It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by doobydoll
My goodness, where did you get all that from?
Never once have I said that I think a burger flipper or mail-man should be making the same money as you, not once. Not once have I said I want a society where no-one excels, nor have I said that everyone should get the same.
I have only said that I think minimum wage should be increased to where unskilled workers can get off benefits and pay their own way. But you seem to think it's ok for working people to be paid so little that the taxpayer has to top up their pay. And it should be Walmart paying this money, not the taxpayer.
Originally posted by doobydoll
In an hour of their work, they work just as hard as you do in an hour of your work. Work is still work - theirs is just different to yours.
Originally posted by doobydoll
They probably would work 10 hour days if they had the opportunity, but minimum wage earners are usually on zero-hour contracts and are lucky to get 10 hours a week at times.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I have never said I want the same income as you because it isn't true, I don't want to make the same as you, sincerely.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I have never been very academic - don't get me wrong, I was bright at school but I was just not very good at exams, I don't know why (I always say qualifications don't show you're brainy, they just show you're good at exams). Also I never had an opportunity to stay on at school, my dad died when I was 9 and I was the eldest of 3, when I was 16 my mother needed me to go to work.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I certainly don't want to rip people like you down, It's just that I can't understand why you people would not want low-paid people off benefits and paying for their own living. I can't understand why people whom are successful would want to keep allowing their hard-earned taxes to top up Walmart's below-poverty wages.
Originally posted by doobydoll
You're the one who wants to keep a section of society down and wallowing in crap by defending poverty wages, thereby forcing working people to be dependent on the taxpayers to live, only to be vilified by you and your type afterwards for briefly peeping out of their life of crap, and daring to ask for help.
Originally posted by doobydoll
You haven't outright said it but you don't have to, your negative words reveal much. You can't disguise it and it's obvious.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I don't worry what you have, not at all. I am sincere when I say I am happy that you want for nothing and are successful, and I'm glad you are happy with your materially-successful life. Personally, I don't crave money or luxuries, it isn't the be all and end all, not in my life.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I can't go out and buy a 'clever' gene to pass exams with, and that's what I need to have a chance at being successful - in this life anyway. But it's pointless worrying about not being very clever, so I don't
Originally posted by Garkiniss
You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
A Metal Working Mill ≠ A distribution warehouse
Originally posted by Garkiniss
It's easy to follow the rules when you create them. Ask any 4 year old on the playground.
I'm holding both responsible. Corporations shouldn't be buying votes, and politians shouldn't be accepting.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
True, but the word "faith" is synonymous with Abrahamism, and considering most Conservatives are Christians, I took a guess. Though we both know I wasn't wrong.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Working ≠ Stealing. Working = Earning. Anyone working a full week at a job, no matter what rung they stand on, shouldn't make less than a living wage. Period.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
If a worker spends 30-40hrs per week working at my house and they walk away with enough to pay his bills I wouldn't consider it stealing. I'd consider it pay for a hard day's work.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
You're either trolling or just plain hypocritical. If you think it's fair that someone working 30-40hrs per week doesn't earn enough to live on, then you CAN NOT be mad that they ask for assistance. Corporations like Walmart create that increase in taxes.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Not if the jobs don't exist. Not if they're shipped over seas chasing Bush's outsource tax breaks.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
People can learn more. They can apply for student loans, take an apprenticeship, learn a trade. That's if Walmart and other Corps haven't run them out of town.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
That's if outsourcing hasn't pushed them overseas.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
It still takes years to learn these trades, and there still aren't enough positions in those fields to cover 30% of the country's population. Meanwhile, people need help.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
You're talking about putting a bandaid on a tumor.
You're right. That is enough for a fresh out of high school worker. Now try living on 20K when you've got a family to feed, a house to pay for, commuting costs, utilities, insurance, and child care. Child Care can run upwards of $10,000.00-$15,000.00 annually. There goes half of that 50-75% of that 20K.
In most communities, child care equals the cost of rent.
The exact reason that Roman coinage sustained constant debasement is not known, but the most common theories involve inflation, trade with India, which drained silver from the Mediterranean world, and inadequacies in state finances. It is clear from papyri that the pay of the Roman soldier increased from 900 sestertii a year under Augustus to 2000 sestertii a year under Septimius Severus and the price of grain more than tripled indicating that fall in real wages and a moderate inflation occurred during this time.[10]
Without a constant influx of precious metals from an outside source, and with the expense of continual wars, it would seem reasonable that coins might be debased to increase the amount that the government could spend. A simpler possible explanation for the debasement of coinage is that it allowed the state to spend more than it had. By decreasing the amount of silver in its coins, Rome could produce more coins and "stretch" its budget. As time progressed, the trade deficit of the west, because of its buying of grain and other commodities, led to a currency drainage in Rome.
Originally posted by doobydoll
macman
You're choosing to ignore my answers in my posts to you and I don't want to continuously repeat myself, so it is pointless debating with you. You have a blinkered and single-minded view of life and people, because you choose to be that way.
That's what greed and avarice does to you.edit on 2-8-2013 by doobydoll because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
weeeell a democratic government is supposed to be run by the people so if in controlling wages the government is enacting the will of the majority of the populace it can be argued that this is simply the labour force leveraging for higher wages
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doobydoll
macman
You're choosing to ignore my answers in my posts to you and I don't want to continuously repeat myself, so it is pointless debating with you. You have a blinkered and single-minded view of life and people, because you choose to be that way.
That's what greed and avarice does to you.edit on 2-8-2013 by doobydoll because: (no reason given)
What greed?
Oh, I get it. You calling me greedy is your definition of me wanting to keep what I earned.
Okay then, ya got me. I am greedy. Oh shucks. I shall go cry in the corner.
Or, maybe now I am motivated to hire a CPA that will drop my taxes from around 35% to 15% and keep more of what I earned,
Thanks, I have been looking for a solid reason to do that. I can thank you for it.
If you want to debate this any further, let me know. Or, just slink back under the Progressive rock and avoid being challenged on your BS.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
Total = 1,020 a month cost of living
I work for minimum wage 50 hours or so a week... my take home after taxes probably averages 635 every two weeks.....
total income = 1270 a month