It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by meemaw
reply to post by openyourmind1262
May be you're right. May be they should have tasered him, taken him in, given him a 72 hour psychiatric hold, sent him to a psych and rehab facility then released him back to his father after a few weeks . THEN, when he goes nuts again, and next time, takes out an innocent, you can all sit here and b@#$% about how the justice system failed and released a violent psyciatric drug addict into back into society...
Originally posted by Stealthwatch
I just have to say this. It will cost me my log in but thats fine i will just make a new one.
Cops will keep pushing the limits till the consequences of their actions are too great. The force is full of mentally ill, murderous sons of bi@@@$ who is there for no other reason than exactly this. Bunch of jerks who find a legal way to kill and maim. So why not try the following. Those cops must be local thus people must know where they live. A bit of street justice goes a long way. You will not be able to take revenge on them but they must have a wive and kids or at least a pet. A eye for an eye. Go shoot his wife or kid or dog. Make sure to leave a note to say exactly why it happen.
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
18 year olds in Canada are just stupid kids...they are not criminals. This 18 yr old should have been tasered enough to let go of the knife and then immediately handcuffed and tossed into jail.
This is police brutality...and is plain disgusting for me to watch as a true Canadian citizen. *RIP* I feel sorry for his family...
Originally posted by jacobe001
You know, every post of yours DEF has been one of "Procedures and Policies" including documents to back it up, but nothing about common sense, moral, nor ethical considerations in regards to the actions many of these LEO's take.
Originally posted by meemaw
No, not thought police or pre-crime. He was committing the crime when he was shot.
Originally posted by meemaw
The enhanced videos unfortunately show very little detail about what was going on in the streetcar. I refuse to join the herd and condemn the officers before I have all the facts... I asked a police officer who was attending the ER today with an accident victim what his thoughts were on the shooting and he said that he too had watched the video and suggested the possibility that when the man stepped back away from the door, it appeared that he bent down briefely and took a few steps back further into the bus. The video doesn't show what happened when he stepped forward just before he was shot, but the officer I spoke to said the one thing that would entice him to shoot was if the guy on the bus had pointed a gun, or something that appeared to be a gun. I thought this made perfect sense, and it's too bad no one in the media has presented this possibility to the public...... This is all unfortunate, and there is a family mourning their son, brother, etc...there is obviously much more to this story and once the SIU finishes it's investigation, hopefully we will know more. If they don't release the details, but find that the office did indeed act appropriately, and he is returned to full duty, I'll be ok with that....
Originally posted by meemaw
THEN, when he goes nuts again, and next time, takes out an innocent, you can all sit here and b@#$% about how the justice system failed and released a violent psyciatric drug addict into back into society...
The police may use all the force that is necessary to overcome resistance, even if that means killing the person they are trying to arrest.
Originally posted by meemaw
reply to post by openyourmind1262
May be you're right. May be they should have tasered him, taken him in, given him a 72 hour psychiatric hold, sent him to a psych and rehab facility then released him back to his father after a few weeks . THEN, when he goes nuts again, and next time, takes out an innocent, you can all sit here and b@#$% about how the justice system failed and released a violent psyciatric drug addict into back into society...
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by Hefficide
Your answer is right here in your article:
The police may use all the force that is necessary to overcome resistance, even if that means killing the person they are trying to arrest.
I believe that I have said that since I started typing here today...
I believe I even posted the use of force matrix multiple times.
Police DON'T NEED to be "IN FEAR" to use LETHAL FORCE, that's a CIVILIAN SELF DEFENSE LAW...
Taking the bus was a felony.
Aggravated Assault with a deadly weapon on citizens is a felony.
Aggravated Assault with a deadly weapon on police is a felony.
Resisting arrest can be a felony.
So how many felonies and resistances do you want to allow this guy to stack up before the police are allowed to do something about it?
Yep... Let's allow him hang out for a few more hours and see what other damage he can do while we block him in with cars, wait around for negotiators, and basically twiddle our thumbs.
I'm done with this, everyone can go on about your police “hate” session, and in the end I'll bet you that legally these cops are all cleared.
Time will tell, and I'll be sure to bring this post back to the forefront when the verdict is reached.
Yep... Let's allow him hang out for a few more hours and see what other damage he can do while we block him in with cars, wait around for negotiators, and basically twiddle our thumbs.