Even the Israeli newspaper, the Haaretz, doesnt believe that Assad was behind the attack.

Jihadists, not Assad, apparently behind reported chemical attack in Syria.

Was the first use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war carried out by rebel forces fighting against the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad?

It would seem that even the Haaretz is questioning the attack.

The Haaretz, like any other media outlet has its biases and agendas, but I have also found that it can be very neutral and fair.

I forgot my password so if someone can login and give us a summary or quote some text, that would be nice.

Interesting thing is that this article was from March 24th of this year. Was there another chemical weapon attack that was less publicized?

reply to post by gladtobehere


They were probably going to try and blame it on Assad but there was too much evidence it was the rebels. This is the reason western media have not reported said attack. It just does not suit their agenda.

Rush Limbaugh just discussed Joseph Bedanski's (Israeli Military Scholar) six page article discussing it was not Assad.
See rushlimbaugh.com later today it will be up.
The repercussions for Obama are going to be huge - Rush Limbaugh