saw between 10,000 and 50,000 Syrians perish.

Tragically, the current civil war is a reminder that dictators can lose control and that different flavours of Islam hate each other.

Regards



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by Argyll
 


Ain't that the truth!

He has killed thousands of his own people in the last year.

remember the one who call for tirany on syria after chemical attack and want to strike syria is one of the very expert in chemical weapon use to his enemy..
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread969162/pg1



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Argyll
Well if he really did say "No, I don't kill my own people"....then he's kicked off with a lie straight away, because regardless of whether he was behind the CW attack...Assad most certainly does kill his own people!


But you're wrong, Assad gets others to kill his own people. On top of that, who are Assads people, he looks pretty white to me
He also has either Vulcan or elf shaped ears

It is a matter of perspective, he may not be lying technically.

edit on 8-9-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by windword
reply to post by cheesy
 


Remember this?



remember Iraq. war? where the hell WMD they talking about? or just 1 trillion jackpot from the resource inside iraq land?



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by paraphi
Unfortunately for Syrians, the Assad clan has been merrily killing their countrymen for decades, whether through the casual repression and brutality of a police state, or significant incidences, such as the 1982 Hama massacre, which saw between 10,000 and 50,000 Syrians perish.

Tragically, the current civil war is a reminder that dictators can lose control and that different flavours of Islam hate each other.

Regards

no! that even not syrian..
www.aina.org/news/20130120160624.htm




top topics



 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join