Those AGAINST GMO - VS - Those For

Considering the incredible level of starvation and death worldwide that would be caused by returning to old farming methods, I'm for any GMO product deemed safe by peer reviewed studies. I reject completely studies by radicals and less than reputable science with an agenda or based on unfounded paranoia. Things such as GMO's are needed to feed the world.

The needless starvation of perhaps tens of millions from food shortages pretty well dictates that.

I am for labeling to let people decide for themselves.

I do have issues with not enough competition and how certain companies are behaving.

I also have issues with those who want to force their wishes on everyone else.

This is way to complex to narrow down to a for or against vote.

From the Wikipedia -

A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. Organisms that have been genetically modified include micro-organisms such as bacteria and yeast, insects, plants, fish, and mammals. GMOs are the source of genetically modified foods, and are also widely used in scientific research and to produce goods other than food. The term GMO is very close to the technical legal term, 'living modified organism' defined in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which regulates international trade in living GMOs (specifically, "any living organism that possesses a novel combination of genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology").....

GM crops have made it possible to produce many times the yield on the same finite amount of available arable land. The world looses that, the poorest of the poor suffer greatly. Prices skyrocket, while yeilds fall. People would suffer most in the poorest countries.

It is in no way as simple as for or against. It's absurd to even suggest it is that simple.