It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by christafinias
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by AthiestJesus
so food and shelter for disabled people is an unnecessary entitlement ?
What about nappies and care ... those too ?
You want us to let disabled people just die whilst drowning them out with the MSM "thinkbox" ?
WHAT?
Don’t make fallacious arguments. The issue is that people with an extra room are being forced to downsize or lose £15 of the FREE MONEY they receive. That is hardly starving people or letting people die!
most of them have already contributed before claiming ...... but you see them all as leeches on taxes - yet have no problem with dave and his pals taking every penny for themselves ? ...
Do you know most of them?? have you got some evidence to back that up? thats a rather bold statement MOST have contributed......Do you know most people??
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by christafinias
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by AthiestJesus
so food and shelter for disabled people is an unnecessary entitlement ?
What about nappies and care ... those too ?
You want us to let disabled people just die whilst drowning them out with the MSM "thinkbox" ?
WHAT?
Don’t make fallacious arguments. The issue is that people with an extra room are being forced to downsize or lose £15 of the FREE MONEY they receive. That is hardly starving people or letting people die!
most of them have already contributed before claiming ...... but you see them all as leeches on taxes - yet have no problem with dave and his pals taking every penny for themselves ? ...
Do you know most of them?? have you got some evidence to back that up? thats a rather bold statement MOST have contributed......Do you know most people??
Every penny of benefit is Taxed, everything you buy is Taxed, so how do they not contribute to society...An average smoker/Drinker will pay more tax over a lifetime than a Non smoker/drinker, so does that make the smoker/drinker a more valuable member of society. ?
For every £5000 The UK tax payer pays, roughly around £47 or £74, cant remember" goes to the benefits system...now compare that with £900 for every £5000 tax payed going to Private sector pensions...who's draining the public purse more
Wake up.
Originally posted by christafinias
because someone's buying stuff out of there benefits (free money) does not mean they are contributing.
that benefit is a chunk of my wages they took for tax.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Originally posted by christafinias
because someone's buying stuff out of there benefits (free money) does not mean they are contributing.
that benefit is a chunk of my wages they took for tax.
If that "free money" wasn't sloshing around communities, and there isn't dignified employment for them all, how do you expect these people to survive? Would you rather give them say, a £100 a week not to be a nuisance, or spend a £1000 per week to lock them up everytime they get caught stealing from those who have jobs?
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Why would someone who may have stayed in the same home for 30+ years, maybe scattered their husbands/wifes ashes in the Garden, spent thousand of £££ maintaining someone else's property, made lifelong friends with their neighbours and have close family and support systems close at hand be turfed from that home...
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by Firefly_
Its disgusting isn't it
But this is what you get with a tory government, more for them, less for everyone else.
They better appeal.
Dirty tory Scumbags
I don’t disagree that many within your government (and my own) may very well be sumbags but how does responsibly managing excess spending make them scumbags? Would you rather they spend even more on unnecessary entitlements?
Originally posted by paraphi
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Why would someone who may have stayed in the same home for 30+ years, maybe scattered their husbands/wifes ashes in the Garden, spent thousand of £££ maintaining someone else's property, made lifelong friends with their neighbours and have close family and support systems close at hand be turfed from that home...
Because "that home" does not belong to them and their staying it is off the back of tax payers. Your statement the supports the "money for nothing" society - that is what people find so annoying. If a person is living in a house paid for by tax payers then they should live in one that is not over-sized, regardless of whether they scattered ashes in the garden.
I am all for helping people live, but I resent people expecting me to continually subsidise their lifestyle when they are not prepared to make compromises.
Regards
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
reply to post by fossildog
So your source is a conservative paper ?
This whole country is drowning in bias propaganda.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
I seriously dont understand anyone who can agree with this bedroom tax..oh wait, i can...Jealousy, Plain and simple. What state must your petty, narrow minded life be in to be Jealous of the Plate licker's of society... Just like 30 Germany, they have fallen for the Government spin. it's no more than what i expect from the weak of mind and those who cant think for themselves though...
Direct your anger elsewhere...not at the Poorest and weakest members of society...Cowards!!
BTW, when you get up in the morning, i'll be looking out from my semi closed Blinds and pointing the finger at you and laughing as you jump on the treadmill once more just so i can live a life of Luxury with my big flat screen TV and Sky Broadband on the back of your sweat and tears..
Then i will jump back under the covers to sleep off my Drug and Alcohol induced Hangover. ~George Osbourne,edit on 31-7-2013 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)edit on 31-7-2013 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fossildog
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
reply to post by fossildog
So your source is a conservative paper ?
This whole country is drowning in bias propaganda.
Seriously? The Guardian is as left wing and socialist as they come. Are you from the UK, you really do not seem to know what you are talking about? You claim there are 'millions homeless and starving' in the UK which is frankly utter rubbish. Unless you can provide proof? Granted there is some poverty in the UK but this is generally self inflicted by people who have drug or alcohol issues.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
reply to post by christafinias
So you have a job, a Car, a house, you go on Holidays, you have Sky tv, but you're still Pissed off...Strange fellow...
is a decent standard of living for you and your family not good enough.. do you lose sleep at night thinking about who might be getting £71 a week to live on that could be fit for work....Greed will destroy us all.
Try being Unemployed for a few Months, maybe then you will develop some compassion and Understanding.
Originally posted by Firefly_
reply to post by paraphi
Why should there be a blanket application of this backwards policy to everyone, regardless of situationedit on 31-7-2013 by Firefly_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Firefly_
Not to make light of the situation but….this social cradle to grave assistance provided by government (the tax payer) is and always will be unsustainable. How in the world is cutting back on excess benefits be considered discrimination or a human right violation???
Beggars can’t be choosers, friend. The 'takers' of society don't get to make the rules....the 'givers' do! If I make a charitable donation, the recipient doesn’t get to determine the amount and then accuse me of violating their rights for not giving MORE.
What am I missing here?