It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by BO XIAN
Where is the evidence that aliens are the ones who did any of those things you listed?
Books do not count as evidence because they are second hand by nature.
First hand evidence would be a video showing an alien doing those things or some type of physical evidence that actually "proves" aliens did it.
As I thought, you assume any kind of alien contact has to do with satanism. If not, what kind of alien contact wouldn't be fallen angels or Satan?
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
If ETs are fallen angels, then that automatically means that angels in Jesus's army are ALSO Extraterrestrial. They just chose good and not evil.
HaHa... You can't deny that if you say ETs are fallen angels.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Phage
But then again, maybe not.
If they came all the way to Earth and attempted to make contact with us, I think that shows some level of interest in us, don't you think?
Originally posted by Druscilla
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Druscilla
...
No one with an EXPERIENCE need feel one down from someone with merely an opinion or argument.
I've had my own battles with such entities.
Your opinions don't hold a candle to my own experiences.
Not even to my own research.
I'm still waiting enlightenment on the validity of "experiencers" claiming to do "reasearch".
It's a little like a Schizophrenic diagnosing themselves, of which we've plenty precedent, and example, even with at least one admittedly openly confessed and diagnosed subject here on ATS that has dozens and dozens of threads about chips being put in their head, messages from interdimensional time travelers, anecdotes about talking to and controlling AI UFOs with their mind, and on and on and on.
Any "experiencer" should excuse themselves from any attempts to do any research on the subject as they ARE a subject, and should submit themselves as a data point as an "experiencer" for clinical interview, examination, and long term close monitored observation.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
I was being sarcastic
Still it doesn't say that we should not love our neighbour like you said
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by boymonkey74
ASSUMPTIONS ARE NOT NECESSARY.
Google human mutilation.
Search until you find the gruesome pictures of the HUMAN mutilation(s).
Ask yourself if they'd done that to your closest loved one how benevolent you'd consider them.
Assume you have a 16 year old daughter come to you about being raped in the middle of the night by ET type critters.
You take her to the gynecologist the very first thing. He affirms that she's been raped and that the cells collected to not match any human DNA.
At the end of her resulting first trimester of pregnancy, she has just gone again to the gynecologist . .. he affirms that the baby is fine. That night, without hypnosis she remembers another abduction wherein her baby was taken from her womb. The next morning first thing you take her again to her gynecologist and he affirms that the baby is totally gone.
Would you STILL label them wonderful chaps to have over for coffee and a cigar?
Regardless, in my face to face extensive conversations with him, I assessed him.
Or something to that effect.
EVERY ONE OF THOSE TRIBES were saturated, polluted with fallen angel DNA and child sacrificing-to-satan practices.