It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Schillinger
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by Schillinger
I'm not going to argue, I just want to say that I'm deeply sorry for all the brainwashed women out there. Feminism is one of the reasons the western world's birth rate is so low to the point that we're not even replacing ourselves anymore. It's a shame, all they're doing is ruining the traditional family, but that's the point of eugenics I suppose.
Yeah it doesn't really matter about women who dont want to have kids in their late teen's/early 20's, all that really matters is demographics.
You're banging on about birthrates like a women has a duty to produce 2+ kids. With the way things financially stand, couples cant even afford the roof in which to raise a family under. That's not down to feminism, that's down to the man shipping well paid jobs abroad so he can make a few billion.
I agree with the point that the middle class has been completely thrown under the bus in the name of making a few people rich (one look at Detroit tells you that), and that is a large reason as to why people aren't having kids, but you can't deny that western civilization is literally dying off when we're not even replacing ourselves. And you can't deny that the feminist movement is, at it's very core, anti-family.
The problem that I have is that everything is so anti-male and anti-family that it's almost like an agenda. Turn on the tv and all you see is anti-male anti-family propaganda. And it's all pushed by this hatred for men spewed from the mouths of ignorant feminists that really just feel entitled to what they haven't earned.
Women deserve equality, not superiority. And that's really the point here. The message should be about how we empower women to become strong minded individuals within society, earn equal wages, programs in self defense, etc. Not how to bash and hate men, demand the loving womanly right to murder their unborn child, or sit on welfare and collect Government assistance.
Feminists in america must be awful, however im pro-choice so i dont agree with your statement about abortions and i dont want to see people sitting on welfare either.
You want real change and equality? It's going to take time. You don't change the mindset of thousands of years in 50. We need positive female role models to teach the next generation, not women that hang on the every word of these feminists with an obvious agenda. This isn't a sports game, you're not siding with your "team" just because you're female.
To be fair im not really expecting any more change to occur - I feel equal to everyone except those people running the show!
Originally posted by Schillinger
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
You don't get it, do you? It's not about women. It's not about men. It's about humanity as a species. You are not on a team just because you're a woman. And you don't need to agree with everything said or done by these movements just because you're the same sex. This is not a sports team... see past the agenda here and speak on what you see to be right.
Read my previous post. Why do we have federal programs based on condoms but not on teaching women to defend themselves? Why is abortion at the top of the list when equal pay is much more important? This is an agenda, the same as it was in the 50s to get women smoking.
Look past the gender lines and fight for true equality, not this left wing crap being shoved down everyone's throat.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
I don't consider the existence of feminists is new. In the 20th century the term feminist was born and it was the more fitting term for an age of modern technology, and advanced ideas to recognise the existence that feminine energies had a dark as well as light side. In the earlier and middle centuries the suitable term to identify the dark energy was as witches. The methods used to weed them out and curtail their black arts was thoroughly robust and guaranteed a stop to their goal of bringing an end to the civilised world.
Originally posted by eletheia
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
I don't consider the existence of feminists is new. In the 20th century the term feminist was born and it was the more fitting term for an age of modern technology, and advanced ideas to recognise the existence that feminine energies had a dark as well as light side. In the earlier and middle centuries the suitable term to identify the dark energy was as witches. The methods used to weed them out and curtail their black arts was thoroughly robust and guaranteed a stop to their goal of bringing an end to the civilised world.
Although women have been around since time began and for the same length of time
as men, It appears it has taken men till the 20th century to 'discover' that.
Then they decided to call them 'feminists' instead of 'women'
Originally posted by Schillinger
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
You don't get it, do you? It's not about women. It's not about men. It's about humanity as a species. You are not on a team just because you're a woman. And you don't need to agree with everything said or done by these movements just because you're the same sex. This is not a sports team... see past the agenda here and speak on what you see to be right.
Read my previous post. Why do we have federal programs based on condoms but not on teaching women to defend themselves? Why is abortion at the top of the list when equal pay is much more important? This is an agenda, the same as it was in the 50s to get women smoking.
Look past the gender lines and fight for true equality, not this left wing crap being shoved down everyone's throat.
Originally posted by eletheia
Originally posted by Schillinger
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
You don't get it, do you? It's not about women. It's not about men. It's about humanity as a species. You are not on a team just because you're a woman. And you don't need to agree with everything said or done by these movements just because you're the same sex. This is not a sports team... see past the agenda here and speak on what you see to be right.
Read my previous post. Why do we have federal programs based on condoms but not on teaching women to defend themselves? Why is abortion at the top of the list when equal pay is much more important? This is an agenda, the same as it was in the 50s to get women smoking.
Look past the gender lines and fight for true equality, not this left wing crap being shoved down everyone's throat.
In your first paragraph just substitute the word 'woman' for 'man' and vice versa
and you will have it right
I don't know when or why abortion was brought into this thread I have vaguely referred
to it in answer to a poster, but I have also posted that I will not be drawn into that argument
in this thread (its off topic and not relative )and there are enough threads already dealing
with the subject.
Why instead of teaching women to 'defend' themselves do they not teach men anger
management, respect, and that women have opinions too? and their opinions are valid
even if they are not the same as theirs. Women have their own minds and views and are
not the property of men, to mould into what they want and as they see fit.
Its a very sad world indeed that needs to teach women to defend themselves!
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by rickymouse
Those new kind of feminists are kind of bitchy and pushy. I hope I never have to meet up with them when they are on the prowl. I think they are like female lions or tigers. I better mind my mouth, they may find where I live and do a topless protest here. I'll have to get the cats and deer to watch, wouldn't want them feeling they aren't getting enough attention.
And what of men who are arrogant and domineering - where's the difference?
Women have consistently proven historically to perform admirably often better under pressure than their male counterparts. In WWII, The Soviets found women to be quite superb snipers.
Originally posted by luciddream
OH PLEASE! *i thought this thread would be dead by now*
Then why are not women a majority in the "art of military"?? they are supposedly the ultimate soldiers according to you.
The soviet snipers? you know what percent of that snipers were women and what percent of the whole military was snipers... we are looking below 3%... yeah forget the 90%+ men that died, so their mothers, sisters and daughter have a chance to live and pass on their own genes.
You bring out few examples of women with outstanding achievements, nothing compared to men in that ratio and in that time.edit on 8/2/2013 by luciddream because: (no reason given)edit on 8/2/2013 by luciddream because: (no reason given)
source
The Soviet Union also used women for sniping duties extensively, including Lyudmila Pavlichenko and Nina Lobkovskaya.
source
Over 800,000 women served in the Soviet armed forces in World War II; nearly 200,000 of them were decorated and 89 of them eventually received the Soviet Union’s highest award, the Hero of the Soviet Union. They served as pilots, snipers, machine gunners, tank crew members and partisans, as well as in auxiliary roles.
Is this why most men think 4 inches is 6?
Is this why most men think 4 inches is 6?
Originally posted by eletheia
reply to post by mahatche
Just to take your first paragraph in this post directed at me
# " Nope, I feel no intimidation or insecurity. That's your expectation"
Nope I believe expect nothing and then you won't be disappointed!
# "I think I made it pretty clear that I'm talking about real people I've encountered"
Does that mean that the people I encounter aren't real??
# "I wish you could witness a self righteous 'feminazi' as she unleash a flurry of
unrealistic expectations on a poor unsuspecting soul".
Hmmnn ... notice the slight shift from feminist to feminazi be careful your
misogyny is slipping out And boo hoo we've now also got the victim
card played "As she unleash a flurry of unrealistic expectations on
'a poor unsuspecting soul'"