It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The programme, Ancient Voices, shows that the dimensions of prehistoric skulls found in Brazil match those of the aboriginal peoples of Australia and Melanesia. Other evidence suggests that these first Americans were later massacred by invaders from Asia.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by Spider879
Hey spider,
Am at work so didn't get a chance yet to watch vid, but will after work.
What I'd like to add is that what has been characterized as austrailian or African morphology by some writers when speaking paleoindians, is not entirely correct, it is archaic morphology, as typified by the Santa lago skulls, Luiza, and the pericue of Baja and most surprising to me the early yokuts of ca.
I have a paper describing the "tranquillity"burials and compares them with other paleo Indian skulls.
I'll try to track that link down, I also have it in pdf.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by Spider879
Here you go spider
www.sil.si.edu...
I'll try to find another paper detailing a skeletal morphology transition of paleo Indians in the great basin, from burials at spirit cave and another un- named site in Nevada.
The oldest layers have people whose skeletal morphology is termed caucasoidal, but transitions to a type more like the present day paiute. The most interesting thing is that they remain culturally consistent, ie theyafr the same baskets, tools and sandals.
See if you can find the homo erectus reference in the paper.
edit on 16-8-2013 by punkinworks10 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Noinden
reply to post by Spider879
My main comment is that skull dimensions are a poor way to determine such things. Genetics are much better
Originally posted by coredrill
You could look up the Pedra Furada Archaeological sites, which indicates human occupation in the Americas even before the influx of humans across the Bering bridge.
The evidences mostly point that the Pedra Furada Inhabitants came to the Americas from Australasia (i.e the forefathers of the Australasian aborigines]
Perhaps they would have clashes with cultures which had arrived at the continent sailing along the coast, perhaps the Ainu?
could be a possibility.
Prehistoric Human Remains from Jalisco, Mexico
Joel D. Irish, Stanley D. Davis, John (Jack) E. Lobdell, and Frederico A. Sol'97rzano
The likelihood of a late-Pleistocene human presence in Jalisco, Mexico, is supported by culturally modified faunal bones, diagnostic lithics, and mineralized human bones; this report concerns the latter, which were analyzed by Irish, using standard osteol
ogical procedures (Bass 1981; Brothwell 1981; Ortner and Putschar 1985; Shipman et al. 1986; Ubelaker 1989; White 1991). All materials were recovered 50 km southeast of Guadalajara, in the Lake Chapala and Zacoalco Playa basins.
The human remains are thought to be of late-Pleistocene age based on faunal correlation. Many have been in Sol'97rzano
s possession for some time; others were recently collected. Like associated fauna, all are mineralized, dark in color, and fragmentary. We have a focus on their origins and will work to establish exact field proveniences in May 2000.
The Chapala bones (n = 10) have a MNI of three, based on two left superciliary arches (brow ridges) and a deciduous incisor. The super border of each brow is blunt, implying the sex was
male in both cases. However, size variations of other fragments suggest males and females are represented. The deciduous incisor is from a three-year-old; the rest represent young adults.
One Chapala superciliary arch deserves specific mention due to its large size. Studies by Sol'97rzano show the bone resembles that in archaic Homo sapiens at Arago, France. In an unpublished 1990 report, Texas A&M osteologists suggest the brow's thickness and robustness are comparable to those of KNM-ER 3733 (African Hom
o erectus). Our measurements show the central torus thickness is 13.3, compared with 8.5 mm for KNM-ER 3733; the lateral torus thickness is 11.5 versus 9.0 mm (Rightmire 1998). Thus for the sake of comparison, the brow is more like that of Zhoukoudian Skull XI (Asian Homo erectus), with a central torus thickness of 13.2 +/- mm; lateral torus thickness was not measured (Rightmire 1998). Modern brows are too diminutive to allow these measurements. The brow also shows pneumatization (air pockets) along its length.
However, to reiterate the findings of the Texas A&M workers, these comparisons do not imply that pre-Homo sapiens were in the Americas.
No phylogenetic or age implications are intended. Instead, the comparisons demonstrate the size relative to most
New World specimens, although brows on the Lagoa Santa skull (Bryan 1978) and on recent Tierra del Fuego and Patagonia crania (Lahr 1995; C.L. Brace pers. comm. 1998) appear comparable.