It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


New ATS is a huge memory hog.

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:18 PM
A little over an hour ago I had the ATS fire hose page open, along with 3 other ATS tabs. My browser was using 800,000+ K memory.

I refreshed the fire hose page to see what was new since I last looked and I noticed the new style was implemented and I had to log in again.

After logging in I went and refreshed the other 3 tabs I had open so they would assume the new theme and my browser's CPU usage is now at 3,000,000 million+ K!

I already know that once it gets to around 4 million my browser will shut down.

Anyone else having this issue?

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:21 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

I'm running between 206 MB and 210 MB with ATS, Chat, and one other window (2 tabs) open. If I close ATS and chat, it only drops to about 204 MB.

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:21 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

Just had my browser crash when visiting 'hot topics' Not sure why it did this but could be related. Never done that before.
Trying FF as there were other issues with Opera, probably local issues though as other Opera users didnt have them.
edit on 5-9-2013 by greavsie1971 because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:22 PM
reply to post by greavsie1971

I've seen a few crashes while testing the new site. It's not the most unstable thing, but I get two to three crashes a day maybe.

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:24 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

Firefox 282k
Plugin container 206k
CPU usage at 33%

3 ATS tabs and 1 Netflix tab running

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:29 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

You likely have a browser add-on causing a problem for you, or you've got a virus/malware causing your issue. 3-million K is roughly 3 gigs of memory and that's alot. I've never even seen a browser come close to using that much memory.

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:31 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

Using Chrome, each tab is consuming 52,000k. Chrome itself is consuming 500,000k and I have 10 ATS tabs open, GTA, Utorrent, skype, and aion and im running fine.

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:31 PM
reply to post by ShadowLink

Yeah boss, that's pretty much straight up impossible.

I've been testing the site for months now and I've never had any slow downs or crashes or anything of that matter, that wasn't explained by either an add one, or a lack of updates to either services like flash, or video card drivers.


posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:32 PM
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

Nah... nope, no way....

Admit to the real reason you've posted this.... bet ya won't.

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 06:34 PM
Folks, we've been tossing out sneak-peaks for months, have been opening this up to members for about a couple months, and have had an open member beta test for almost a full week.

Everyone got a U2U urging them to test the new site and provide commentary in this thread:
Open Member Testing: ATS.5/3 Final Release Candidate
If you didn't participate in an unprecedented open test and request for feedback, why are you doing so after launch?

Please stop starting new threads and use this one thread for your comments.

And for the purpose of communicating, yet again, the rationale behind the redesign, here is what was posted in the open test thread...

By now everyone should have received a private message with the username/password that enables access to the Final Release Candidate version of the new ATS.5/3.

This is the fourth round of user testing (first being staff-only, second being invited beta-testers, and third being an open-beta test to all members) and is intended to accomplish the following:

1) final testing of the site UX (user experience) on a wider variety of user scenarios

2) final refinement of of the color scheme of the two UI (user interface) options

3) establish an understanding of the new interface/structure for a less jarring cut-over

4) begin the offered opportunity for a member collaboration on new smilies

This open test is not intended as an opportunity to offer significant alterations to the UI/UX in any way. Months of work, preceded by months of research, and that preceded by months of analysis of existing "upgrades" to so-called discussion board frameworks (XenForo being the best of a lackluster bunch).

The Primary Goal

What you are testing is not "change for the sake of change." Two massively important factors have been the driving force behind such a significant re-think of what a discussion board platform should be.

1) While the number of in-bound new users (roughly 85% of all daily traffic) has remained relatively flat, the user-engagement (content/thread pages viewed) has been falling off for months.

2) Across the Internet, nearly all discussion boards are experiencing a very similar phenomena. The decline in engagement is seen everywhere, even in large long-established video game forums.

The reason, is relatively simple: the audience has changed. The percentage of people comfortable with the rigid/tight discussion board format is decreasing, while the percentage of people accustomed to the more open sensibilities of contemporary flat design is increasing. It's a clearly quantified (and has been) fact of life for online operators.

Our mandate at, for more than ten years, has been to create and maintain a venue that showcases the quality content created by our members. A big part of that mandate has been consistent attention to search engine optimization. Another big part has been the delicate balance of advertising to provide the revenue needed to support big traffic, our own advertising, and growth. But the biggest part of that balance has always been finding ways to push the boundaries of a discussion board platform so that new users have the best possible chance to discover your content.

Right now, discovery is falling. Action is needed.

So every decision from font-size to color to mobile responsiveness has been from the vantage point of "what best highlights the content." The content is first. The content is second. And the content is third.

I'm not saying your input isn't important

That's why this is the third time we've opened the development site up to members. But if we didn't place a high priority on ensuring your content is both discovered and lingered-over, all we'd be doing is talking amongst ourselves and no one would have encountered the long-list of content that you created, that became important on thousands of other websites and hundreds of news sources.

This IS for you.

this thread is closed.

top topics


log in