It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Even the Israeli newspaper, the Haaretz, doesnt believe that Assad was behind the attack.

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 26 2013 @ 02:20 PM
Jihadists, not Assad, apparently behind reported chemical attack in Syria.

Was the first use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war carried out by rebel forces fighting against the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad?

It would seem that even the Haaretz is questioning the attack.

The Haaretz, like any other media outlet has its biases and agendas, but I have also found that it can be very neutral and fair.

I forgot my password so if someone can login and give us a summary or quote some text, that would be nice.

Interesting thing is that this article was from March 24th of this year. Was there another chemical weapon attack that was less publicized?

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 11:27 AM
reply to post by gladtobehere

They were probably going to try and blame it on Assad but there was too much evidence it was the rebels. This is the reason western media have not reported said attack. It just does not suit their agenda.
edit on 3-9-2013 by maythetruthbeknown because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 12:44 PM
Rush Limbaugh just discussed Joseph Bedanski's (Israeli Military Scholar) six page article discussing it was not Assad.
See later today it will be up.
The repercussions for Obama are going to be huge - Rush Limbaugh

new topics

log in