It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A top Iranian military chief warned on Sunday that the U.S. will face “harsh consequences” if it intervenes in Syria over claims of chemical attacks, reported Agence France Presse citing a Fars new agency report.
“If the United States crosses this red line, there will be harsh consequences for the White House,” armed forces deputy chief of staff Massoud Jazayeri was quoted as saying.
Originally posted by DaRAGE
I swear I thought I heard Russia saying that if the US gets involved in Syria there will be war or something like that ages ago when this whole conflict started...
This guy is a wind bag! I would have thought that the harsh consequences would ultimately be for Iran.
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
Iranian military chief warns against U.S. crossing Syria 'red line'
english.alarab iya.net
(visit the link for the full news article)
A top Iranian military chief warned on Sunday that the U.S. will face “harsh consequences” if it intervenes in Syria over claims of chemical attacks, reported Agence France Presse citing a Fars new agency report.
“If the United States crosses this red line, there will be harsh consequences for the White House,” armed forces deputy chief of staff Massoud Jazayeri was quoted as saying.
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
Now with them saying this --
Syria agreed to let the United Nations inspect the site of a suspected chemical weapons attack from Monday but a U.S. official said any such offer would be "too late to be credible" and there was little doubt the government was to blame.
"At this juncture, any belated decision by the regime to grant access to the U.N. team would be considered too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime's persistent shelling and other international actions over the last five days," the official said
www.reuters.com...
-------------------------
At this point, it is sounding more and more like.. "prepare for what is coming."
Israel has the US, the UK, and France, and maybe Australia and Canada, to form an "International Coalition" that they will claim does not make it "unilateral".
" Russia warned the United States on Sunday against repeating past mistakes, saying that any unilateral military action in Syria would undermine efforts for peace and have a devastating impact on the security situation in the Middle East. "
Originally posted by Dianec
reply to post by justwokeup
I am not seeing why they think its too late other than other weapons are making it more difficult to sift through. Maybe the government did this but it seems like the media is being used to form public opinion again. If you go into a murder scene a month after it happened you can still gather evidence. If someone broke into my car and I didn't report it for 2 weeks a really good detective could probably get pretty close to nailing down a likely suspect. Its not too late unless they can spell out what it is about the scene that makes it too late. I am not taking their word for anything and generalities don't work.
It seems as if intervention has been in the making for a long time. Threats to not cross a red line, taking sides, sticking our noses in with comments at every turn. Writing letters is all good but it appears our government is going to find a way to justify an intervention in spite of this. Especially if the UN is cheering us on.
Originally posted by amkia
Gee..
I am not sure why they doing this, considering this kind of threat and statements will open the windows of opportunities for Israel to attack the American fleet (like they did on USS liberty) and blame it later on Iran.