It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Commenting on the research, Prof Joann Fletcher from the department of archaeology at the University of York, said: "This is highly significant work, which pulls the beginnings of Egypt's dynastic history into much sharper focus - it is tremendously valuable to have such a precise timeline for Egypt's first rulers.
Originally posted by Harte
reply to post by Hanslune
You fabricated this, Hans. It's obvious because everyone knows that Egyptologists and Archaeologists in general are dead-set opposed to any new ideas taking hold in their field.
They all conspire to keep the status quo and to prevent the general public from knowing any of the REAL truths about the past.
Because this fact is undeniable, there is no way any mainstream archaeologist has established a different timeline!
Harte
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Hanslune
Hans, could you tell us a bit more about what this means? A readjustment of about 650 years is profound, yet it seems relatively small compared to the great age of Egyptian civilisation. What does it mean, for instance, in terms of how the Egyptians related to other cultures extant in the world at the time? Are there any implications for international trade and other forms of intercourse? Cultural exchange? Inventions?
Originally posted by Spider879
Hmm how did I missed this thread, and how do the new dating impact the finds at cemetery L in Qustul, known as Ta-Seti often touted as the first state on the Nile.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Spider879
Hmm how did I missed this thread, and how do the new dating impact the finds at cemetery L in Qustul, known as Ta-Seti often touted as the first state on the Nile.
Sorry cannot answer that as it is outside my area of knowledge
Originally posted by Spider879
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Spider879
Hmm how did I missed this thread, and how do the new dating impact the finds at cemetery L in Qustul, known as Ta-Seti often touted as the first state on the Nile.
Sorry cannot answer that as it is outside my area of knowledge
Hmm bummer.. because the demise of Ta-Seti the state coincides with the rise of the 1st dyn. under Aha. hope they can clean up the dates more as it would affect others sites just outside the borders of traditional Kmt.edit on 6-9-2013 by Spider879 because: (no reason given)