Hot Cha Cha Cha... Obama Admits Consulting With Democratic Socialist Marxist On Immigration Reform

Those first four words in the title of my thread is what came out of my mouth when I realized just what I have here. Yes! Who knows, maybe this isn't big news to you, but me likes this a lot!

Lord knows how old or new this LIve Leak is. But here is a LIveLeak video of Obama mentioning that he consulted with Eliseo Medina, a well known Marxist on immigration reform.

I think this is good stuff, but if I am wrong, well at least I tried.

Before immigration debates took place in Washington I talked to Eliseo Medina and SEIU members.
etc...
We worked together over these last few years... And I am proud of what we have done.

Watch the LIve leak video from the beginning to hear the remark by Obama that he consulted with Medina about immigration reform. Once you hear this you don't need to listen anymore. The second half of the video where Eliseo Medina talks, is also on Youtube, and is listed below this link..

Obama Admits To Consulting Top Socialist on Immigration - Two Videos Joined Together

In a speech to the far left America's Future Now! conference in Washington, DC on June 2, 2009, Eliseo Medina revealed the real reason SEIU, Democratic Socialists of America and Barack Obama all want amnesty for illegal aliens and oppose all moves to increase security on the Mexican border - 8 million new Democratic voters and the chance to create "a governing coalition for the long term".

Eliseo Medina speaks:

One of the US’ top “immigrant’s rights” activists, labor leader and Democratic Socialists of America Marxist, Eliseo Medina, admits that illegal immigrant amnesty has nothing to do with compassion or economics – it’s all about permanent political power for the left.

Medina sees illegal immigrant amnesty and voting rights as the beginnings of a “governing coalition for the long term.”

Socialism Through Immigration: Leading Marxist Immigration Activist Admits it’s All About the Votes!

reply to post by elouina


They are underestimating the democrats power..Mr. President you no longer have to worry about getting immigration past to ensure the democrats will win for the next 100 years...the younger generation has spoken and they like democrats...they don't know why, I guess they think it's cool...

Talk about stacking the deck but most on here knew that immigration was just to buy votes....the only difference is the democrats will have a harder time saying it was the right thing to do because they care about our neighbors....

"Hot cha cha cha" cracked me up, thanks for that...

This seemed obvious to me from the second the words "citizenship" and "11 million undocumented" appeared in the same sentences a while back. Still it's good to see the proof behind those suspicions come to light.

Nice catch!

Anyone who didn't think immigration/Amnesty wasn't about votes was not living in reality.

True Fact,

It has never been about anything BUT votes.

Which is what the whole deal is about, 'identity politics' to get and maintain political power,

The ends justify the means garbage.

Maybe if Obama would stop alienating half of the legal residents in this country he, and his party wouldn't have to 'make' other people from other countries who don't know how full of crap they are, citizens

Hmm. Why doesn't it surprise me to find the words 'Obama' and 'Marxist' in the same sentence?

So, the Director-General of the globalist agenda consults a marxist on immigration issues.....

At least it's affirmation for those of us who already know what's what.

reply to post by neo96


Well, you know this and I know this, but sometimes people need a little more than common sense. But I think the bigger part of this thread is Obama admitting that he got together with a Marxist over immigration reform. Isn't this like colluding with the enemy? You know everything our constitution stands against?

Did I say hot cha cha cha? Oh yeah, I did...

The democratic Socialists Of America presents... Barack Obama.

The whole thing is misleading, seeing as how Obama has been 99% Corporatist since elected.
Most policy decisions have not had anything to do with socialism (not saying all, but mostly), and nothing he does has been Marxist.

This nonsense is as bad as J Edgar Hoover.

There's a 1000 reasons not to like what Obama does, but the far right always mucks it up, because the point is to get you all thinking in a paradigm that doesn't actually exist.

reply to post by elouina

Speakers at the Democratic Socialists Of America event in 1996 (before he was even a senator) that I showed up above.....

William Julius Wilson = Marxist
Toni Preckwinkle = Marxist
Joseph Schwartz = radical Marxist
Michael Dawson = Marxist
Barack Obama =??? I say if the shoe fits, wear it!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of Obama's topics at the meeting?

‘The state government “can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts.””

Barack Obama Pushed ‘Redistribution’ at Historic Socialists Meeting in 1996

reply to post by pirhanna

seeing as how Obama has been 99% Corporatist since elected.

And so he is.

Corporatists and Marxists are in bed together over mass immigration.

They both want the same thing (albeit for different reasons).

reply to post by pirhanna


That's my confusion as well. Obama is really nothing but a successful Teleprompter reader. No way is he in charge of anything because he just doesn't care about anything except being a rockstar and playing golf. So, he was apparently "chosen" by someone. But, which one?

On one hand you have the socialists making inroads because of his white house staff and on the other hand you have the corporate lobbyists and contractors reaping millions because of our government sellout.

Is there an aim to all this or is it just a ball of confusion? Am I just not understanding?

eta- cjcrawley - please expand on that for my dumb as..

reply to post by elouina


Obama caucusing with Marxists !!!

Who woulda guessed

Of COURSE he does.

He was indoctrinated by one of the best in the business, Frank Marshal Davis.

He was further nurtured by others like Bill Ayers and wife Bernardine Dohrn and God only knows who else.

He is surrounded by many of the same bunch.

reply to post by CJCrawley

Originally posted by CJCrawley
reply to post by pirhanna

 

seeing as how Obama has been 99% Corporatist since elected.

And so he is.

Corporatists and Marxists are in bed together over mass immigration.

They both want the same thing (albeit for different reasons).

........ And for many 'in common' reasons and agendas.

The perfect mix of portland cement and sand gives you Grampaw Karl's secret formula for banking.

reply to post by xuenchen


And he was a card carrying member of the "new party" (Dem Socialists of America)

Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)."

Wayback Machine LInk to scrubbed New Party info

Plus...

New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.

Populist.com Editorial

And...

Secondly, the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration. The lone loser was Willie Delgado, in the 3rd Illinois House District. Although Delgado received 45% of the vote, he lost by only 800 votes. Delgado commented that it was due to the NP volunteers that he carried the 32nd Ward. Delgado emphasized that he will remain a visible community activist in Humbolt Park. He will conduct four Immigration workshops and encouraged NP activists to get involved.

New Party Update - Chicago DSA

Obama campaigning openly for socialist Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont

Since I am on a roll....




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By September 1993 Obama was one of 17 people listed as a signatory on all Progressive Chicago letters – as shown by the second page of this September 22 Progressive Chicago letter to Joe Gardner.

New Proof: Obama member of the Radial Leftist New Party

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

reply to post by xuenchen


Once again something we know all too well. But there are soo many here that will discount this to no end. I figured all this proof here has to mean something.

Plus I really think immigration reform needs examined again, while considering why it was pushed in the first place.

reply to post by neo96

Anyone who didn't think immigration/Amnesty wasn't about votes was not living in reality.

Which is hilarious as those "voters" you speak of, are really conservative (traditional family values, predominately Catholic), but a political ideology has abandoned them as sub human so those "voters" go with the other side who accepts them.

The right rejects a huge voting bloc based solely on ethnic stereotypes (brown skin = illegal alien) and so the vast majority of that voting block goes to the Dems.

Please learn the definition of Socialism and then learn the definition of Statism and apply properly.

*facepalm*

Again with the definition issues?

Call Obama a commie, socialist, statist, oligarchist, doffus. . . .

The one thing he ISN'T is a representative of the American people, a representative of the American Constitution, a representative of American ideals.

From now on, I dub Obama; a Remulax from the planet Greebo with a taste for Kartoffel Greeb and WD40.

Names, definitions. . . blahblahblah

He's not good for the future of this country. His ideas are bad. His policies are bad. His associates are bad.

reply to post by elouina


I think at this stage in the game Obama is just like "what are they gonna do? fire me?"
he is done trying to portray himself as a middle of the road nice guy.