It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The test used to determine whether an arrest took place in a particular case is objective, and it turns on whether a reasonable person under these circumstances would believe he or she was restrained or free to go. A reasonable person is one who is not guilty of criminal conduct, overly apprehensive, or insensitive to the seriousness of the circumstances.
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to post by MrJohnSmith
If any driver is stupid enough to drive without seatbelts on, they deserve all they get, In the event of an accident.
I know a couple of people that in the past were in an accident and swear that had they had a seat belt on, they would have been killed.
One fellow said that he had to stand nearly up on his brakes when he was in an accident and it messed his leg up when he crashed. [an idiot driver pulled out in front of him]
Had he stayed sitting with a seat belt on, his ribs would have been crushed.
To this day, they will NOT wear a seat belt.
It should be a personal choice, not mandatory.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by snarky412
Some times when leaving an event, they'll have a road block for checking for drunks.
So for me, that's not unusual to have check points.
I know a driver license comes with some stipulations because it is a PRIVILEGE not a RIGHT but…..
It should piss us all off that some states subject their people to this crap without due cause/due process/whatever. This is a clear encroachment on the fourth amendment, no??
Originally posted by Domo1
Good. I have a huge problem with checkpoints. I don't mind that talking on the phone is illegal, don't really mind seat belt laws (some mild reservations) but I DO mind people being stopped by police for 'checkups'. Check points are pitched as a way of increasing awareness and saving lives, but I think there is an unspoken agreement that they are also revenue generators. Everyone bitches about the cops that work these things, but really you should be bitching about the people who allow them and require them. The cops performing this task are no more guilty than those who stop and submit to it.
Can we not call these guys heroes please? I like what they did, but they aren't 'brave patriots' with 'brass balls'. They stood on the side of the road and warned people. Again, awesome job, but lets not elevate it to absurd levels. Not to mention they were pretty annoyingly proud of themselves. Yeah, good on you, but tone it down a notch.
I'm sort of amazed how many states allow this nonsense. I've only seen one checkpoint, and I think it was in Canada. Like another poster (Seabag I think) pointed out driving is a privilege and not a right, but I don't think that means all your other rights go out the window when you hop in the car.
Originally posted by MrJohnSmith
reply to post by gladtobehere
I'm certainly amazed ! These two persons were interfering with a legitimate police operation, it appears to me.
If any driver is stupid enough to drive without seatbelts on, they deserve all they get, In the event of an accident.
Sorry, I'm not going along with this silly anti police nonsense.
I am amazed they weren't arrested.....I don 't think they drove the police off, either, their operation came to an end...
Looks to me like they did the police officers job for them, reminding drivers to put their belts on...
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by HomerinNC
Good point.
And there were like 6 or 7 cop cars? Is there no more crime in America? Or is terrorizing citizens a full time job?
Is it me or are there WAY too many cops?
edit on 5-8-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrJohnSmith
reply to post by gladtobehere
I'm certainly amazed ! These two persons were interfering with a legitimate police operation, it appears to me.
If any driver is stupid enough to drive without seatbelts on, they deserve all they get, In the event of an accident.
Sorry, I'm not going along with this silly anti police nonsense.
I am amazed they weren't arrested.....I don 't think they drove the police off, either, their operation came to an end...
Looks to me like they did the police officers job for them, reminding drivers to put their belts on...
Originally posted by MrJohnSmith
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
Respectfully, If the citizens weren't so belligerent and contrary, and stayed within the law, the forces of law and order would find it difficult to hand out fines... This would be a far more sensible way of protesting against what is seen as a money making operation by the police ?